Australia Australia - William Tyrrell, 3, Kendall, NSW, 12 Sept 2014 - #15

[louisepiglet]

The one person who really knows if BS was really having coffee with her and was at the school with her is MS. But she still had to consult a psychic regarding his involvement with William's abduction.

 

[bearbear]

just thinking little williams asthma may be worse in september with spring and all the pollen etc, so wondering if he had an asthma attack when he was abducted?

 

[Karo]

That may have been for the benefit of others. I have been to a psychic, I asked questions that I already knew the answers to.
If police had any inkling that he was not where he was supposed to be, wouldn't they arrest him?

The one person who really knows if BS was really having coffee with her and was at the school with her is MS. But she still had to consult a psychic regarding his involvement with William's abduction.

 

[TrueSlueth]

That may have been for the benefit of others. I have been to a psychic, I asked questions that I already knew the answers to.
If police had any inkling that he was not where he was supposed to be, wouldn't they arrest him?

I'd say Jubelin doesnt want a repeat of the Bowraville situation where there was not enough evidence to convict T Hart.

 

[Karo]

Let's hope Jubelin knows more than he is telling then.

 

[blefuscu]

That may have been for the benefit of others. I have been to a psychic, I asked questions that I already knew the answers to.
If police had any inkling that he was not where he was supposed to be, wouldn't they arrest him?

Have you ever asked a psychic if your husband, who you were supposed to be drinking coffee with and attending a school assembly with has abducted a 3 year old?

That's hardly a "I'll test the psychic's ability" question is it?

 

[Karo]

I very much doubt she asked that question. A more likely one would be "was my husband involved in any way with the disappearance of William Tyrrell?"However, I don't know what she asked.

Have you ever asked a psychic if your husband, who you were supposed to be drinking coffee with and attending a school assembly with has abducted a 3 year old?

That's hardly a "I'll test the psychic's ability" question is it?

 

[Alex1906]

Hi Hilly, I think those pics of the cars are from google streetview May 2008 aren't they?

https://www.google.com.au/maps/@-31...XSRSG15px84EOxNVYeg!2e0!7i3328!8i1664!6m1!1e1

Good on you for passing it on to crimestoppers anyway.

Hi All - new here. I believe Hilly found the cars. Look at this again. It does say 2014. Now, look where it says 2008 in the top left corner. Click on it and it brings up a different picture from 2008 of the same street/angle.

 

[Lemony]

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/new...s-for-other-kids/story-e6frg6nf-1227308714564

'A relative of the couple, Colin Youngberry, said Ms Spedding played him a tape recording of the conversation, in which the clairvoyant said her husband was not involved in what took place.

“That made her feel good,” Mr Youngberry said.'

How did she feel before visiting the clairvoyant I wonder?

 

[crabstick]

I would pay good money to see the psychics face when she asked the question. Did my husband abduct Spiderman?

Im sensing you have a pet that has passed


Nope, your husband did not abduct Spiderman

Have you ever asked a psychic if your husband, who you were supposed to be drinking coffee with and attending a school assembly with has abducted a 3 year old?

That's hardly a "I'll test the psychic's ability" question is it?

 

[blefuscu]

I very much doubt she asked that question. A more likely one would be "was my husband involved in any way with the disappearance of William Tyrrell?"However, I don't know what she asked.

Semantics. If she KNEW she was with him all that time why would she even ask? She would know for sure he wasn't.

 

[crabstick]

I havent checked, but I would say the watermark denotes the date of the image dataset. In this case, 2014. The image would be copyrighted according the date it was taken, not prior as it would be illegal. Google would know.

Hi All - new here. I believe Hilly found the cars. Look at this again. It does say 2014. Now, look where it says 2008 in the top left corner. Click on it and it brings up a different picture from 2008 of the same street/angle.

 

[Wexford]

Semantics. If she KNEW she was with him all that time why would she even ask? She would know for sure he wasn't.

Unless of course she WAS with him but thought he could have still had some involvement....as do many of us.

 

[Freddo Frog]

I vaguely remember us all here discussing this ...... I think I might have just mentioned that the description/scenario Jubelin plays out in the article could be based on facts... possibly..... and I may (Can't recall) have said someone may have come forward saying they saw a car with the top of a child's head.....all purely speculation on my part.


Jublelin sees it, you open the door and you put him in the car. Perhaps your first thought is to return him to his parents. Certainly, if anyone saw you now, you could say you were driving him to the police station in Laurieton, 15 minutes away. Instead of knocking on doors, you head back out past the showground. No one *follows you. You cross the Camden Haven River and nobody notices young William with the seatbelt over him. You bypass the police station in Laurieton and you just keep driving. By the time William’s mother calls 000 you are 30km away. There are tens of thousands of hectares of dense bushland between you and Kendall. *William is strapped in beside you, dressed in his Spider-Man suit.

det jubelin is quite specific with the seatbelt mention isnt he, maybe someone did see a little boy in the front seat of a vehicle that day?

