There is a lot of disgusting salivating going on in various media outlets right now.![]()
It’s like the victims are on trial?
Are we going to hear about all of Lynn’s relationships and medical conditions?
There is a lot of disgusting salivating going on in various media outlets right now.![]()
Yes I've been wondering what RH reported 'enlarged penis' medical condition has to do with anything!It’s like the victims are on trial?
Are we going to hear about all of Lynn’s relationships and medical conditions?
Daily Mail is a rag as it is but I'm not even going to click that... this is just another reason people will be laughing at the victims and the familyYes I've been wondering what RH reported 'enlarged penis' medical condition has to do with anything!
![]()
The ABSOLUTELY shocking reason love cheat camper was hospitalised
Slain camper Russell Hill was hospitalised after suffering depression and a painful personal problem, a court has heard.www.dailymail.co.uk
It seems like a lot of is coming from the prosecution? I’m so confused at their strategy right now.
Respectively edited....
I think it's possible that GL also shot RH. Unless he wanted to remove the bullet from his body, burning it to fragments might be one way of tampering with thedited evidence.
It is coming from prosecution witnesses, but it may be coming on cross examination by the defence and not in direct testimony. We are not hearing what questions are producing these answers.
A defence strategy can be to smear the victim(s) to the jury. Whether or not the information has anything to do with the crime. I think the strategy is used in rape cases at times.
imo
Agreed, but this was actual evidence from Robin Hill when she was in the witness box. Not made up by the newspaper. Just seems to a weird line of inquiry.Daily Mail is a rag as it is but I'm not even going to click that... this is just another reason people will be laughing at the victims and the family![]()
Yes I realised this afterwards. How much of that was really necessary? What did that have to do with Greg Lynn? So bloody ridiculous!!Agreed, but this was actual evidence from Robin Hill when she was in the witness box. Not made up by the newspaper. Just seems to a weird line of inquiry.
Defence lawyers know no bounds and apply no filter. Their sole focus is getting their client off and to hell with everybody else. Collateral damage isn't even a consideration.Seems the defence is trying to portray Russell and Carol in the most unsympathetic way they can.
And actually, she could have left it out, couldn't she?Agreed, but this was actual evidence from Robin Hill when she was in the witness box. Not made up by the newspaper. Just seems to a weird line of inquiry.
Stacey, I realise this must be terribly distressing for you, but I'd be most surprised if people were laughing at the victims. Robyn said that Russell had suffered from depression. We weren't in court so don't know how she came to disclose his very personal medical condition. Dann may have asked her under cross-examination why he had been depressed and that's when she disclosed that information.Daily Mail is a rag as it is but I'm not even going to click that... this is just another reason people will be laughing at the victims and the family![]()
Stacey, from what I've been reading across various media's, people are outraged & disgusted that many aspects of RH & CC's personal lives have been brought into scrutiny and they see it as unnecessary and nothing to do with the case. Also, unfortunately, journalism always goes for the salacious bits first to get peoples attention. It's called gutter journalism and not worthy to be read. I hope this helps a little.Daily Mail is a rag as it is but I'm not even going to click that... this is just another reason people will be laughing at the victims and the family![]()
I think the poor wife was just trying to be honest about the facts and was probably ambushed by the defence ... I totally get it it's unfair to the victims and their familiesJudgeJudi, Sher Lock. Thanks for your input. I realise my opinions are biased but I read some really terrible comments on the Facebook comments to the Daily Mail article links. Not just a couple but probably 20-30 per article. Some really horrible things... I know I am sensitive but things I would never say about anyone. I also understand this forum is based largely on speculation but it did bring me a fresh perspective on how to be a bit more sensitive when crimes occur, because one day it could be your family. News outlets will always be the way they are. But we as regular people can be in control of what we say.
Just my two cents.
Seems the defence is trying to portray Russell and Carol in the most unsympathetic way they can.
I'm fairly sure the prosecution was the one to ask Robynne Hill about his health.She was asked about his depression, and it was then that she talked about his physical problem. It was quite unexpected. She could have answered without mentioning his penis size.She could have been briefed better.I think the poor wife was just trying to be honest about the facts and was probably ambushed by the defence ... I totally get it it's unfair to the victims and their families![]()