Australia Australia - William Tyrrell, 3, Kendall, Nsw, 12 Sept 2014 - #38

[Warshawski]

[QUOTE="deugirtni, post: 14677149, member: 69662"
..... but where is it reported that nobody could state that he was there?[/QUOTE] (Partial Quote)

Hi D, I personally think the absence of a public report to uphold that fact is rendered irrelevant since BS appears to have remained a POI over all this time, even being required (by admission of his LE) to attend the Inquest from the beginning.

Who knows, maybe he's totally innocent, been playing the game as a very willing witness, and is about to blow the perpretators out of the water. ..??

And I hope that's the case. ..

It's way past time for William's loved ones to have answers as to what happened that day; answers as to how a little boy could 'disappear' into thin air, as we know that's not possible.
Given all the searches, dog squad results etc., it's my opinion that there was human involvement - SomeOne or Ones had a hand in his removal from his Grandmother's yard that day ...IMO.

I'm still open to the fact that William is being raised elsewhere. Maybe I'm just being eternally optimistic, however, IMO, there's a variety of 'personalities' in his long list of familial associations. ... and anything is possible!
Having said that, I'm sure the 'alternate father' with aboriginal heritage, & his outspoken Mother, has been given their time in the sun & questioned no end... If not, why not...

 

[Warshawski]

I think it is more about ..... where is it reported that an independent witness states that he was there?

I think it is a big assumption to think that the police waited for 4 long months to check up on him.


BBM
Mr Spedding took part in a 10-page recorded interview with detectives soon after little William went missing on the day the tradesman was due to fix the toddler’s grandmother’s washing machine.
...... detectives allegedly found some inconsistencies in what Mr Spedding told them ....

We’re for Sydney | Daily Telegraph

Sorry SA.. I replied over the top of your response - I'm always late!

 

[Warshawski]

.....and still haven't charged him or formally interviewed him as a suspect over 4 years later...... if there were a contradictory statement against BS's account, e.g being seen in Benaroon Dr. that morning or anywhere else other than where he stated, surely he would have been questioned about that under caution by now..

That's true Froggie, but I also keep on remembering how long it took them to get answers for Bruce & Denise re what happened to Daniel, and who was responsible. .. and yet they interviewed that in the very early days.

And who knows how many times BS has been questioned on things. ... Or how often anyone else has been questioned for that matter. It's my belief that the Police release information / allow 'things' to be noticed, captured, reported on etc., at their strategic will ...

 

[frogwell]

I guess if someone has been happy to lie to the police so far, why do they think this person will tell the truth to the Coroner.

If they are found to be lying, they can get up to 10 years for perjury.

 

[Warshawski]

Then why haven't they charged him? Oh that's right, more pressure after he got off 2 historical cases, cause they have no evidence.

Since I'm not a member of Det Jubelin's team, I'm not in a position to answer your question Froggie. . an interesting one for sure.

I'd go back to my previous postes, and certainly I allow for the fact that BS may be innocent. IMO, that's the case until proven otherwise in this country.
However, I don't personally feel that he's done his cause any favours with his early behaviour, the video, his 'mouth pieces', nor even with his latest 'going after the media' activities. But then who knows where his quidance is coming from.

I'm not one for false accusations, nor for seeing the innocent cop flack or any fallout from untrue rumour or inuendo, so if BS is innocent, I would hope that fact is established quickly in the inquest.

 

[Warshawski]

Asking this out of ignorance - if that’s the case, how did they escape being charged with perjury?
Also, I’ve always wondered if they (at least some of them) should have been charged with accessory after the fact.

Could be the same in this case, involving many people, perhaps different people depending on the scenario that occurred that terrible day.

Welcoming learned responses.

Sorry P & G ... would you please elaborate on who / what you're referencing to ?

Cheers..

 

[frogwell]

That's true Froggie, but I also keep on remembering how long it took them to get answers for Bruce & Denise re what happened to Daniel, and who was responsible. .. and yet they interviewed that ******* in the very early days.

And who knows how many times BS has been questioned on things. ... Or how often anyone else has been questioned for that matter. It's my belief that the Police release information / allow 'things' to be noticed, captured, reported on etc., at their strategic will ...

True, but he wasn't pursued and put under pressure for a couple of years the way BS has been.

 

[purpleandgreen]

Sorry P & G ... would you please elaborate on who / what you're referencing to ?

Cheers..

So sorry, W. I thought I’d hit the ‘Reply ‘ icon. (Insert embarrassed emoji)!

It was pondering Breaking News #775.

 

[purpleandgreen]

True, but he wasn't pursued and put under pressure for a couple of years the way BS has been.

And that itself is then interesting then, don’t you think? IMO.

 

[SouthAussie]

RSBM

I'm not one for false accusations, nor for seeing the innocent cop flack or any fallout from untrue rumour or inuendo, so if BS is innocent, I would hope that fact is established quickly in the inquest.

