Australia Australia - William Tyrrell, 3, Kendall, NSW, 12 Sept 2014 - #31

[frogwell]

Wasn't there an recent post where her husband said she left @ 9:38am and we were all surprised he had the exact time?

No, there was a quote from a resident in the street who said his wife left at 10.38 but didn't see anything. Comment not attributed to any particular name.

 

[Whàngarei]

In one link it said richard ...then it disappeared..

 

[SouthAussie]

Sure, when you are looking for an alternative narrative, then that might be one of them. I am not looking for an alternative, I am looking at the facts we have been presented with and analysing them. MOO

We have been presented with William arriving in Kendall on Thursday night, stopping at Maccas along the way, William/little children being heard playing outside on Friday morning, then silence at around 10:30am when William was discovered missing ... that silence stated by the foster mum and the mum across the street.

 

[frogwell]

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/ne...d/news-story/2d8aa4bde6c83ded451c26090fb55643




“We were one of the few — I’ll say unfortunate people now — that were here when it happened,” she says. “We were just witnesses but the police are on our case a lot now and it’s frustrating.

“My two littlest (grandchildren) are here all the time. I cannot leave them. They used to run up and down here on the bikes. They could run up and down on the road. It was idyllic. But now there’s that stigma. You can’t leave your kids to do that.

“If my kids want to ride their bike, I’m right beside them. I can’t take my eyes off them.

“It’s changed. It’s like you can’t trust the place any more. People are scared. But I cannot, personally, believe that pedophiles roam this place looking for …” She doesn’t finish the sentence. “I’ve lived here for 11 years and I’ve not seen anything like that. It’s just not feasible. But we also know William could not have gone walking into the bush around here. It’s too thick. It’s just not easy to do that.”

Have always found this reidents comments interesting.

 

[SouthAussie]

In one link it said richard ...then it disappeared..

What link? About what? Please don't speak in riddles.

 

[frogwell]

In one link it said richard ...then it disappeared..

You got that link, cause that would contradict what JW said about her and her husband not being there.

 

[SouthAussie]

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/ne...d/news-story/2d8aa4bde6c83ded451c26090fb55643




“We were one of the few — I’ll say unfortunate people now — that were here when it happened,” she says. “We were just witnesses but the police are on our case a lot now and it’s frustrating.

“My two littlest (grandchildren) are here all the time. I cannot leave them. They used to run up and down here on the bikes. They could run up and down on the road. It was idyllic. But now there’s that stigma. You can’t leave your kids to do that.

“If my kids want to ride their bike, I’m right beside them. I can’t take my eyes off them.

“It’s changed. It’s like you can’t trust the place any more. People are scared. But I cannot, personally, believe that pedophiles roam this place looking for …” She doesn’t finish the sentence. “I’ve lived here for 11 years and I’ve not seen anything like that. It’s just not feasible. But we also know William could not have gone walking into the bush around here. It’s too thick. It’s just not easy to do that.”

Have always found this reidents comments interesting.

Do you know that street number of where this grandmother lives? Is it way down the hill?

 

[frogwell]

Do you know that street number of where this grandmother lives? Is it way down the hill?

I wish I knew where to place her, but she was home with her husband that day. There are a few other people that you can confirm were on that street when he went missing that day through radio and other interviews that shows there were at least 12 people. There may be more. In one interview you could assume that Lydene Heslop only had 1 child at home that day from her comments, but in another interview she states that 2 or more children were home that day. Just an example. MOO

 

[SouthAussie]

I wish I knew where to place her, but she was home with her husband that day. There are a few other people that you can confirm were on that street when he went missing that day through radio and other interviews that shows there were at least 12 people. There may be more. In one interview you could assume that Lydene Heslop only had 1 child at home that day from her comments, but in another interview she states that 2 or more children were home that day. Just an example. MOO

Yes, I am aware of people who had children at home. That is why I questioned about 'down the street'. When Makara was around we looked at that, and that is where we placed them. Not in range of Mrs Wilson.

 

[Credulious]

I'm going to say, I think police know what happened, but someone was that well premeditated for an event that they executed their plan the minute the opportunity arose.

Everything went as planned.

 

[frogwell]

Yes, I am aware of people who had children at home. That is why I questioned about 'down the street'. When Makara was around we looked at that, and that is where we placed them. Not in range of Mrs Wilson.

Actually, that is a good point, and they were allowed to travel unsupervised on their bikes up and down the street, but that was not my point. There could have been younger kids on bikes that rode up past WT and he followed them, but then there is no scent of him past the boundary, unless someone, the other children knew in this scenario drove up the street to find the children and saw WT or took him.

