so would this visit to grandmothers be a changeover visit, custodial parent giving children over to the non custodial parent for the school holidays? i wonder whose mother the grandmother is and why everyone meet up there?
I have also repeatedly wondered about the reliability of sniffer dogs, but I also know little about them. I'm not sure what they would/not have picked up in the yard and contaminated areas closer to the house: William's scent PLUS that of heaps of others', or just a mix of everything all in one. Also wonder whether, as someone else pondered, whether a child emits less scent than an adult. Also wondered whether the scent may have been 'blocked' by something, like if William was wedged under a huge boulder or something...
I think back to the David Iredale search in the Blue Mtns in late 2006 - can't recall if they used dogs or not - but many people were searching but he was under some boulder and it later transpired that many people had walked past that place many times...
But, it's not like they did just one search in the bush for William. Not sure how many times they took the dogs in, but msm has reported that some places were searched up to ten times!
The police keep saying they reckon they would have found him, if he were in the bush. But they are also going to go back and do intermittent sweeps of the area around Benaroon Drive... I wonder what that's all about?
Oddsocks drew it during the trial
Sorry, this was in reply to "they'll get you"
I have removed several posts sleuthing the family, talking about facebooks that cannot be linked at this time or speculating on foster/bio family connections.
None of this is allowed at this time. MSM has said that for legal reasons the family cannot be identified. We don't know what those reasons are but we are going to follow the lead of MSM and we are NOT going to identify the families here.
I know you guys are good sleuths and you probably already have 90% of that information, but you cannot post it or discuss here until the legal issues are resolved or we understand better why the family can't be identified.
Please keep the info to yourselves for now.
Thank you,
Salem
There is a good reason that this family is not meant to be identified - we've been asked not to do this.
I have also repeatedly wondered about the reliability of sniffer dogs, but I also know little about them. I'm not sure what they would/not have picked up in the yard and contaminated areas closer to the house: William's scent PLUS that of heaps of others', or just a mix of everything all in one. Also wonder whether, as someone else pondered, whether a child emits less scent than an adult. Also wondered whether the scent may have been 'blocked' by something, like if William was wedged under a huge boulder or something...
I think back to the David Iredale search in the Blue Mtns in late 2006 - can't recall if they used dogs or not - but many people were searching but he was under some boulder and it later transpired that many people had walked past that place many times...
But, it's not like they did just one search in the bush for William. Not sure how many times they took the dogs in, but msm has reported that some places were searched up to ten times!
The police keep saying they reckon they would have found him, if he were in the bush. But they are also going to go back and do intermittent sweeps of the area around Benaroon Drive... I wonder what that's all about?
Does anyone have the link handy where Nicole spoke?
Just can't think of a case where family identity suppressed ? Correct me if I'm wrong
2 different ones here
A close family friend of William's devastated parents, named Nicole, said they are 'desperate'
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...avourite-Spiderman-costume.html#ixzz3E7VkhVce
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...missing-grandparents-house-FIVE-days-ago.html
High profile parent? Politician? Police officer? Prison Officer? just to think of a few?
I'm watching Nicole's interviews and everytime someone asks about "the parents" she answers "the family"
I would guess that's because she can't mention names, and I guess it is on behalf of the family