were my exact thoughts too. Although yes he has been charged he hasn’t as far as we know been convicted and one of the articles someone here found had one of the publications saying he was a convicted paedophile. If only they’d used the word alleged !!!What has been published against him which is defamation? Has he not been charged with sexual assault of very young children?
Has he not been named publicly by the police as a person of interest?
Maybe he should be suing the police force if he is so sure that he is innocent of these things, not the press who reports charges before the court or police investigations.
Same date and time as the one soso posted on last page against dailymail. Are they all one and the same ?29 Jun 9:30 am 2018/00164266 William Spedding v NEWS LIFE MEDIA PTY LIMITED Civil Supreme Court Directions (Defamation List)
Supreme Court Sydney
Justice L McCallum
' + lt.court_room_name | trustedHTML" class="ng-binding ng-scope" style="box-sizing: inherit;">Law Courts Building
Court 11D Queens Square Sydney -
29 Jun 9:30 am 2018/00091447 William Spedding v Dailymail.com Australia Pty Ltd Civil Supreme Court Directions (Defamation List)
Supreme Court Sydney
Justice L McCallum
' + lt.court_room_name | trustedHTML" class="ng-binding ng-scope" style="box-sizing: inherit;">Law Courts Building
Court 11D Queens Square Sydney -
29 Jun 9:30 am 2018/00091441 William Spedding v Nationwide News Pty Ltd Civil Supreme Court Directions (Defamation List)
Supreme Court Sydney
Justice L McCallum
' + lt.court_room_name | trustedHTML" class="ng-binding ng-scope" style="box-sizing: inherit;">Law Courts Building
Court 11D Queens Square Sydney
Same date and time as the one soso posted on last page against dailymail. Are they all one and the same ?
So confusingDifferent case numbers.
Maybe the same article or article revisited, though.
imo
So confusing
Different case numbers.
Maybe the same article or article revisited, though.
imo
What has been published against him which is defamation? Has he not been charged with sexual assault of very young children?
Has he not been named publicly by the police as a person of interest?
I think some of the pursuit of damages from media might be to have them admit specific police source tip offs as a way to legitimise some of the things they have written. It may be a way to have the police as a source on record and then he can go after them for different things...IMO. Both Colin Youngberry and MS have alluded to the timing when they or BS are free to speak, from memory it will be a "bombshell" and "fireworks"
....... not the press who reports charges before the court or police investigations.
Yes SA and he has not been cleared as a poi as far as we know in Williams case .And that is from taskforce Roseanne , not media. Until he is cleared I have no sympathy, same with the charges of sex crimes against not one but it seems a few . I will be the first to apologise on here on all accounts if BS has nothing to do with any of these crimes. In some way I almost hope he isn’t and if I didn’t have in the back of my mind the serious things he has been accused of I would feel incredibly sorry for him.That may be his hope, who knows. But from the caselaw it seems that it is the combination of police searching for a deceased child, pics of the van with the 'S' removed, and the 'invitation' for others to wonder why the 'S' isn't there ... these are the things, in combination, that he thinks makes people wonder about him.
Though I think it is the removal of the grandchildren and the historical child sex charges that make people wonder about him.
and to add to that- deleted phone log, sketchy alibi, toy in his car .... the list goes on, ex brother in law to one of Australia’s worst paedophiles, whom he lived with at some pointYes SA and he has not been cleared as a poi as far as we know in Williams case .And that is from taskforce Roseanne , not media. Until he is cleared I have no sympathy, same with the charges of sex crimes against not one but it seems a few . I will be the first to apologise on here on all accounts if BS has nothing to do with any of these crimes. In some way I almost hope he isn’t and if I didn’t have in the back of my mind the serious things he has been accused of I would feel incredibly sorry for him.
I just can’t see it panning out as him being not involved in some way or other
I think some of the pursuit of damages from media might be to have them admit specific police source tip offs as a way to legitimise some of the things they have written. It may be a way to have the police as a source on record and then he can go after them for different things...IMO. Both Colin Youngberry and MS have alluded to the timing when they or BS are free to speak, from memory it will be a "bombshell" and "fireworks"
But the owner of the caravan park should have known who was staying there. but there has been no more information on that.One of the major things that sticks out to me is the child heard distressed and crying from the caravan park . Owner or manager said there were no children staying there at the time . Will try to find Link but it’s always been to me a very questionable point
Caravan park searched in the hunt for missing toddler William Tyrell
Yes, but were the articles in question prior to charges being laid for historical crimes? If so then it was all about how things were percived in relation to WT's disappearance.That may be his hope, who knows. But from the caselaw it seems that it is the combination of police searching for a deceased child, pics of the van with the 'S' removed, and the 'invitation' for others to wonder why the 'S' isn't there ... these are the things, in combination, that he thinks makes people wonder about him.
Though I think it is the removal of the grandchildren and the historical child sex charges that make people wonder about him.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.