Bohemian
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 6, 2015
- Messages
- 10,370
- Reaction score
- 16,631
There was an article that described Spedding as a convicted pedophile. I think that was Daily Mail but I also think it was more than twelve months ago. But how long does it take for a court case to take place after the action is started? It's possible that Spedding launched the action in time but the hearing couldn't happen immediately because of court backlogs or whatever. But whether he'd get Legal Aid for that--I don't know. I can't see him funding a defamation case himself. On the other hand, if he's seeking an injunction to stop publication/broadcasting (still under defamation law I believe)--if the Victorian case is pending he would have a good argument to forestall future material that might prejudice the jury, but wouldn't sub judice cover that anyway?
This one, published on 3-4 September 2016:
Because of the size of the investigation, police have asked detectives from departments surrounding William's hometown and the last place he was seen Kendall, in northern NSW to help interview and help narrow down the list, according to The Weekend Australian.
Since William vanished, police have publicly named five persons of interest they have interviewed including convicted paedophiles William Spedding and Tony Jones, as well as the best friend of William's grandmother, Kim Loweke.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ell-identified-hundreds-persons-interest.html
Eight months over the 12 month statute of limitations and a bit of a long time for it not to be heard in the NSW Supreme Court, unless the action was held over while the NSW matter was being heard. Is that even possible?
I thought suppression wrt the outcome of the NSW matter not prejudicing the Victorian proceedings would have been dealt with by the magistrate at the conclusion of the trial. The sub judice rule would only apply in Victoria wrt to reporting on the outcome of the NSW trial, wouldnt it?