Australia Australia - William Tyrrell, 3, Kendall, NSW, 12 Sept 2014 - #20

[PainExpress]

Smoke. Fire. That's enough for me.

BS can burn for all i care.

Obviously been a bottom feeder most of his life. Pawn broker. Washing machine repairer.

 

[Found]

Smoke. Fire. That's enough for me.

BS can burn for all i care.

Obviously been a bottom feeder most of his life. Pawn broker. Washing machine repairer.

What the hell is a bottom feeder? If it's what I think it is seriously wtf. Unfortunately where there is smoke there is fire attitudes ruin rational arguments. No helpful.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[louisepiglet]

Smoke. Fire. That's enough for me.

BS can burn for all i care.

Obviously been a bottom feeder most of his life. Pawn broker. Washing machine repairer.

Wow. That's a bit mean. What is wrong with being a washing machine repairer.

 

[frogwell]

smoke. Fire. That's enough for me.

Bs can burn for all i care.

Obviously been a bottom feeder most of his life. Pawn broker. Washing machine repairer.

roflmao

 

[deugirtni]

With all due respect, it has absolutely nothing to do with grocery shopping. That's just a simile that was used. What it is about, is child shopping.

<modsnip> I am merely proposing that when it comes to child and child sex abuse, the in-person options are not anywhere similar, and are very very limited, if they even exist at all.

 

[Wexford]

What the hell is a bottom feeder? If it's what I think it is seriously wtf. Unfortunately where there is smoke there is fire attitudes ruin rational arguments. No helpful.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I think what PainExpress means by 'bottom feeder' is something that feeds off the bottom of the pond....pond scum.

 

[SouthAussie]

<modsnip> I am merely proposing that when it comes to child and child sex abuse, the in-person options are not anywhere similar, and are very very limited, if they even exist at all.

It was me that used the shopping example. I agree to disagree with you.

 

[asac]

Smoke. Fire. That's enough for me.

BS can burn for all i care.

Obviously been a bottom feeder most of his life. Pawn broker. Washing machine repairer.

Karma would have your washing machine break down tomorrow.

 

[bearbear]

bs says he did nothing to harm william, so was he the scout for the others, alerting them two children with a "complicated" past would be easy pickings?
did the mattress and computer they took from his flat above the pawn shop contain evidence of his and associates deviant behaviour, theres been no statement regarding his possessions being cleared [tj car was cleared] and hes still a poi, i think there are so many inconsistencies and lies and coincidences with bs, its hard not to believe hes guilty of something!

 

[SouthAussie]

bs says he did nothing to harm william, so was he the scout for the others, alerting them two children with a "complicated" past would be easy pickings?
did the mattress and computer they took from his flat above the pawn shop contain evidence of his and associates deviant behaviour, theres been no statement regarding his possessions being cleared [tj car was cleared] and hes still a poi, i think there are so many inconsistencies and lies and coincidences with bs, its hard not to believe hes guilty of something!

BBM: I don&#8217;t think they think they harm these children in many instances, so I sort of disregard that statement by Spedding. Did he ever say that he didn&#8217;t take William? I can&#8217;t recall that happening, but maybe it did.

Maybe sexual abuse happened to these sickos as kids, and they turned out alright (in their eyes)
Maybe they think the children will just &#8216;get over&#8217; this damaging, disgusting abuse. After all, they are getting &#8216;special&#8217; attention, aren&#8217;t they? :stormingmad:

Maybe they do not even consider harm, just their own gratification. I believe they were at the very end of the line when people&#8217;s consciences were being given out. They just don&#8217;t have one.

 

[sosocurious]

&#8220;I would just like to let him know he has our full support. We feel he is innocent in this situation,&#8221; Mr Spedding&#8217;s niece Kylie Handsaker said.
&#8220;We know him so well. We know he is a loving, caring family man who would do anything for his wife and grand kids.
&#8220;I grew up in the area so I have been praying about the little boy who had gone missing and all I pray is that some truth comes out. I really believe that no one in my family has any involvement in this.&#8221;

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/ne...y/news-story/de17652fc9dc19f9cdaab2d68d2bdf18

This situation - I assume that BS niece meant the disappearance of William.
Because there was another investigation taking place ... FACS ... his treatment of children which resulted in the children being removed from the home.

