BBM. That is certainly not the case as far as I'm concerned. My opinion on BS's involvement in William's disappearance has absolutely nothing to do with the historical sex charges. The police have had BS in their sites as a person of interest from the beginning. They've invested many man hours, time and money in their investigation. They do not do that on a whim. I feel sure that they have a lot more evidence that will eventually be revealed.
I don't think Hillsley has almost admitted sexually assaulting the little girls BS is accused of sexually assaulting. It is all supposition. We don't know how many nieces Hillsley has and we don't know if he was actually living with the said victims in January 1987. All of this is assumed because of what we've read in MSM and Hillsley's court record. It's joining the dots but it doesn't always give a complete picture. I'm looking forward to Spedding's upcoming days in court and hopefully the truth will finally be revealed one way or the other.
I agree with Makara....they would have investigated a lot of people who were in the vicinity (including family or foster family etc) but who did they name (lets not forget they actually NAMED HIM) as a POI from the start? I dont see anyone else being named as a POI. Just because he doesnt look sinister we have discounted him. I work in the sports industry with kids and as I have said before, it is an old-fashioned concept to think that you have to simply worry about that dirty old man in the corner. The people you worry about most are those who gain your trust and those of your children and appear to be the nice friendly next door type. People might not want to hear it but it is a reality. Teachers, child care workers, coaches, scout leaders....I dont need to go on...it gives me the horrors just thinking about it.