Found Deceased Australia - Samuel Thompson, 22, Albion, Qld, 7 March 2017 *Arrests* #2

Status
Not open for further replies.
Police state that sam drove to boscianos and never left alive. Boscaino refused to reveal murder weapons or how he was killed. They said the victim and bosciano knew each other but dyball and boscaino didnt.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yup
See
My
Commemt


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
The article is saying that Sam didn't know AD. It makes no mention of RB and AD. They must have known each other.

He said he wasn't aware of Mr Dyball and Mr Thompson having any previous contact but said the victim and Mr Boscaino knew each other.

http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/que...onfirmed-as-sam-thompson-20170406-gvfma6.html

Ah true well
Taht doesn't correlate to what ppl have said they have seen sams car many times at dyballs house


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Yup
See
My
Commemt


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Nickers, in this quote from Brisbane Times: "He would not reveal the alleged murder weapon or details about how Mr Thompson died." don't you think that the "He" could be referring to Det. T, and not RB?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Ah true well
Taht doesn't correlate to what ppl have said they have seen sams car many times at dyballs house


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The people who know this if its true you should contact police and let them know


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Ah true well
Taht doesn't correlate to what ppl have said they have seen sams car many times at dyballs house


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The wording from LE is very distinctive imo - they say they weren't 'aware' of them having previous contact. That leaves the possibility open. They may still be working out all the connections.
 
Nickers, in this quote from Brisbane Times: "He would not reveal the alleged murder weapon or details about how Mr Thompson died." don't you think that the "He" could be referring to Det. T, and not RB?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Definitely. It's LE saying that, not Boscaino -

Detective Inspector Tim Trezise said police believed he drove to Mr Boscaino's home on Griffith Street, Bald Hills, but didn't leave alive.

He would not reveal the alleged murder weapon or details about how Mr Thompson died.


http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/que...onfirmed-as-sam-thompson-20170406-gvfma6.html
 
That is why WS doesnt allow rumors and require links. Its getting pretty crazy in this thread....IMO newbies need to go back over the rules.
 
That is why WS doesnt allow rumors and require links. Its getting pretty crazy in this thread....IMO newbies need to go back over the rules.

Yes, if you quote something from a news article, you need to put the link where it came from. And it's best to copy and paste the quote....then nothing can get misconstrued.

It takes a little while to work out the whole WS posting thing :seeya:
 
I'm wondering if nickers doesn't realise that if you quote something from a news article, you need to put the link where it came from. And it's best to copy and paste the quote....then nothing can get misconstrued.

It takes a little while to work out the whole WS posting thing :seeya:

TY. But if we cant discuss opinions ideas etc anything that isnt printed well im out. Whats the point.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
TY. But if we cant discuss opinions ideas etc anything that isnt printed well im out. Whats the point.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

No, I'm not saying that - we totally can.

But in the example above where a quote was attributed to RB when it was actually from a detective.....that's incorrect info getting spread.

I'm only talking about if you are referring to MSM articles - one of the WS rules is you have to provide a link.
 
TY. But if we cant discuss opinions ideas etc anything that isnt printed well im out. Whats the point.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Hence why I don't say anything. They wouldnt know **** without the locals and they dont have back up links LOL.
 
If dyball doesnt know bosciano y on earth was he partipating in a murder


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
IMO Either something happened between RB and ST and then RB called AD for help in a panic. Or AD and RB were out together and came across ST got into altercation that led them back to RB's house and things went bad.

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk
 
So bosciano lured him to his house?? Had dyball as a stand over man as previously mentioned?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
No where does it say he was "lured".

RB is at the center knowing both AD and ST.


Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
186
Guests online
544
Total visitors
730

Forum statistics

Threads
625,593
Messages
18,506,773
Members
240,819
Latest member
Berloni75
Back
Top