GUILTY Australia - Sarah Cafferkey, 22, Melbourne, 9th Nov 2012, #1

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #201
  • #202
I think we know who that could be ....
 
  • #203
I want to know why. Why beautiful young Sarah????? :( :( :( :(
 
  • #204
either way here seems like the best place for discussion about this, that facebook page has just turned into a flame war. I'm done there!

You are more than welcome to be here JG. We pride ourselves on mature input and discussion and do not indulge in irresponsible flame wars. Please stay as your contributions are soundly based and really valued.
 
  • #205
I guess we will be moving on over to the located forum. :(


:dunno:

May have to wait for offical forensic ID of remains.... Its just so so sad

:(
 
  • #206
  • #207
  • #208
  • #209
  • #210
The Investigator Charlie Bezzina examines Sarah Cafferkey murder investigation

Herald Sun November 19, 2012 1:17PM

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/la...519577326?sv=51f9da12e9785292aeae9b0db4a8d3ea

Great article. I love reading Charlie's reports. It is frustrating that they are not keeping us 'in the loop' when you compare it to Jill's investigation. The police admitted that they took a big risk in releasing the CCTV footage of Jill and the suspect. In the end, the public played a big role in the identification of her murderer. I know it is for good and strategic reasons though. Still can't help but be frustrated.
 
  • #211
  • #212
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=9abPEfFVyOU
Sarah Cafferkey plays with school friend November 19, 2012: A video from Sarah Cafferkey's MySpace page, uploaded in 2007, showing her playing with a friend from school. Friends have posted touching tributes on social media after police said..

snap, ezender!
 
  • #213
Twitter: It appears that the person wanted in relation to Sarah Cafferkey is initials SH

David ‏@politicotab
 
  • #214
Twitter: It appears that the person wanted in relation to Sarah Cafferkey is initials SH

David ‏@politicotab


As we have suspected. Thanks to JG's sleuthing :)

Good job on finding that too PH!
 
  • #215
I think we will have an arrest within 24 hours! Especially if the call into work was from a mobile phone!

However, Victoria Police have requested that the names and photographs of the men not be published.

Fairfax spoke to the employer of one of the men this afternoon and was told he had called work this morning and said he "wouldn't be in today."


Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/t...dy-in-house-20121118-29kd9.html#ixzz2CdeyomEd

:jail:
 
  • #216
I think we will have an arrest within 24 hours! Especially if the call into work was from a mobile phone!

However, Victoria Police have requested that the names and photographs of the men not be published.

Fairfax spoke to the employer of one of the men this afternoon and was told he had called work this morning and said he "wouldn't be in today."


Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/t...dy-in-house-20121118-29kd9.html#ixzz2CdeyomEd

:jail:


Fingers crossed! Justice for Sarah!!! :please:
 
  • #217
Definitely sounds like they are closing in.
 
  • #218
I think we will have an arrest within 24 hours! Especially if the call into work was from a mobile phone!

However, Victoria Police have requested that the names and photographs of the men not be published.

Fairfax spoke to the employer of one of the men this afternoon and was told he had called work this morning and said he "wouldn't be in today."


Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/t...dy-in-house-20121118-29kd9.html#ixzz2CdeyomEd

:jail:


note the use of the plural men. I would guess one is the prime suspect and one or two others are accessories possibly
 
  • #219
  • #220
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
166
Guests online
1,248
Total visitors
1,414

Forum statistics

Threads
632,401
Messages
18,625,932
Members
243,135
Latest member
AgentMom
Back
Top