Australia Australia - William Tyrrell, 3, Kendall, NSW, 12 Sept 2014 - #28

[drsleuth]

Literally spitting in the face of the hard working NSW police force who are tirelessy investigating the " disappearance" of her son.........wow what a way to thank them :shame::tantrum:

 

[Hbayne]

Literally spitting in the face of the hard working NSW police force who are tirelessy investigation the " disappearance" of her son.........wow what a way to thank them :shame::tantrum:

Yes it's probably the most insulting thing one can do. A deep seated hatred for authority perhaps

 

[drsleuth]

Yes it's probably the most insulting thing one can do. A deep seated hatred for authority perhaps

Sure is ( plus all the exposure screening the poor cop would have to go through :-( )

 

[Hbayne]

Sure is ( plus all the exposure screening the poor cop would have to go through :-( )

And in front of impressionable children !

 

[drsleuth]

Sadly, the children have probably seen it all before & much worse, hence being removed from their care..........

The poor children :gaah:

 

[SouthAussie]

I was looking at similar examples last night to see what her sentence might be. Looks like it could be a fine of around $500. Less milk and eggs for the children, perhaps. Or maybe the electricity company will have to wait a while for payment.

 

[Hbayne]

I was looking at similar examples last night to see what her sentence might be. Looks like it could be a fine of around $500. Less milk and eggs for the children, perhaps. Or maybe the electricity company will have to wait a while for payment.

Or maybe a paid interview ? I'm surprised she hasn't already, I'm sure big bucks would be on offer. Can only assume she is still gagged .

 

[kiwi50]

It would break the foster parents heart the thought of sending ‘Sarah’ back to that environment.

 

[sosocurious]

I am hoping in NC next media exclusive she will tell us were she was on the day William disappeared.

I am just not believing that the police have not spoken to her.

 

[SouthAussie]

I am hoping in NC next media exclusive she will tell us were she was on the day William disappeared.

I am just not believing that the police have not spoken to her.

Of course they have spoken to her.

Maybe she is just not getting the continuous attention she wants because she knows nothing useful to the investigation, so she is getting her attention from the media instead.

 

[SouthAussie]

Or maybe a paid interview ? I'm surprised she hasn't already, I'm sure big bucks would be on offer. Can only assume she is still gagged .

I am sure that she will always be gagged about the foster situation, while it is ongoing.

Maybe she could do an interview, though, and tell us all why she spat on a police officer. Especially, as sleuth says, when they are working hard to find her biological son.

 

[sosocurious]

Of course they have spoken to her.

Maybe she is just not getting the continuous attention she wants because she knows nothing useful to the investigation, so she is getting her attention from the media instead.

Maybe there were some inconsistencies ...........

 

[sosocurious]

She has her theories, but for legal reasons they can’t be printed.

“Whatever they’ve done, they’ve done very well,” she says, again choking up.

https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/n...e/news-story/75a29dde86e5a26dd6d5e4dd963ac62d
William Tyrrell: Missing toddler’s grandmother has lost all hope of finding him alive
EXCLUSIVE Taylor Auerbach,

“The person who (took William), is sitting back thinking he got away with it,” she said.
“He’s reading about Brendan getting into trouble and thinking, ‘good, that’s not me’.”

http://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/pa...d/news-story/1a73063218a15527c703ad7d2136710e

They've done.... He thinks he has got away with it.

Has NC theory changed?

Geez it could well be a she.
imo

 

[kiwi50]

I wish a reporter would ask NC if she ever offered to take in her grandchildren when they needed a safe haven, or was she never considered suitable

 

[sosocurious]

I wish a reporter would ask NC if she ever offered to take in her grandchildren when they needed a safe haven, or was she never considered suitable

I just keep wondering where and with who Williams sister was in the care of before joining him a week after his arrival at his foster family.
Could she have been with a relative? For reasons that can not be disclosed she had to be removed from that arrangement as well?

I find it odd that NC never refers to Williams sister. The foster parents have.
They have explained why it is important to protect her from the nuances of her situation.
imo

 

[Hbayne]

I just keep wondering where and with who Williams sister was in the care of before joining him a week after his arrival at his foster family.
Could she have been with a relative? For reasons that can not be disclosed she had to be removed from that arrangement as well?

I find it odd that NC never refers to Williams sister. The foster parents have.
They have explained why it is important to protect her from the nuances of her situation.
imo

I don't think her motivation is for the love of William or her son. Little girl is irrelevant as can't make any money from talking about her. IMO

 

[Bohemian]

OT: Just want to say what an absolute joy it is to spend the day with my granddaughter. I can feel proud that choices I made, in the face of more than a few disadvantages, have lead me here today. It is never too late to transcend the past. . . all it takes is guts and more than a little humility.

 

[sosocurious]

OT: Just want to say what an absolute joy it is to spend the day with my granddaughter. I can feel proud that decisions I made, in the face of more than a few disadvantages, have lead me here today. It is never too late . . . all it takes is guts and more than a little humility.

Never too late....:grouphug:

 

[sosocurious]

Things have changed and I want my kids back: what can I do?

The Children's Court will not consider changing an order unless there has been a 'significant change in circumstances'. The Court will look back at the problems that led to the original orders being made and will decide whether things have changed enough to justify changing or cancelling the orders.............................................


What kind of evidence do I need?
The Magistrate will consider what has happened since the orders were made, and what changes you have made.

You will need to set out in your affidavit the reasons why the Magistrate should make the orders you are seeking, including:

* what you have done differently since your children were removed from your care,
* how your children have been doing since they were removed,
* what contact you have had with your children, and
* what your plans are for the children if the Court makes the orders you are seeking.

Your case might be helped by evidence from people or organisations you have been working with to address your previous child protection issues, such as:

* letters from doctors, counsellors or social workers about how well you are doing, including how often you have been attending these services,
* certificates from parenting classes you have attended, and
* certificates for any drug or alcohol treatment programs you have completed.

https://www.legalaid.nsw.gov.au/pub...care/5.-what-happens-when-my-kids-are-in-care
https://www.legalaid.nsw.gov.au/pub...changed-and-i-want-my-kids-back-what-can-i-do

 

[sosocurious]

Natalie said that after William was finally removed from Brendan and Karlie’s care, the pair had infrequent visiting rights and could only see him at a public shopping centre near Ryde.

Well even NC is acknowledging it was neither a quick or straight forward process.

“Karlie and Brendan could see William for one hour every seven or eight weeks at the Macquarie Centre,” she said.

Hmm ..you would think court orders a little more precise. eg. every fourth Monday.

http://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/pa...d/news-story/1a73063218a15527c703ad7d2136710e

What about contact?

Except in very rare cases, most children in care have contact with their family. Arrangements for you to have contact with your child should be set out in the Care Plan (see Booklet 2: Going to the Children's Court).

If the Children's Court has made an order about who can have contact with your children, then the order must be followed. The order will say how often contact should happen, and whether it needs to be supervised.

Sometimes instead of orders, the Court makes 'notations'. These are not enforceable but provide a guide for how contact should happen, whilst still allowing flexibility in case things change.

Remember that contact orders and Care Plans usually set a 'minimum' amount of contact. What this means is that it may be possible for you to have more contact after the final orders are made, but only if the person with parental responsibility for your children agrees.

If things are going really well and your children are benefitting from the contact, it is always possible to agree to increase the amount of contact you have with your children

https://www.legalaid.nsw.gov.au/pub...care/5.-what-happens-when-my-kids-are-in-care