sosocurious
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 5, 2012
- Messages
- 6,373
- Reaction score
- 16,312
His phone pings - and the strength of the pings - should certainly have been able to verify if he was sitting in Laurieton in a cafe, school, and his office, that morning. I would think the pings would be quite localised during that time period, if that was the case.
This map of the local phone towers also highlights why William's father needed to go elsewhere for wifi/mobile reception for his work meeting/calls, at that time. (NBN would only have fairly recently been rolled out in Kendall, I think.)
![]()
https://oztowers.com/Home/Query
A team of 30 specialist detectives and analysts has been searching for clues, doorknocking and scouring phone records. Theyve been interviewing known sex offenders in the area, in nearby towns and in caravan parks. Theyve hit a brick wall, too, Fehon says
http://www.portnews.com.au/story/256...illiam-tyrell/
You would think so SA.
Scouring those phone records.
I guess that started with who had rung nana or who she had rung.
All the confusion about the 8th and 9th of September. On the surface seems rather insignificant. Col just mixed it up.
I wonder where BS, AJ, PB and DN - in fact any poi we have yet to hear about phones pinged on those days?