CB?
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
No S, only first name mentioned, more than likely SS.
CB?
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Don't know if there was an article attached at some time.
Screen shot from a timeline video.
A tip-off to police claims a white van is seen driving into bushland.
![]()
http://www.theage.com.au/video/video-news/video-nsw-news/where-is-william-tyrrell-20150905-4291c
I didnt mean fitted up by police or completely. Maybe just a few strategically placed items or words in ears to distract from someones own culpability, whether they were his partner in crime or not.
I dont know that such an awful lot of earthmoving and police manpower would be expended for someone whos merely a messenger.
And where are we left? As usual, without answers for William and his parents. I pray Jubes has them and he has the crucial piece of evidence he needs to make an arrest or arrests (and make them stick in a court of law).
That car part has always been a mystery. It sure as heck isn't on the off-chance that they are/were looking for a car part. Someone's vehicle was missing a car part, or had a car part replaced recently (at the time) because they had lost the part.
Yes, it could have been a before/after thing. CCTV showing a vehicle with a car part, CCTV later on showing the vehicle without the car part.
Or it could have been a noisy muffler heard in the forest. And someone had been into a garage and had their muffler/tailpipe/whatever fixed.
Are you suggesting the spiderman toy was planted? In that case wouldn't Spedding's side have just denied knowing anything about it, rather than saying it was a gift from one of the kids?
In BS's case I think there may be a few people in his past who would like to fit him up. Not the police.
Maybe the earthworks and investigations done have now led them to believe he is only a part of the whole story of where William is?
Otherwise he really is the unluckiest washing machine repairman in the world. Happens to have been at the house and expected to return at some stage where a child disappears, happens to have a history with children, happens that someone finds out he was at the house and tells of his history, happens to have been at a coffee shop and a school function that day and no one remembers him, happens to have a spiderman doll in his car? Not to mention he happens to have a history with the likes of Tony Jones.
In BS's case I think there may be a few people in his past who would like to fit him up. Not the police.
Maybe the earthworks and investigations done have now led them to believe he is only a part of the whole story of where William is?
Otherwise he really is the unluckiest washing machine repairman in the world. Happens to have been at the house and expected to return at some stage where a child disappears, happens to have a history with children, happens that someone finds out he was at the house and tells of his history, happens to have been at a coffee shop and a school function that day and no one remembers him, happens to have a spiderman doll in his car? Not to mention he happens to have a history with the likes of Tony Jones.
Happens to have just deleted his call log (tradies don't do that very often, they rely on the saved numbers too much, especially due to current and recent job contacts)
Happens to have posted strange things about William (someone today is ...... )
Happens to have a mattress in his pawn shop
Happens to have driven by a remote police search where a white van had been seen driving into the forest
All these things in isolation may not be so suspicious. But put them together cummulatively and it is easy to see why he is named as a POI.
I agree with the reasons BS was initially listed as a high-priority POI and named, SA — especially the ‘rubberiness’ surrounding the timing of events of the day William disappeared. Not to mention the degrees of separation from AJ, KL and NC.
I also support the historical charges being heard.
There’s just something that diesn’t seal the deal for me about him being William’s initial abductor. Accessory before or after the fact; probably.
I find it extremely difficult to make a concrete decision about the person or persons responsible for William’s disappearance until the evidence is tested in a court of law.
Pretty telling having to go to a psychic to confirm your husbands innocence.
Why would you do that IF you knew he was with you at the time of Williams abduction.
I think she gave him an alibi and he has fed her some dubious story of where he was, and she is unconvinced but loyal.
That's okay, bohemian. I am not trying to convince anyone. Just don't want him disappearing from the conversation because he is certainly my main suspect, as well as other WS members primary suspect.
I would hate for him to read here, which he very likely does, as does his fan club, and think the heat is off this dispicable man. I have the greatest empathy for his child victims, not him.
Pretty telling having to go to a psychic to confirm your husbands innocence.
Why would you do that IF you knew he was with you at the time of Williams abduction.
I think she gave him an alibi and he has fed her some dubious story of where he was, and she is unconvinced but loyal.
I find it particularly dubious to remain loyal to him and not tell what you know when he is now up on multiple child sex charges, both with the two girls, and with multiple victims in another state.
And to have your grandchildren removed from your house, due to his presence. I know who I would have live elsewhere, and it wouldn't be the grandchildren.
I find it particularly dubious to remain loyal to him and not tell what you know when he is now up on multiple child sex charges, both with the two girls, and with multiple victims in another state.
And to have your grandchildren removed from your house, due to his presence. I know who I would have live elsewhere, and it wouldn't be the grandchildren.
I still believe he is #1 POI, thinking back to the pressure put on him in the beginning. I don't believe the police would have cleared out his septic tank etc, if there had been anyone whatsoever(apart from MS) who recalled seeing him at school assembly. The moment you lie to police about where you were, you'd better have a good reason.
I don't believe he was there, if not one person saw him sitting behind, in front, next to them, coming in or going out. Wouldn't surprise me if the police made a seating map of the whole assembly and know exactly where every person was sitting.
lol and don't get me started on his creepy video.
I must have missed LE stating that not one person saw BS at his grandchildren's school assembly, could you please lead me to that? tia!
I must have missed LE stating that not one person saw BS at his grandchildren's school assembly, could you please lead me to that? tia!
I have not seen it stated, that not one person saw BS either. Clearly MS is saying she saw him though.
But the people he himself named ... did not remember seeing him evidently.
Wonder what the outcomes of the photo's was?
“What he said did not add up because people he named did not remember seeing him,” a source alleged..............
It is understood Mr Spedding has asked a woman who was taking photographs at the assembly for a copy of the *pictures.
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/ne...l/news-story/a92dc8eaef8d7a48f25e7673fd7f2cf1
imo
If I was BS I'd be going around every media outlet in Australia showing the " photos" and if I was unlucky enough not to be in photos, I'd be begging the people I spoke to or sat near to speak up for me.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.