This story gets stranger by the day...infact it becomes more and more about RL.
Will be interesting to see what the fingerprint expert has to say. Not sure he can say much but I presume they will conduct some tests on a female climbing over the balcony......
Also as I have said I think they will try and question whether the eyewitness evidence is reliable based on the distance and the trees he would have to have seen through.
I expect probably a more balanced view to be presented which will lend impetus to any appeal.
BBM. We all know that the Gf does not want her 'best boyfriend ever' to be GUILTY.
IMO two main areas they would like to challenge are:
1) The eyewitness testimony;
2) The pinhole camera.
The eye witness saw what he saw. His credibility was established before the Court. No point chasing ambulances.
Caught by his own camera as they say!!!
It was Trial by the Supreme Court, not trial by media ratings for Channel 7.
IMO it is outrageous that Gf has been permitted to publicly question the judgement of the Court in her quest to add impetus to any Appeal.
The nature & extent of the relationship between GF, SG and Lisa may need further exploration to include opinions from others. Gf allegedly introduced Lisa to SG, Gf was in a vehicle at the same time etc. Was she invited to the conversion ceremony? Was she invited to the engagement party?
Questions may need to be explored a little further Channel 7 or you may have overlooked some vital information. IMO Gf seems more intertwined than is publicly outed.
The Gf publicly infers that Lisa was "impulsive"! What professional training does she have to use such a label? She besmirches Lisa's reputation in the eyes of the public. I hope there is a legal avenue for Lisa's family to gain redress & damages against the Gf.
IMO this is an attempt to gain high exposure and to influence approx. 1.79+ million viewers to see it the way Gf would like it to be seen. We know that SG is capable of apoplectic rage when he does not get what he wants, but is Gf similar or is she 'acting out' by extension that rage through the media? She has used the media as a tool to project the view that: "They've got it wrong!".
Gf might need to consider that 'others' may find legal ways to get some of that money she has been paid by Channel 7.
Acting-out by extension or Omnipotence?