Thank you. That is what I was thinking of. I find it interesting how little snippets of reported information is coming back around at this late stage.

Here are my thoughts on the two cars...

LE know who they belong to
LE know who was in them that day
LE are now looking for more witnesses to verify that those cars were there

I really think that once another witness can place those two cars there, then an arrest/s will be made

'imo'

My thoughts, too.

Yeah ....mmm...Going to have to admit I'm not entirely sure what your getting at Crab.

I was using the example of the Bung case to indicate that sometimes police will hold off releasing information to the public, especially if the evidence is particularly important to the investigation. In Bungs case they withheld the information of the car sighting for almost three Years...

I just happened to be freaked out when I realised the car in Bungs case.... also resembles one of the cars in Williams case .... that's all...

And yeah ....not sure what you mean about that vehicle been commonly used in crime ... I wouldn't have thought a 1994-1996 ford falcon station wagons are the choice vehicle for crims JMIO..... Commodore Sedan Yes....

Agree, Puggle.

Not sure about where everyone else lives but where I live most cars used in the commission of a crime are generally random selections - the keys were in the car, it was left running and unattended, the keys were taken as part of a house break-in.

I disagree. A drug dealer has just been done down the road about 2 years ago, up the street from a school, in a dead end street renting a $1.4 million dollar house. I guess it depends the amount etc. He tried getting back in the same house. The neighbours rang the cops.

I live in a semi-rural area, we have houses nearby who have been raided a number of times. We've had houses in built up areas in the nearest town/city that have been raided. I don't think the value of the house has anything to do with raids. I've worked on providing information in a previous occupation on rented sheds in an industrial area that were involved in making/growing drugs. Some were un-sgned premises, others were signed as a particular business. I guess that anyone can be a drug dealer anywhere.

Do the worst paedophile said ever get given a new identity when they are finally released from prison, and can they change their name by deed poll?

I think there was a high profile one in the past few years who got a new name, I'm thinking Ferguson but I could be wrong.

 

[blefuscu]

Unless of course she WAS with him but thought he could have still had some involvement....as do many of us.

The timings should rule him out though, no? He can't be abducting a 3 year old in Kendall while drinking coffee with his wife miles away at the same time. If his alibi was watertight the police would have moved on from him long ago. There's obviously something not quite adding up.

He may be perfectly innocent but he seems to get himself linked to cases involving children.

 

[Karo]

I would suppose that the abduction was not a random event, going by all the other scenarios that have been put forward.
I also suppose it depends what her actual question was.
I think she knows exactly where he was that day.
BTW, I wasn't testing the psychic's abilities, I was double checking my recollection of events, sometimes memories are not exactly what we remember them to be.

Semantics. If she KNEW she was with him all that time why would she even ask? She would know for sure he wasn't.

 

[Karo]

Thank you. That is what I was thinking of. I find it interesting how little snippets of reported information is coming back around at this late stage.



My thoughts, too.





Agree, Puggle.

Not sure about where everyone else lives but where I live most cars used in the commission of a crime are generally random selections - the keys were in the car, it was left running and unattended, the keys were taken as part of a house break-in.



I live in a semi-rural area, we have houses nearby who have been raided a number of times. We've had houses in built up areas in the nearest town/city that have been raided. I don't think the value of the house has anything to do with raids. I've worked on providing information in a previous occupation on rented sheds in an industrial area that were involved in making/growing drugs. Some were un-sgned premises, others were signed as a particular business. I guess that anyone can be a drug dealer anywhere.




I think there was a high profile one in the past few years who got a new name, I'm thinking Ferguson but I could be wrong.

I think he was moved to a secret location but I don't recall he got a new name. I think they are on their own when released but monitored.

 

[Wexford]

The timings should rule him out though, no? He can't be abducting a 3 year old in Kendall while drinking coffee with his wife miles away at the same time. If his alibi was watertight the police would have moved on from him long ago. There's obviously something not quite adding up.

He may be perfectly innocent but he seems to get himself linked to cases involving children.

Yes TWICE (that we know of). Actually I would be interested to know if he has form for anything else.

 

[sosocurious]

http://media.goodfood.com.au/news/n...edding-denies-tyrell-involvement-6191917.html

I know we have all seen/listened to this many times but I do wonder what the Behavioral Sciences Team were thinking.

Reporter - Did you have anything to do with William Tyrrells disappearance?
BS - NO
Reporter - Have you ever seen the little boy?
BS - pause ....The media have reported that correctly......

Reporter - What do you want to say to the Tyrrell family?
MS - This is unbelievable ... and they shuffle off toward the car and BS lets go of her hand.

 

[Wexford]

Hi All - new here. I believe Hilly found the cars. Look at this again. It does say 2014. Now, look where it says 2008 in the top left corner. Click on it and it brings up a different picture from 2008 of the same street/angle.

Can I also say that looking at those pictures from different angles trying to see who was inside really creeped me out.