Just strange that he and MS would talk to MSM willingly at the start (when they seemed to be sympathetic to them) and then smack them around legally when they published something negative. You can’t have it both ways with MSM. It was reported by Chris that B&MS asked him to interview them. That I remember quite plainly (but, then again, memories aren’t all their cracked up to be—there’s probably ‘inconsistencies’ between my memory and the factsStrange because he has been a state political reporter since May 2014?
You do realize a person can be Citizen/Resident of another country and live in a different country don't you?
Why do you need to know what country someone is from?
Where has it been proven that BS is a paedophile?
Sadly and statiscally a lot of CSA happens to most children in their own homes where they should feel safe.
I don’t know. That would come under DCI Jubelin’s heading of operational matters, I suspect, and wouldn’t be commented on. The analysis of and their outputs are inadmissible as evidence in NSW courts in any case:Have any of the main players in WT's case ever been asked to do a Polygraph?
Directly stated? Perhaps not, but there have been plenty of insinuations about that person and hopefully there will be some clarity on it at the CI.Where was that stated? And by whom? Apologies if I've missed a post.
...... and so far after 4+ years, no arrest or charges pertaining to WT's case.
The relevance is you might be okay with divulging your private information, but others are not. No one knows who is behind a computer on a large public forum, as some WS's have recently found out. But there is a separate thread for that.First question - yes of course I do! But relevance? Unless it's one of the POIs involved, then of course if found guilty they could be deported.
Second question - Because laws, courts and proceedings differ from country to country, as you know, and in Australia, from state to state. For example, things are often different here in Qld (yes that's where I am - have never tried to be secretive about it) from what they are in NSW, Victoria etc. That can lead to misunderstandings.
Anyway, back to William. I've learnt so much about Directions Hearings and Inquests etc , even just over the last few pages, so thank you to all who contributed, especially SA, Bo & Sleep. Apologies to anyone else I've omitted.
That was a case of a husband murdering his wife.Means absolutely nothing. It has taken 35 years to arrest Chris Dawson, with no body found, and two inquests recommending his arrest.
That was a case of a husband murdering his wife.
This here is about a missing foster child.
And yes if WT is found alive or deceased we have no way of knowing yet because it's still an ongoing investigation.
Look Karinna, I've answered your questions politely. And the 'relevance' was not to my whereabouts at all, but in response to your statement about someone being a citizen of one country while living in another. Please read the posts carefully so that you don't accidentally misconstrue them. I won't be engaging in any further discussions about this, as your questions have already been answered.The relevance is you might be okay with divulging your private information, but others are not. No one knows who is behind a computer on a large public forum, as some WS's have recently found out. But there is a separate thread for that.
Thank you, I didn't miss it after all, then.Directly stated? Perhaps not, but there have been plenty of insinuations about that person and hopefully there will be some clarity on it at the CI.
BS as far as i know has been the only POI that has been in the spotlight, and thoroughly forensically investigated and so far after 4+ years, no arrest or charges pertaining to WT's case.
I don't need links to it, just read back over the threads here on the WT case and it has been bantered about ad nauseum.Thank you, I didn't miss it after all, then.
BBM And do you have links to the insinuations? Again, TIA.
So it’s opinion then. Thank you for the clarification, as there’s a big difference between fact and opinions. IMOI don't need links to it, just read back over the threads here on the WT case and it has been bantered about ad nauseum.
No he hasn't had success, he has won the right for part to be heard by a jury as his application was outside the limitations of application.
ETA - Just thought I should add the link again in case it wasn't read the first time I posted it.
Spedding v Nationwide News Pty Ltd [2018] NSWSC 844 (18 May 2018)
Apologies. I thought your profile originally said North America. I must have you confused with someone else.
Just strange that he and MS would talk to MSM willingly at the start (when they seemed to be sympathetic to them) and then smack them around legally when they published something negative. You can’t have it both ways with MSM. It was reported by Chris that B&MS asked him to interview them. That I remember quite plainly (but, then again, memories aren’t all their cracked up to be—there’s probably ‘inconsistencies’ between my memory and the facts)
Just to clarify, you asked me for a link to "Insinuations".So it’s opinion then. Thank you for the clarification, as there’s a big difference between fact and opinions. IMO
I’m not sure I understand what you mean. Please elaborate.Walk a mile in their shoes.
Am I missing something. Where in the article does it state the Speddings had requested O'Keefe to record the interview.You know what I find strange? That B&MS would ask Chris O’Keefe to record an interview with them:
William Spedding claims he had nothing to do with William Tyrell disappearance | Daily Mail Online
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.