I think JC's evidence will carry a lot of weight. it was odd to me that Dawson is relying on the testimony of a convicted criminal who claimed that 'Lynn was trying to set her husband up, leaving her stuff and disappearing, out of spite,'.. and yet then , in rebuttal of Joanne's testimony, claiming her testimony is setting him up, out of spite.It will be interesting to hear the judge's reasons. There's no shortage of evidence showing motive and opportunity. I believe there is evidence that "getting rid of Lyn" was a theme in the troubled home.
It's almost as if Dawson had a magnet that attracted spiteful women. The judge will weigh both those peculiar sentiments up, I would think. His presentation is overloaded with the evidence of a very very spiteful man, who 's capacity to undermine and misrepresent those to whom he owed much more than a passing objectivity.
I wouldn't be surprised to hear that Dawson has a lot of whining to do about the third Mrs Dawson.....