No one in the family has any involvement .... families are spread out these days and so complicated.
imo

 

[PainExpress]

Karma would have your washing machine break down tomorrow.

It did last month already

 

[Wexford]

BBM: I don’t think they think they harm these children in many instances, so I sort of disregard that statement by Spedding. Did he ever say that he didn’t take William? I can’t recall that happening, but maybe it did.

Maybe sexual abuse happened to these sickos as kids, and they turned out alright (in their eyes)
Maybe they think the children will just ‘get over’ this damaging, disgusting abuse. After all, they are getting ‘special’ attention, aren’t they? :stormingmad:

Maybe they do not even consider harm, just their own gratification. I believe they were at the very end of the line when people’s consciences were being given out. They just don’t have one.

You make a good point South Aussie. And BS's wording is odd to say the least. The issue was the child was missing firstly and foremost and abduction was being thrown around as the main theory. Wouldn't you say "I have nothing to do with his disappearance"? I dunno....but I do think sometimes what people 'don't' say is more telling.

 

[sosocurious]

How&#8217;s he handling it, we ask?
&#8220;To tell you the truth I wouldn&#8217;t know what it is bloody well like,&#8221; Youngberry says. &#8220;I mean everyone is comin&#8217; out and tellin&#8217; him he&#8217;s basically murdered a kid. I mean, ****, not only kidnapped him but [/B

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/new...sh-into-thin-air/story-e6frg6n6-1227308929078

Of all the info and opinion Colin's offered this sentence has stayed with me.
Everyone is tellin him ..... ?????

 

[Bohemian]

For those who are unable to find information on, and doubt the existence of, child sexual exploitation rings, child rings, child sex trafficking rings or child prostitution rings, those terms typed into any search engine will yield a copious number of links to organisations who investigate them, such as the FBI, for example:

https://www.fbi.gov/about-us/investigate/vc_majorthefts/cac/innocencelost#disablemobile

 

[Bohemian]

<modsnip> I am merely proposing that when it comes to child and child sex abuse, the in-person options are not anywhere similar, and are very very limited, if they even exist at all.

FYI. This publication is all you will ever need to know about 'child molesters', (all 212 pages of it):

http://www.missingkids.org/en_US/publications/NC70.pdf

 

[bearbear]

because a lot of paedophiles have access to their own or children in their care, they have no need to steal a child, and if they have no child in their family i imagine its quite easy to spot a neglected or lonely neighbourhood child to befriend and groom with gifts and babysitting etc, or they work with children or belong to clubs or sport groups as coaches scout masters etc, so it does seem quite odd in this case that these named pois would need to steal a child, because most of them had ready access in their families or clubs etc. unless as the profiler suggested the perp may have thought of doing this for a long time and couldnt abuse children in their own family?
i wonder if william was taken to order and someone paid for him or was he taken because he seemed an easy target because he was a foster child, did they think he wasnt as precious as a child in a bio family ?

 

[SouthAussie]

You make a good point South Aussie. And BS's wording is odd to say the least. The issue was the child was missing firstly and foremost and abduction was being thrown around as the main theory. Wouldn't you say "I have nothing to do with his disappearance"? I dunno....but I do think sometimes what people 'don't' say is more telling.

Yes, there is even a name for it. Lying by omission. It is not uncommon.

 

[Rayemonde]

For those who are unable to find information on, and doubt the existence of, child sexual exploitation rings, child rings, child sex trafficking rings or child prostitution rings, those terms typed into any search engine will yield a copious number of links to organisations who investigate them, such as the FBI, for example:

https://www.fbi.gov/about-us/investigate/vc_majorthefts/cac/innocencelost#disablemobile

I know they exist, but I haven't been able to find any instances of them abducting random young children... The amount of police resources and the media coverage that accompany a child abduction make it too risky. When pedophiles do snatch young children it's usually a pedophile working alone, not as part of an organised ring that plans to snatch children...

 

[Angeline]

There have been a lot of attempted abductions lately, although we never seem to hear more about was involved or if they were in a pedo ring.

The attempts have involved kids who were old enough to get away.