sundaymorning123
New Member
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2013
- Messages
- 42
- Reaction score
- 0
the book is symbolic to where his brain is at well at least he likes reading he wont get bored in jail
sorry... Maybe I should know this... But...Police believe Kelsall followed Mr Huxley home, after meeting at a local pub in Neutral Bay, in the hope of having 01sex.
Mr Huxley, a renowned "ladies man", was seen on CCTV footage walking barefoot from The Oaks Hotel down a busy street towards his home about 1.30am, with Kelsall seen following in the same direction seconds later.
The accused man's distraught mother, Lynne Kelsall, learned from police that her son and Mr Huxley, a marine construction company owner, had been involved in sexual activity in the lead up to the alleged murder.
http://news.ninemsn.com.au/national/2013/10/10/05/17/accused-s-parents-grieve-for-morgan-huxley
sorry... Maybe I should know this... But...
Is "01sex" a typo?...
Or is it a known term? (That I don't know)
TIA..:seeya:
finger typing on iphone makes things a little awkward im not really fussed about my grammer or punctuation at this time of the evening
Clue- I think it's a typo... Unless we are both missing something..
Does anyone else think the fact they slipped in that Morgan frequented that shop with a girl as a little clue to something? I have a feeling there's a third party.. A girl who has sent DJK to 'sus' MH out, waited for something to happen/kept a look out.. Would explain how his housemate only 'just' missed him.. I really don't think the housemate was involved in the least. Was MH involved with any of the Kelsall family?
Otherwise why would they mention the girl? It's like they're saying "we know you have been around him, we're onto you'.
I don't know, I'm trying to think irrationally to get into the killers head, and it's just sounding crazy, but we are not dealing with a sane person here.
Also if he was acting out a fantasy, perhaps he is so delusional he doesn't comprehend the trouble he's in, hence the book.. The book has to have something to do with it..
My boyfriend really wants me to stop being so involved in these things because I get so upset (Jill Meagher still haunts me), but I can't help it! Anyone else have a partner who doesn't get the obsession?!
Hi everyone! :seeya: I've been a lurker from the beginning - you've all had such fantastic insights that I felt I didn't have anything to add. But now I'm jumping in!
Firstly, Jmbr I too have a partner who doesn't get the obsession. That's why this forum is so fantastic for us!! He's a little creeped out by my interest in all things forensic.
And I agree that the police seem to be dropping subtle clues re the possible involvement of a woman. Early on after the arrest, one of the newspaper reports quoted the police as saying they are looking into the possible involvement of a female (but I think that's now been amended and removed - hard to keep track as they just update the same web article). Does anyone remember that? I suspect they know something more than what they're saying (as has obviously been the case all along!).
Hi everyone! :seeya: I've been a lurker from the beginning - you've all had such fantastic insights that I felt I didn't have anything to add. But now I'm jumping in!
Firstly, Jmbr I too have a partner who doesn't get the obsession. That's why this forum is so fantastic for us!! He's a little creeped out by my interest in all things forensic.
And I agree that the police seem to be dropping subtle clues re the possible involvement of a woman. Early on after the arrest, one of the newspaper reports quoted the police as saying they are looking into the possible involvement of a female (but I think that's now been amended and removed - hard to keep track as they just update the same web article). Does anyone remember that? I suspect they know something more than what they're saying (as has obviously been the case all along!).
Firstly, this is not judgement on anyone's comments at all - as the same thoughts sprang into my mind as soon as I saw who was arrested.
So, I'm a Clinical Psychologist who specialised in working with adolescents (until I had children and went into private practice) - and I've just got to say that all of the judgements about DJK being 'nerdy', 'weedy', 'geeky' are very telling. It's what would have happened for him his whole life, I suspect. And it definitely would have worn him down. (combined with other stuff, I'm sure - this doesn't erupt out of nowhere!)
Even the way he has been compared unfavourably to MH, would have been familiar to him. He is just so far from the 'popular' guy that MH seems to represent. It's these kids, as we saw in Columbine, who just build and build rage inside and then explode.
Just my thoughts :twocents:
This kid reminds me of Martin Bryant.
That "quiet boy" went on to massacre 31 people in just minutes.
Their fantasy life is so rich that ordinary folks just can't foresee their crimes.
Hi everyone! :seeya: I've been a lurker from the beginning - you've all had such fantastic insights that I felt I didn't have anything to add. But now I'm jumping in!
Firstly, Jmbr I too have a partner who doesn't get the obsession. That's why this forum is so fantastic for us!! He's a little creeped out by my interest in all things forensic.
And I agree that the police seem to be dropping subtle clues re the possible involvement of a woman. Early on after the arrest, one of the newspaper reports quoted the police as saying they are looking into the possible involvement of a female (but I think that's now been amended and removed - hard to keep track as they just update the same web article). Does anyone remember that? I suspect they know something more than what they're saying (as has obviously been the case all along!).
For all we know MH just invited DJK in because he felt sorry for him and thought 'why not just have a few beers with this guy' and things went haywire from there.
Firstly, this is not judgement on anyone's comments at all - as the same thoughts sprang into my mind as soon as I saw who was arrested.
So, I'm a Clinical Psychologist who specialised in working with adolescents (until I had children and went into private practice) - and I've just got to say that all of the judgements about DJK being 'nerdy', 'weedy', 'geeky' are very telling. It's what would have happened for him his whole life, I suspect. And it definitely would have worn him down. (combined with other stuff, I'm sure - this doesn't erupt out of nowhere!)
Even the way he has been compared unfavourably to MH, would have been familiar to him. He is just so far from the 'popular' guy that MH seems to represent. It's these kids, as we saw in Columbine, who just build and build rage inside and then explode.
Just my thoughts :twocents: