- Joined
- Feb 3, 2022
- Messages
- 209
- Reaction score
- 1,559
Maybe they got catering for lunch today… waiting… waiting 

I’m still not totally convinced that the “pension” wasn’t actually “proceeds from grift”.So far it appears that they could at least be charged with Social Security Fraud since 1980. When they went overseas, they remained on the Electoral Roll each year as someone pointed out yesterday. My prediction is that their pensions (if she was also on one as a Carer?) would have been automatically going into their bank account while they were away. Also since when did a person receive an invalid pension due to PSTD? Also they owned at least two or three properties other than where they were living which they probably did not disclose and they rented so they would also receive rent assistance. So do authorities force them to sell anything they own now in restitution so Diane is probably afraid she'll end up with no assets and in prison.
Social Security fraud is an important part of the CDPP’s practice. The Department of Human Services (DHS) refers briefs of evidence in relation to allegations that people have intentionally engaged in conduct that has seen them receive social security benefits they know they are not entitled to.
Cases typically involve someone receiving benefits that have been calculated on a false premise.
Main offences
Penalties
- s.134.1(1) Criminal Code—obtaining property by deception
- s.134.2(1) Criminal Code—obtaining a financial advantage by deception
- s.135.1(5) Criminal Code—general dishonesty—causing a loss
- s.135.2(1) Criminal Code—obtaining a financial advantage.
The maximum penalties are:
- 10 years’ imprisonment for offences of obtaining property and obtaining a financial advantage by deception
- 10 years’ imprisonment for an offence of general dishonesty
- 12 months’ imprisonment for an offence of obtaining a financial advantage.
she reminds me of the wife in "muriel's wedding" .. if anyone remembers that.
I’m still not totally convinced that the “pension” wasn’t actually “proceeds from grift”.
I’m still not totally convinced that the “pension” wasn’t actually “proceeds from grift”.
Bet you RB has skipped town and theyre searching for him![]()
Me too. Don't they know that I have very important things to do that I'm not doing?Is it back yet ?
I have it set to automatically resume.
Waiting, taps foot!
Or maybe he's had a medical "incident"Bet you RB has skipped town and theyre searching for him![]()
She has to come up with some “legitimate” explanation for where the money came from.That too. But she would not admit to the pension if it wasn't true. She knows police know about it.
Some older people just seem to be like that (my family are), but the thing that gets me is that she'll re-frame the question in her answer. For example, 'did you eat three weetbix for breakfast today?' 'oh I usually eat breakfast'. Kudos to the patience of the bench!!