Australia Australia - Marion Barter - Missing After Trip to UK - June 1997 #20

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #201
  • #202
That is Def David. If you look at his swim meet photo that is him to a T
They share the same genes so who knows? I wish they would clarify!!
 
  • #203
Prime example of what was discussed re the newspapers too

What a SS.
 
  • #204
That is Def David. If you look at his swim meet photo that is him to a T

ok - I have no idea now lol

Honestly if they were just clear so no one needs to guess
 
  • #205
  • #206
Could the significance be that D and M agreed to be interviewed for Spotlight? Just wondering who would’ve supplied their photo?
IMG_8442.jpeg
 
  • #207
T

Ah awesome! Problem solved.
Who would we remember you as?

I think we are all just a little bit high strung due to waiting for anything we have been working on to either be confirmed or denied so we know how to proceed with researching the myriad of leads.

Hopefully we can all proceed with mutual respect for the newbies catching up and the stalwarts who have repeated themselves a thousand times haha
I was previously @Whonose. Haha yes, there is an amazing amount of work and sleuthing effort by so many on here, I was more of a ‘sit back and read’ member as the clever ones usually beat me to it! And I thank and respect all the stalwarts for their repeated comments, its good to get reminders as there’s been so so many leads that run off in all directions…. Hopefully the outcome is near.
 
  • #208
I was previously @Whonose. Haha yes, there is an amazing amount of work and sleuthing effort by so many on here, I was more of a ‘sit back and read’ member as the clever ones usually beat me to it! And I thank and respect all the stalwarts for their repeated comments, its good to get reminders as there’s been so so many leads that run off in all directions…. Hopefully the outcome is near.
Nice one, glad you came back despite the annoyance of doing a new account!
 
  • #209
TLV have updated their post to clarify it is M and D DeH
 
  • #210
I wonder does that mean M & D dH are now speaking out? Surely channel 7 would have needed their permission to publish that photo of them as children?
 
  • #211
I wonder does that mean M & D dH are now speaking out? Surely channel 7 would have needed their permission to publish that photo of them as children?
Hopefully!!
Unless it was used in the newspaper or something in the public domain?
 
  • #212
Gonna need a bigger white board:cool:
 
  • #213
I’m hoping that his son and daughter are realising this story is only going to get bigger and bigger and pleading ignorance and threatening legal action won’t make it go away. There is a tsunami coming their way so better to get in first.

I just hope that if they are interviewed by the media they’re not paid for it!!
 
  • #214
Maybe family dynamics have changed.

It could be the reason Mr AKA is no longer at home.

Maybe someone/s spat the dummy
 
  • #215
I don't mind who gets paid for what, as long as it leads to finding out more about what happened to Marion.
 
  • #216
I thought the rule was you cannot sleuth family members. So should this even be commented on?
 
  • #217
I thought the rule was you cannot sleuth family members. So should this even be commented on?
I’m only commenting on the TLV post with the photo shown of them as children. I’ve never sleuthed either of his kids although they were shown on the baptism records when looking for their crooked Dad in Burwash.

The son did become involved in the case when he tried to scare away one of the elderly lady victims threatening legal action as publicised in the media. I think it’s fair to comment on that.
 
  • #218
I thought the rule was you cannot sleuth family members. So should this even be commented on?
You maybe correct as to these rules , in that case a lot of opinion and comment would or should have been deleted a long time ago ... i often wonder because i have been reprimanded on other threads over the years so I dont bother any more
 
  • #219
perhaps son & daughter's deafening silence is due to the financial gain they have received over the years. JMO
When they were kids they had no way of knowing they were using the money of multiple women he conned, but now if they remain silent that speaks volumes about them in my opinion. I hope they speak out as their silence makes them complicit.
 
  • #220
When they were kids they had no way of knowing they were using the money of multiple women he conned, but now if they remain silent that speaks volumes about them in my opinion. I hope they speak out as their silence makes them complicit.
I guess they may be worried about getting sued by some of the victims families. After all, it seems they have been given money by their dad into adulthood. Maybe they’re worried about having to pay it back.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
65
Guests online
1,296
Total visitors
1,361

Forum statistics

Threads
632,473
Messages
18,627,265
Members
243,164
Latest member
thtguuurl
Back
Top