I hope that this first sitting of the inquest produces fairly quick results, too. Though the focus of the inquest is to determine if William is deceased and, if so, how did that happen.

Personally I believe that this first week of the inquest will be to focus on one or two high priority persons, as well as those who can help achieve answers about their activities.

I think that the Coroner recognises that answers need to come from persons who are refusing to give them ... either because they have lawyered up and will not speak with the police any more, and/or because they are hiding something that they have done, and/or because they have lied, and/or they know someone else has lied.

Craddock (counsel assisting the Coroner) has some history in dealing with violent and high risk sex offenders, and his expertise in criminal law is gauged as being very high. Let's hope that he can assist the Coroner in achieving the answers that are so needed.

Gerard Craddock SC - Barrister Profile - Litigation Analytics | Litimetrics AU

 

[Karinna]

I hope that this first sitting of the inquest produces fairly quick results, too. Though the focus of the inquest is to determine if William is deceased and, if so, how did that happen.

Personally I believe that this first week of the inquest will be to focus on one or two high priority persons, as well as those who can help achieve answers about their activities.

I think that the Coroner recognises that answers need to come from persons who are refusing to give them ... either because they have lawyered up and will not speak with the police any more, and/or because they are hiding something that they have done, and/or because they have lied, and/or they know someone else has lied.

Craddock (counsel assisting the Coroner) has some history in dealing with violent and high risk sex offenders, and his expertise in criminal law is gauged as being very high. Let's hope that he can assist the Coroner in achieving the answers that are so needed.

Gerard Craddock SC - Barrister Profile - Litigation Analytics | Litimetrics AU

BBM, How do you know WT's case involves a sexually motivated crime?

 

[frogwell]

And that itself is then interesting then, don’t you think? IMO.

not really IMO. It was obvious to investigating officers in DM's case that BC was a very likely the main suspect, something that their superiors ignored and we didn't hear about that til years after the event.

 

[SouthAussie]

BBM, How do you know WT's case involves a sexually motivated crime?

I do not believe I said that. I believe I stated some of Craddock's experience, and it sounds as if you have made an assumption from that. Somehow I don't think that Craddock's experience in Corporate or Bankruptcy Law will be remotely relevant at this inquest, some of his other experience may be.

 

[Karinna]

I do not believe I said that. I believe I stated some of Craddock's experience, and it sounds as if you have made an assumption from that. Somehow I don't think that Craddock's experience in Corporate or Bankruptcy Law will be remotely relevant at this inquest, some of his other experience may be.

The BBM portion of your post.
This
(quote)
Craddock (counsel assisting the Coroner) has some history in dealing with violent and high risk sex offenders

 

[Warshawski]

True, but he wasn't pursued and put under pressure for a couple of years the way BS has been.

Again, not being a member of that investigative team, I'm not in a position to comment either way. ( Note tho, that even if I was, I wouldn't comment due to the sanctity of strategies etc.)

IMO, there was certainly plenty of time to decide he was the One, to develop the plan to nail him & to get him to confess .. involved sitting next to him, as a civilian, on the plane trip back to Perth, etc.
None of this was known to the public.

Likewise, I'm sure there will be much to come from this inquiry. Secrets will be exposed IMO. . I'm waiting, and trying to do it patiently.

 

[SouthAussie]

Craddock (counsel assisting the Coroner) has some history in dealing with violent and high risk sex offenders, and his expertise in criminal law is gauged as being very high. Let's hope that he can assist the Coroner in achieving the answers that are so needed.

Gerard Craddock SC - Barrister Profile - Litigation Analytics | Litimetrics AU

Just adding a little to my own post, it is also interesting to note that Craddock has spent time as both a state and a commonwealth prosecutor. A very experienced lawyer.

(See his CV at this link)
Gerard Craddock SC - Maurice Byers Chambers

 

[Warshawski]

BBM, How do you know WT's case involves a sexually motivated crime?

Hi Karinna, I may have misinterpreted but I didn't take the comments from SA as to say that William's disappearance is deemed as being 'sexually motivated'.

I think it was to hi light the experience of the assisting counsel (Craddock) as those types of cases usually incur a high degree of expertise....IMO.

Perhaps you would further explain please SA ?

 

[SouthAussie]

Hi Karinna, I may have misinterpreted but I didn't take the comments from SA as to say that William's disappearance is deemed as being 'sexually motivated'.

I think it was to hi light the experience of the assisting counsel (Craddock) as those types of cases usually incur a high degree of expertise....IMO.

Perhaps you would further explain please SA ?

I explained in my post #793 above. And added to it in my post #796.

 

[Bohemian]

Can a spouse testify against the other spouse in a criminal case?

 

[bearbear]

I guess if someone has been happy to lie to the police so far, why do they think this person will tell the truth to the Coroner.

yes i agree, if you can lie easily, under oath really means nothing