 

[JLZ]

The grandmother of 10 quoted lived "towards the bottom of the street", according to The Australian. But, playing children aren't stationary. Same with LH's children--Mrs Wilson probably wouldn't have heard them in LH's backyard, which is where they were when foster mother came knocking, but they might have been within hearing range earlier that morning.

 

[bearbear]

In one link it said richard ...then it disappeared..

i saw that too, it was ages ago, at the beginning, but cant find it anymore, i found the preciseness of the time interestig

 

[sleepinoz]

i saw that too, it was ages ago, at the beginning, but cant find it anymore, i found the preciseness of the time interestig

The Wilsons are listed as RB & J Wilson

 

[k-mac]

i find it incomprehensible until Williams found how anybody is off the table in the police eyes.
but I understand that websleuths wont discuss them and the reasons why.
especially if there is nothing to hide I cant see why its not ok to be able to discredit falsehoods about them etc. because if that's the case that's what we shall find.
anyway I just wanted to add I can see the suspicious thoughts about the time stamps and the validation of the picture on the verandah but in all honesty if there was aconspiracy this length is totally unnecessary.

if my child was missing and he was wearing a spiderman suit the same as "a picture from his birthday" six months ago , I would give it to police and I would state that it was from a previous time. there is simply no reason to make a photo on that day suddenly appear that is misleading.
its not that big of a deal to the police when the picture was taken imho.

so don't think they would NEED to doctor it. (for a cover up which is I guess the posters point)

 

[bearbear]

so just side view cctv vision of vehicles?......

Investigators will today set up at the Kendall Tennis Club with still images taken of all cars captured on the club’s CCTV camera on the morning William went missing in the hope of identifying any suspicious vehicles.

Port Macquarie Superintendent Paul Fehon, who is leading the investigation into the three-year-old’s disappearance nine weeks ago, said police were asking everyone who drove past the Graham St club before 11am on September 12 to come forward and identify their vehicle.

“We’re trying to match them up to see if we can eliminate the local cars and then see if we’ve got cars that are unusual,” Supt Fehon said.

“Unfortunately, it’s not a head on or behind shot where we would have number plates, it’s only descriptions of cars.

“We’ll look at the side profile of a car and if we can’t find identify some then we may have a new line of inquiry.”

http://williamtyrrelldisappearance.blogspot.com.au/2015/

 

[sosocurious]

4:47 of interview.
Judy wilson - I wasn't home, my husband wasn't home we'd left....................

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nVMrYG_NSVI&feature=youtu.be

 

[bearbear]

i find it incomprehensible until Williams found how anybody is off the table in the police eyes.
but I understand that websleuths wont discuss them and the reasons why.
especially if there is nothing to hide I cant see why its not ok to be able to discredit falsehoods about them etc. because if that's the case that's what we shall find.
anyway I just wanted to add I can see the suspicious thoughts about the time stamps and the validation of the picture on the verandah but in all honesty if there was aconspiracy this length is totally unnecessary.

if my child was missing and he was wearing a spiderman suit the same as "a picture from his birthday" six months ago , I would give it to police and I would state that it was from a previous time. there is simply no reason to make a photo on that day suddenly appear that is misleading.
its not that big of a deal to the police when the picture was taken imho.

so don't think they would NEED to doctor it. (for a cover up which is I guess the posters point)

the photo is important because it shows proof to police he was there at that time and day he went missing,

 

[sosocurious]

i find it incomprehensible until Williams found how anybody is off the table in the police eyes.
but I understand that websleuths wont discuss them and the reasons why.
especially if there is nothing to hide I cant see why its not ok to be able to discredit falsehoods about them etc. because if that's the case that's what we shall find.
anyway I just wanted to add I can see the suspicious thoughts about the time stamps and the validation of the picture on the verandah but in all honesty if there was aconspiracy this length is totally unnecessary.

if my child was missing and he was wearing a spiderman suit the same as "a picture from his birthday" six months ago , I would give it to police and I would state that it was from a previous time. there is simply no reason to make a photo on that day suddenly appear that is misleading.
its not that big of a deal to the police when the picture was taken imho.

so don't think they would NEED to doctor it. (for a cover up which is I guess the posters point)

I agree.

I don't do facebook so have no idea of glitches and dates changes.

I was wondering if it could have been as simple as getting ready for -

10:00am – 26 June 2015 – PLEASE DON’T GIVE UP ON OUR BOY! Where’s William? Campaign Launch

http://www.whereswilliam.org/newsroom/

It just seems to me there is a very simple explanation.

 

[Whàngarei]

You got that link, cause that would contradict what JW said about her and her husband not being there.

I saw it in two articles on the one shared page.i read it went back to find it and the whole post had disappeared.....probably near the time we were talking about it with in the last month