Some things that stood out to me from the ABC report in addition to
@Arboreal excellent summary (thank you for that insightful link!)
According to this quote there seem to be contradictions in the sisters behavior. “In late January, the sisters sent him an anxious email asking him to check the building’s CCTV cameras, as they feared their food delivery had been tampered with.
They told him they were planning to contact the police. When he checked the cameras, Michael found nothing.”
Here, the sisters were claiming to want to contact police. Yet shortly afterwards when Michael requested a welfare check the girls told police they didn’t want them involved. This was a perfect opportunity for them to stress their concerns. Next, the sisters contacted Michael on multiple occasions seeking his help for their fears (keyed car, food tampering, man watching them). When Michael showed up to their apartment under the guise of looking for leaks, then told them he was concerned for them and asked what was wrong, they refused to speak a single word to him. What sparked the changes in behavior? My own words, but “We plan to contact police” to police showing up and “no, we’re fine and don’t want you involved”. And “Michael, bad things are happening, please help us.” to “we won’t speak to you, please leave.”
He noticed no one else there, but could they have gone to the balcony to hide? Could the girls not at least secretly plea for help?
Secondly, under a photo of the service saltation it said the girls hadn’t been there for over 3 months. My timing may be off but I believe that is before their death so why did they stop coming in when previously they’d go multiple times a day for coffee and energy drinks? Because of money or something else?
Lastly, how weird (or maybe a bit of paranoia on their part) that the journalists mentioned a car slowing to photograph them and make sure they noticed. What do we make of that? The private investigator the girls mentioned?