Australia Australia - William Tyrrell, 3, Kendall, Nsw, 12 Sept 2014 - #38

[sleepinoz]

Was it found the missing ‘S’ was photoshopped or truly missing?

I think this is part of his defamation case, we should find out when/if all that ends.

 

[sosocurious]

I am pretty sure they were in 2015, according to what I read about the lawsuits. (I would have to go back and find my links, but not at this moment.) One was about the 'S' missing from the Speddo's van and the photo published thereafter. And one was about the misfact of Spedding being a convicted pedo.

From memory, the van pic lawsuit cannot go ahead, but the other lawsuit can.

This could be one of them.

4 March 2015

Asked yesterday why he had not repaired his work truck after the “S” went missing from “Speddo’s”, he said simply: “Please leave.”

https://www.perthnow.com.au/news/ns...-year-old-ng-6a42aa0744d5c9857b3238c8a1bbf69b

 

[Thebottomline]

I am wondering if the 'friend' is Colin's wife ... Margaret's cousin.

Prehaps it was MS and CY and wife that attended.maybe CY did have a copy of receipt for HIS purchases that morning from the coffee shop. Maybe he didn’t think that police might cross check card number on receipt , just speculating .

 

[RubyHill]

I dont know how to quote but I will figure it out,replying to South Aussie...yep,or even Colin himself.

 

[purpleandgreen]

This could be one of them.

https://www.perthnow.com.au/news/ns...-year-old-ng-6a42aa0744d5c9857b3238c8a1bbf69b

Asked yesterday why he had not repaired his work truck after the “S” went missing from “Speddo’s”, he said simply: “Please leave.”

Surely it wasn't photoshopped out then?

 

[RubyHill]

If it turns out to be true,that BS was at that assembly and there is solid proof then the man does deserve a payout,if not he is going to take a lot of other people down with him.

 

[Bohemian]

I am pretty sure they were in 2015, according to what I read about the lawsuits. (I would have to go back and find my links, but not at this moment.) One was about the 'S' missing from the Speddo's van and the photo published thereafter. And one was about the misfact of Spedding being a convicted pedo.

From memory, the van pic lawsuit cannot go ahead, but the other lawsuit can.

I’ll take a look too. Must be in caselaw somewhere.

I think I rediscovered the Daily Mail’s ‘convicted paedo’ story and posted the link here not so long ago (last year?). The article was either edited or 404’d soon after that. (My bad, or maybe my good, depending on which side of the fence people sit on.)

 

[sosocurious]

When was the last time Col spoke to the media? Was it when bail was refused at Port?

 

[Bohemian]

Prehaps it was MS and CY and wife that attended.maybe CY did have a copy of receipt for HIS purchases that morning from the coffee shop. Maybe he didn’t think that police might cross check card number on receipt , just speculating .

There’s always takeaway coffees. Just sayin’.

 

[Thebottomline]

There’s always takeaway coffees. Just sayin’.

And spouses having same cards too .

 

[Bohemian]

And spouses having same cards too .

Exactly.

 

[Bohemian]

When was the last time Col spoke to the media? Was it when bail was refused at Port?

You mean when he was Margaret’s escort?

We’re for Sydney | Daily Telegraph

 

[Bohemian]

I dont know how to quote but I will figure it out,replying to South Aussie...yep,or even Colin himself.

Just hit the blue ‘Reply’ at the bottom of the post you want to reply to.

 

[sleepinoz]

Prehaps it was MS and CY and wife that attended.maybe CY did have a copy of receipt for HIS purchases that morning from the coffee shop. Maybe he didn’t think that police might cross check card number on receipt , just speculating .

It actually wasn't a receipt (even though he calls it one) - it was his bank card statement according to Col - doesn't really say he was there, could be anyone that used the card.

Youngberry says he believes Spedding is innocent and claims he has seen a document — a bank statement — proving he was at a cafe in Laurieton, and nowhere near Kendall, when young William was abducted.

“I have downloaded the receipt and (Spedding) has it in his hot little hand,” he adds.

Nocookies

 

[Thebottomline]

It actually wasn't a receipt (even though he calls it one) - it was his bank card statement according to Col - doesn't really say he was there, could be anyone that used the card.

Youngberry says he believes Spedding is innocent and claims he has seen a document — a bank statement — proving he was at a cafe in Laurieton, and nowhere near Kendall, when young William was abducted.

“I have downloaded the receipt and (Spedding) has it in his hot little hand,” he adds.

Nocookies

.
Sorry yes that’s what I meant. Why couldn’t BS download it himself ?

 

[RubyHill]

Just hit the blue ‘Reply’ at the bottom of the post you want to reply to.

Thanks Bohemian,I was hitting the quote button and not getting a reply box.

 

[purpleandgreen]

It actually wasn't a receipt (even though he calls it one) - it was his bank card statement according to Col - doesn't really say he was there, could be anyone that used the card.

Youngberry says he believes Spedding is innocent and claims he has seen a document — a bank statement — proving he was at a cafe in Laurieton, and nowhere near Kendall, when young William was abducted.

“I have downloaded the receipt and (Spedding) has it in his hot little hand,” he adds.

Nocookies

Well that's a huge difference, sleep. Statement and receipt - sheesh.

 

[Thebottomline]

Well that's a huge difference, sleep. Statement and receipt - sheesh.

A bank statement also won’t say what the purchase was . I guess that’s not important though but really the statement means not a lot IMO. It’s not proof he was there . I give my son my credit card every time he goes out for a night as an emergency. Has my name but with the tap option anyone could use it .

 

[RubyHill]

.
Sorry yes that’s what I meant. Why couldn’t BS download it himself ?

That is my thought too..old mate Col went out of his way to help his mate out but as we know the bank statement is useless,it really does not prove a thing..

 

[they'll get you]

What I read didn't say. It just said that the allotted time for the lawsuit had passed. An extension was not granted for that one.

An extension was granted for the other lawsuit. Because his lawyer advised him to hold off until the child sex trial was over.

I find it so hard to believe that a media outlet would deliberately photoshop someone’s business name. If so, yes I agree they should be sued.
But if some idiot hoon tore the letter off AND it wasn’t promptly replaced then isn’t it open slather because it wasn’t repaired?
Only God knows how long it was driven around in that state.

Was it a good idea at the time like twin 1 & twin 2?

If it was an idiot hoon I’d think he’d be fun company.