http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/ne...s/news-story/0b7546b860a0fed80a8da818fc0e98db
Victims statements and medical reports are believed to be part of the polices case against Spedding.
I thought they couldn't find the medical reports? We're they found? Interesting
Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk
Ahhhhhhh okIt was the original police interview of BS that could not be found.
All I can say is I feel so terribly sorry for Spedding's alleged victims when this finally goes to trial. They were little girl's back in 1987 when these alleged crimes took place. They were aged six and three. Tiny little girls who should never have been exposed to any of this ****! Yet almost 30 years later they are prepared to bear witness to what allegedly took place at the hands of Spedding in 1987. The defense will tear this two girls to shreads! Spedding will walk. Be prepared for that great big "I've been acquitted" grin on Spedding's face when it is all done and dusted.
In the interim, does any this bring us any closer to what happened to William? Not one iota!
I can't help but wonder if offering a reward would prompt those that know even just the tiniest little bit of information to come forward. Sad that people would have to be paid for their information but money does talk.
I wonder.....I have many theories but I do wonder if these cases are more closely related than we know.....I wonder if this court case will be the catalyst for the missing pieces of the puzzle to come to light.
maybe there is no reward offered because police already know who/what happened?
maybe the person who should come forward is involved in what happened, in planning etc
or they arent motivated by money, they are wealthy and dont want to lose social standing?
or in a happy scenario....
they truely love william and wont give him up for all the money in the world!
I truly hope your last comment is the case. But sadly i'm thinking if the person who "love him so much they wouldn't give him up for the world" REALLY loved him then they would have turned him in by now. Unless they think he is better of with them for some reason? I don't want to imagine what that scenario would be so I won't speculate.maybe there is no reward offered because police already know who/what happened?
maybe the person who should come forward is involved in what happened, in planning etc
or they arent motivated by money, they are wealthy and dont want to lose social standing?
or in a happy scenario....
they truely love william and wont give him up for all the money in the world!
I truly hope your last comment is the case. But sadly i'm thinking if the person who "love him so much they wouldn't give him up for the world" REALLY loved him then they would have turned him in by now. Unless they think he is better of with them for some reason? I don't want to imagine what that scenario would be so I won't speculate.
All I can say is I feel so terribly sorry for Spedding's alleged victims when this finally goes to trial. They were little girl's back in 1987 when these alleged crimes took place. They were aged six and three. Tiny little girls who should never have been exposed to any of this ****! Yet almost 30 years later they are prepared to bear witness to what allegedly took place at the hands of Spedding in 1987. The defense will tear this two girls to shreads! Spedding will walk. Be prepared for that great big "I've been acquitted" grin on Spedding's face when it is all done and dusted.
In the interim, does any this bring us any closer to what happened to William? Not one iota!
A few things that have stuck with me...
From the press conference April 2015 -
We are pursuing many, many lines of inquiry and the pedophile ring angle is just one
Regarding the request for everyone that was in the vicinity on the day to come forward...
We have pursued that line of inquiry and we have a pretty good picture of what happened on that day
https://au.news.yahoo.com/video/watch/27166072/police-conference-on-william-tyrrell/#page1
June 2015
Detective Superintendent Gary Jubelin from the state crime command homicide squad said a reconstruction of the day's events around the Kendall property had revealed there were people in the vicinity that day who were yet to come forward.
http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/william-t...-cake-and-renewed-appeal-20150626-ghyazw.html
There were approx. 200 people in the 1km radius according to police, there may have been others besides the car owners that did not come forward IMO
Hi Wexford, sorry, I'm not sure I am understanding your question, however personally I believe they feel no need to offer a reward, because they are pretty sure They Know the situation and the perpetrators. It's just a matter of assembling the missing pieces and nailing the confession, so they have a 'no doubt' scenario to present to the courts. eg. Brett Cowan ...I have thought long and hard on this and the only reason I can think of is.......money is not what is required to get the answers. Why else? Im asking if anyone does have ideas why else, not being facetious here.
IMO police dont offer a reward because they get a truck load of parasites making things up to suit the case.
I guess, the question is for those in the business of law. How reliable is a witness in a court of law that has come forward in light the reward of money?
Sadly, I think more and more in this world, love is a dying light. People are caught in the whirlwind of life and making money. Many people couldn't care less, more so criminals and the scope of people around them. Probably a spin off of the socio-path commonly known as the corporation that follows the fence line of law rather than compassion. People draw their morals from those laws. It waterfalls into the community. No one gives a rats.
The world has become a survival of the fittest at the bottom. And the top are driving it. People are kick screaming and scratching to make ends meet. Maybe money will be the solution?
If paedophile networks are killers, how safe are family witnesses?
Maybe someone is fearful, because they know how dangerous this loose large network is?
Hi Wexford, sorry, I'm not sure I am understanding your question, however personally I believe they feel no need to offer a reward, because they are pretty sure They Know the situation and the perpetrators. It's just a matter of assembling the missing pieces and nailing the confession, so they have a 'no doubt' scenario to present to the courts. eg. Brett Cowan ...
Great to see this thread come alive again. Keep it up guys and girls. ������
Thanks soso!
YesGreat to see this thread come alive again. Keep it up guys and girls. ������
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.