Thanks Bo,
That's the one. I'm reading this with a different mindset today.
Perhaps the person hanging out in that campsite didn't do so with the intent of abducting anyone. Maybe they're a drifter. Maybe they were smoking drugs or getting drunk away from the nagging wife or family. Maybe they were just laying low when they spotted little William and acted on impulse. Totally unplanned. But Two Worlds Collided.
It would explain why nothing was seen by neighbours coming and going that morning as they were never on the 'street'.
Placing a hand over Williams mouth, he could have been taken back into that bushland in under a minute and by using the rough track we've discussed way back had an alternative escape route (link below). If this was the scenario there would have been evidence of recent use of the bush camp during the initial search. Jake Cassar confirms there had been supplies stashed their recently. If that search was concentrated on locating a little boy lost and not finding a perpetrator of an abduction, this evidence of recent inhabitants may have been overlooked be LE.
We haven't really explored this scenario before that I'm aware of. What are your thoughts?
Is this the escape route taken by missing William Tyrrell’s abductors