Bohemian
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 6, 2015
- Messages
- 10,370
- Reaction score
- 16,631
There are many variables when it comes to the rate of decomposition of human remains, such as temperature, humidity, if the remains are buried, left exposed to the elements and scavengers (and types of scavengers) such as insects, etc, or disposed of in water.I have a question about forensics and autopsies. I don’t know enough about this subject tbh. One thing that I find confusing is in 2016 DCI Cullen says they couldn’t get a line on when or how the body in a bag died, but his best “guesstimate” is two to three weeks. They mention how badly decomposed the body was as well.
Now in the Gaby Petito case in the USA they have released her cause of death as strangulation, and estimate she died 3 to 4 weeks previous to being found.
How can they tell the way Gaby died after 3-4 weeks yet can’t establish anything in the body in a bag case here?
Is it a case of it being a decade ago, and forensics have advanced enough in that time? Is it a case of yes our police know a lot more then they’re letting on? Are there different procedures in different countries? Is it a case of Different climates make decomposition happen faster etc?
it just confuses me that the body in the bag was so badly decomposed they can’t tell a thing, and we’re told at best guess he was dead 2-3 weeks, yet They can tell Gaby was strangled, and even that she wasn’t pregnant after 3-4 weeks of decomposition.
Decomposition – The Forensics Library
(Not being overly familiar with the circumstances of Gaby’s case, my guess that the reason it was possible to identify that she had been strangled was that her remains were preserved by being exposed to the arid, desert conditions in which she was found, whereas our Tumbulgum Man was found in a more humid, tropical environment making an autopsy more problematic).
Last edited: