Australia - Warriena Wright, 26, dies in balcony fall, Surfers Paradise, Aug 2014 #10

[CleverKnot]

I'm afraid the "thanks" you receive are not statistically significant, and any conclusions you draw are inherently flawed.

Unless you take into the fact, they are predominantly male. It's no conspiracy. Fact is fact.

 

[ninij9]

Well then, if we can't consider what was said, there is zero proof she ever tried to hit him, much less connected.

Boom.

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk

 

[Freya1977]

Unless you take into the fact, they are predominantly male. It's no conspiracy. Fact is fact.

You do not know what gender posters are, so no, that is not "fact", it's assumption.

 

[CleverKnot]

so the jury are expected to disregard what he told her, which includes threatening to throw her over the balcony, in a murder trial where someone "went over the balcony and died???" make perfect sense to me! not!!!!! :banghead::banghead::banghead:

Did he throw her off the balcony?

Thus, the need to look at the facts.

 

[jessicalouise]

Did he throw her off the balcony?

Thus, the need to look at the facts.

He didn't get a chance to, she'd already tried to make her escape by then. But he certainly talked about doing so.

 

[fairydust]

It's interesting to compare his behaviour in the DUI car chase to his behaviour in this one.

I mean, there were -other people- in that car! He could've killed them.. could've killed police officers... could've killed other drivers... Gave not 1 sh_t about any of 'em, just took off and hang the consequences. Probably thought it was a real good time, lol brahs.

Coulda just pulled over for the cops.

Coulda let her leave the two tmes she said she was going... coulda put her out the front door/called police/whatever.

Coulda.. shoulda... Fact is, he just lives for the thrills and lulz of it all, in the moment. What he feels later, I don't know.. and don't particularly care.

Since you brought it up, yes it is interesting.

• the other people in the car chose to be in the car with him
• they were at the concert with him in Noosa, and they knew he was drunk. they were drunk too , they designated him as their driver.
• if they deemed his driving to be inappropriate, they could have made him pull over and exit the vehicle.

So do you see the parallel? Actions and responsibility - had they crashed the passengers would have born a large percentage of responsibility for electing to be driven by a drunk person.

Similar actions here - refusal to leave when ordered to do so is an abrogation of responsibility. Seriously assaulting someone in their home with a heavy metal object is an abrogation of responsibility. And so on.

So you made good point. Thank you.

 

[CleverKnot]

Which I do.

So the being a bad girl comment is tormenting her, or trying to appeal to the side that liked him at one point, and remind her of the sex they just shared?

I suspect, you'll now skew to the evil interpretation.

 

[Oddsocks]

The problem is that there aren't many facts in this case.

 

[matey]

This ^ Exactly. He had already threatened her. But we're meant to give him the benefit of the doubt that he didn't really mean for her to go off the balcony? He just gets a free pass. Why would he say it??

This Trial has been so unlike any other that we've shared here on WS....So frustrating....MOO..:gaah::banghead::rollercoaster::crazy::hanging:

 

[Ausgirl]

I know what is with that??? why on earth "wasn't" there a forensic analysis of the tape??? I mean they are using the tape as evidence in court...why wasn't it forensically analysed???? tt IS relevant, the most relevant part of this whole trial!

I -could- be snide and point out that this is QLD we're dealing with.

But I won't. =p

 

[Safeguard]

I fail to see how you arrived at those very narrow definitions.

I've expressed that I feel nothing but empathy for what she was experiencing/B], and at the same time, am able to empathize with him. Much of our individual logic, is based on our emotional experiences.

We have alao seen the narrow minded side with him using some very fuzzy logic, and simply based on his gender.

You can see it here and elsewhere that the differing opinions and their "thanks" are split quite heavily into gender groups.

BBM
You say that, but I'm not not really feeling it. Your posts don't come across to me, as empathic to anyone who isnt...Male. Jmo

 

[jessicalouise]

GT had a fixation with the balcony and had mentioned throwing girls off the balcony numerous times. Threatening it, joking about it. Picking one up on the balcony and scaring her so much she fled.

How convenient that one manages to fall and thus he gets his desired outcome without having to physically throw someone to their death. A bit too convenient.

 

[bluesneakers]

How do you know? Do you assume they are male based on posting style? I seem to be being ignored lol

Clicking thanks wasn't enough!

 

[barcode]

So the being a bad girl comment is tormenting her, or trying to appeal to the side that liked him at one point, and remind her of the sex they just shared?

I suspect, you'll now skew to the evil interpretation.

I'll bite even though I am confused by the thought process, I do not think it weighed any on her mind, one way or another.

 

[Freya1977]

Clicking thanks wasn't enough!

I've asked 3 times. He won't answer me but continues to assert that he knows our gender. Lol

 

[jessicalouise]

The problem is that there aren't many facts in this case.

There are many facts, people are just choosing to ignore them in place of ~well i *feel* he may have called the police to have escorted her out~ even though there is absolutely nothing to even suggest such a thing.

 

[Ausgirl]

Since you brought it up, yes it is interesting.

• the other people in the car chose to be in the car with him
• they were at the concert with him in Noosa, and they knew he was drunk. they were drunk too , they designated him as their driver.
• if they deemed his driving to be inappropriate, they could have made him pull over and exit the vehicle.

So do you see the parallel? Actions and responsibility - had they crashed the passengers would have born a large percentage of responsibility for electing to be driven by a drunk person.

Similar actions here - refusal to leave when ordered to do so is an abrogation of responsibility. Seriously assaulting someone in their home with a heavy metal object is an abrogation of responsibility. And so on.

So you made good point. Thank you.

Coulda just pulled over for the cops.

Didn't.

Coulda just called the cops, let her out the front door.

Didn't.

But you can choose to take that as you want, as can I. The most basic level of common sense is pretty much on my side here though.

 

[Bohemian]

Ah, yes. The male jurors will likely hunt the majestic logic beast, while the female jurors will use berries to make ink so they can journal about their synchronized periods.

*sound of hammer hitting nail* :floorlaugh:

ETA: That should be WS' 'Comment of the Day' right there. :floorlaugh: Ow my belly hurts :floorlaugh:

Thanks for the birthday gift of laughter *hands everyone glasses of their favourite tipple and pieces of cake*

I'm printing your post and keeping it as a memento.

 

[CleverKnot]

Oh ffs lol

I see.

What do you think he was about to do?

 

[TheOtherChristina]

He didn't get a chance to, she'd already tried to make her escape by then. But he certainly talked about doing so.

Exactly. And it's entirely possible that his three (or more?) references to the balcony had made her very wary of his intentions.

Certainly, in her position, I would be wondering why he kept bringing it up and if it related at all to his sudden and ominous tonal shift.