So the "He sat down, he chatted, he had a dance and that was it" statement doesn't indicate at all that Theo did anything wrong to deserve being asked to leave the venue.
And security asked him to leave. Why? I hope police have questioned those working security that night. /QUOTE]
They have. He was 'intoxicated'. That doesn't mean that he was rolling over drunk or being a nuisance. He looked 'ok' leaving to me. I'd divert off course if I was looking at a phone. He was aware of the pole enough to avoid it. I'm not claiming he wasn't intoxicated but that he didn't appear to be 'drunk' . No licensed premises can have an intoxicated person on the premises. It's a bit of a catch since they can offer them a non-alcoholic drink and have a duty but can't have them there.
The bouncers there, according to reviews, are strict on that (no implication of wrongdoing intended).
He had two drinks there according to reports so alcohol must have been consumed before.