Australia Australia - William Tyrrell, 3, Kendall, Nsw, 12 Sept 2014 - #37

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #1,161
Yes that aswell, why the mattress , was it there fo preparation but things went wrong
It was a pawn shop business wasn't it? So very likely there were other items there of a similar nature.
 
  • #1,162
Really, I’ve not heard that before, do you have a link ? don’t know how you can seat the mattress means nothing. It certainly didnto the police .

It is a rented premises and if police didn't take the mattress away for testing that decision may have been regretful and negligent. Just because they take something for testing doesn't mean involvement.

You don't need a link to know it was a rented premises.
 
  • #1,163
It was a pawn shop business wasn't it? So very likely there were other items there of a similar nature.

I don't think mattresses are permitted to be 'pawned'.
 
  • #1,164
It is a rented premises and if police didn't take the mattress away for testing that decision may have been regretful and negligent. Just because they take something for testing doesn't mean involvement.

You don't need a link to know it was a rented premises.
So how on earth can you say with any authority that the mattress means nothing.
 
  • #1,165
RSBBM

I recall reading those same angry FB posts, too, but I thought it was to do with a lengthy overseas holiday, not moving overseas. My memory is not that sharp on that detail, sorry.

I am sure it was to do with a move overseas. I will see if I can dig up the reference time permitting.
 
  • #1,166
Yes involved but maybe not solely or directly. But then again , so many things point to him.

only coincidence point to someone you are referring to. and the possibility of a vexatious intent by a former partner of that person who has raised allegations re 1987. Really makes me consider BS may have been set up well and truly.
 
  • #1,167
That's always been my thinking, too. He is involved but not wholly. I do not believe that he has been set up as a fall guy/scapegoat by the police, though.

Not by the police by someone with a pure evil intent.
 
  • #1,168
Thanks very much, CuriousCritter and iailwa...much appreciated! I do remember seeing that interview some time ago but didn't hurt to see it again.

I don't really know what to make of her (KL). Laughing and carrying on like that at the most inappropriate time makes her come across as a bit of a fruit loop, well to me at least. Would definitely not surprise me if we learn at some stage in the future she knew a whole lot more than what she's let on. We'll see!

The laughing could just be nerves because she is being interviewed on television. Just giving her the benefit of the doubt (because I do the same thing when I'm nervous). I don't think her laughing, in my opinion, was from nerves, though. To me it came across as cockiness and a sense of being better than what she is. IMO of course. I wonder if we will hear her name pop up a bit more as this case goes on, even if it's for her to get a few more minutes of 'fame'.
 
  • #1,169
only coincidence point to someone you are referring to. and the possibility of a vexatious intent by a former partner of that person who has raised allegations re 1987. Really makes me consider BS may have been set up well and truly.
Not so sure he was set up by anybody, more likely a disgruntled person took advantage of the situation, however, he is a POI because he was at the house just days prior to Sep 12th., not for any other reason I can fathom.
 
  • #1,170
Allanah has acted morally and in support of William imo. The initial story that was put out about William was totally against what the 'truth' was and all Allanah did was face upto the giant of FACS and their ineptitude make rules and regulations without backup by Law. Allanah should be congratulated not vilified.

If she had not stood up we would still be following the premise that William had attended Kendall with his bio family to visit bio family.

I don't necessarily agree, but I understand what you are saying. I agree that the department needs a good shakeup but the need for L's privacy needs to be considered, too.
 
  • #1,171
I am sure it was to do with a move overseas. I will see if I can dig up the reference time permitting.

Thanks, but I saw it on a public FB page belonging to a person involved in this case, so I don't think it can be referenced, unless that person made comments about it in a media interview?
 
  • #1,172
  • #1,173
I think it's quite presumptuous of AS to do what she did, given that William has 2 families who could have done that, had they wanted it to be public knowledge, I think the repercussions have not been felt in their entirety, as yet. Those 3 children had no need to be embroiled in this and it doesn't appear to have helped their parents, at all. I think the plan was to expose the identity of the foster parents.
 
  • #1,174
I think it's quite presumptuous of AS to do what she did, given that William has 2 families who could have done that, had they wanted it to be public knowledge, I think the repercussions have not been felt in their entirety, as yet. Those 3 children had no need to be embroiled in this and it doesn't appear to have helped their parents, at all. I think the plan was to expose the identity of the foster parents.
Deleted sorry, did not mean to reply
 
  • #1,175
Not so sure he was set up by anybody, more likely a disgruntled person took advantage of the situation, however, he is a POI because he was at the house just days prior to Sep 12th., not for any other reason I can fathom.
I think there are more reasons than just his being there prior to make him a poi.
 
  • #1,176
  • #1,177
It is a rented premises and if police didn't take the mattress away for testing that decision may have been regretful and negligent. Just because they take something for testing doesn't mean involvement.

You don't need a link to know it was a rented premises.
I think the rules are to link something you are stating as fact
 
  • #1,178
The laughing could just be nerves because she is being interviewed on television. Just giving her the benefit of the doubt (because I do the same thing when I'm nervous). I don't think her laughing, in my opinion, was from nerves, though. To me it came across as cockiness and a sense of being better than what she is. IMO of course. I wonder if we will hear her name pop up a bit more as this case goes on, even if it's for her to get a few more minutes of 'fame'.
Hi Freddo Frog. Yes, you're right. Some people do laugh due to nerves, that's true. For some reason, I don't think that's the case for KL either. She definitely rubbed me the wrong way in that interview that's for sure. MOO
 
  • #1,179
only coincidence point to someone you are referring to. and the possibility of a vexatious intent by a former partner of that person who has raised allegations re 1987. Really makes me consider BS may have been set up well and truly.
It would make a lot of sense, but don't you think, if that was the case, they had to abduct necessarily rather a little girl?
 
  • #1,180
Allanah has acted morally and in support of William imo. The initial story that was put out about William was totally against what the 'truth' was and all Allanah did was face upto the giant of FACS and their ineptitude make rules and regulations without backup by Law. Allanah should be congratulated not vilified.

If she had not stood up we would still be following the premise that William had attended Kendall with his bio family to visit bio family.

I just remember the female journalist, who wrote, that the public is getting completely false reports of this case "William T" ; the media knows the truth but is forbidden to tell the right story. What was the journalist's name again?

ETA: Journalist Caroline Overington
It’s the true story of William Tyrell. And as things stand, you’ll never get to hear it, writes Caroline Overington.
OPINION: Why we'll never hear the truth about William Tyrell
Memory only, no link found: "The public was lied to".
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
77
Guests online
2,412
Total visitors
2,489

Forum statistics

Threads
632,798
Messages
18,631,868
Members
243,295
Latest member
Safeplace07
Back
Top