There are many questions I have after analysing the statements made by AK at the press interview. IMO I don’t believe AK is being entirely truthful but I am not sure if that is because he has been trained in how to respond, has been told not to answer certain questions or is lying. Obviously this type of interview is unnatural (especially if one feels they are, or could be, under suspicion) so nerves would be kicking in. Unfortunately there were not a lot of base line questions in the interview to gauge AK’s comfortable behaviour. Here is my analysis (sorry for the length). Times noted are rough and are based on the 9news Sydney appeal on Facebook.
- ‘Melissa is a dedicated and incredible mother, a beautiful daughter, sister and loved wife’. The word ‘loved’ is past tense. Who wrote this statement?
- 2:12 when asked about Melissa’s state of mind AK said ‘this is out of character and went on with his standard communities of Australia statement. Question was not answered.
- 2:24 when asked did he have any idea what happened to her AK did not answer the question. He provided the communities of Australia statement and then said ‘a lot of you know who she is....a lot of you know who she um... um who she is as a person...um.’ and then goes on with the communities statement. The use of the word ‘she’ instead of Melissa is interesting and could show disconnection.
- 2:45 when giving his appeal to Melissa he leans down into the microphone and says ‘you know how much we love you...um just come home everything’s taken care of - you’re not in trouble’. IMO his head down eyes largely closed and shaking head sideways are interesting. He smiled a little leaning into the microphone perhaps liking the option to appeal/reach out to Melissa. I am not not sure what is meant by ‘everything has been taken care of’. I would like to expand on this. I also note the word ‘we’ rather than ‘I’.
- 3:02 when asked is there anyone who may have wanted to hurt Melissa he says ‘no - not that I know of’. Eyes were often closed, head down, shakes head. Not a definite ‘no’ answer.
- 3:06 last conversation you had with her? AK does not answer the question. He closes his eyes, shakes head and mentions ‘the night before...um before we went to bed’. The use of ‘we’ is interesting and indicates both went to bed.
- 3:14 Was it just normal when you talked to her? ‘As normal’ - eyes closed and shakes head. IMO how can it be normal after that ASIC raid? As normal as what?
- 3:18 Did you speak to her before you went out for a run? ‘No I didn’t as I was asleep’ eyes largely closed.
- 3:24 did she go for a run every morning? ‘Consistently’. Not a yes answer. So sometimes she didn’t go for a run?
- 3:27 She didn’t take her phone with her? ‘She always took her phone...um....in this case this was the only time since I’ve known her that she did not have her phone with her’. Use of the word ‘she’ rather than ‘Melissa’. Not comfortable answering.
- 3:38 when did you realise something was wrong? ‘I was advised um to contact within 24 hours and that I did’. He did not answer the question. Who advised? When? When did ‘you’ realise?
- 3:50 were there some places she liked to go where people should be keeping an eye out for her? 3:53 he looked left then answered. He was more comfortable in answering this question. He was looking around comfortably and eyes were up. Could this be a base line response?
- 4:05 can you take us though the night before when you were with her? Did you have a party in the home then went to bed... ‘there’s nothing else that I can give you further’ - question not answered eyes largely closed. Note: 4:11 AG shakes head.
- 4:15 what sort of impact has this had on you and your family? Question not answered. ‘We just want her back....that’s all’. 4:24 looks down to left. Note the use of the word ‘her’ rather than Melissa.
- 4:28 impact on son? ‘He’s ...he’s good um as can be expected um that’s all I have to say at the moment thank you’. He uses the word ‘he’ here so it could be the way he regularly talks?
- 4:39 a lot of discussions in the media about prior financial investigations. Is that quite stressful for you family? ‘It’s ....it’s all just matter at this point....’ (matter?) then goes onto the communities statement. Question not answered.
- 4:58 when asked if the camera surely would have captured her leaving. AK reverted to how wonderful Bondi detectives are and did not answer the question. Note:AG shakes head slightly at 5:02.
The media asked some great questions however AK did not answer many of them for whatever reason. I would be seeking those answers by asking those questions in other ways. I assume the police would have already done this.
My sincere thoughts are with those affected by this matter.
Great analysis of the interview.
I also agree his base line looks like 3.50 (12).
Half or at least 7 questions of the questions were not answered.
Closed eyes or as Joe Navarro calls it eye blocking see
The Body Language of the Eyes
Head down could be either he is reading from a script, or something called 'turtling", the best and easiest example would be found at
Body Language Trainer - › The Turtle › sonamics
Just a couple of points;
A lack of emphasis. When we speak, we naturally give emphasis both verbally and non-verbally to what we say. Hand gestures, inflections, and head movements accentuate our words. However, most of this happens unconsciously. When our limbic brain backs up what we’re saying, we’ll unconsciously use body language to emphasize it. When our unconscious brain
doesn’t back up what we’re saying, those emphasizing gestures will not be present. An innocent person accused of murder will probably pound their fist and yell, “I didn’t do it!” You probably won’t see that with a person who actually committed the crime (despite the show you see the guilty put on on
Law & Order).
Eye direction. When people concentrate on something visual, they tend to look upwards. If they look
up and to their right, it means they’re concentrating on something visual that
they’re remembering from their past. If they look
up and to their left, it means they’re focusing on something
they’ve created in their minds. So if the person you’re talking with looks up and to the left as they recollect what happened, they may be making up the story right there on the spot. Although you’d think they’d turn and look down and behind, since that’s where they’re pulling things out of.
*** Eye directions are based on the
subject’s right and left. So when you’re watching them, when they look right it will look like they’re looking to your left, and when they look left, it will appear from your perspective that they’re looking right.
hen deciphering truth from lie, watching for synchrony is key. Synchrony is the proper alignment of what is said verbally and nonverbally, between events and emotions, and between the circumstances of the moment and what is being said. For example, you normally expect a parent whose child is missing to be hysterical, begging for the police to get out there and find their baby. If a parent seems detached and aloof, something’s probably up.
Call it nerves, but I call it deceptive behavouir, along with using the wrong tense. The limbic system never lies. He was not convincing. I know what I would do if I was interviewing him. Thanks for the really detailed post.
Synchrony should also be present in the way a person moves their head. If a person’s head begins to shake either in the affirmative or in the negative as he speaks, and the movement occurs simultaneously with what he says, then you can typically rely on the veracity of the statement. However, if he does the head shake
after he makes the statement, the statement is most likely false. You might even notice a person verbally saying “yes,” but shaking their head “no.” If what they say from their mouth doesn’t match with what their body says, you have a liar on your hands.
Little movement. Ever notice how animals will freeze when a predator is near? This instinctual behavior actually serves a survival benefit; it’s hard for predators to see something if it’s not moving. Well, humans do the same thing during moments of distress. When people lie, they tend to keep their body very still. The imminent danger in this case is getting caught lying. So our lizard brain will tell our body not to move, because maybe, just maybe, if we stay still, the other person won’t see that we’re lying. Got a friend who’s pulling a possum? Dude might be lying.