Australia Australia - William Tyrrell, 3, Kendall, Nsw, 12 Sept 2014 - #38

[Bohemian]

Sorry. Just wanted to keep the details of the defamation suits straight, on the thread.

Which suit was thrown out for being outside the statute of limitations? Do you remember?

 

[SouthAussie]

Which suit was thrown out for being outside the statute of limitations? Do you remember?

The photo of him by his van with the missing 'S'.

The 'convicted pedo' one was also outside the statute of limitations, but the judge allowed an extension on that case so it could proceed to jury trial, if he wishes. Because his legal counsel had advised him to wait until after his child sex charges court case before lodging the suit.

 

[Bohemian]

The photo of him by his van with the missing 'S'.

The 'convicted pedo' one was also outside the statute of limitations, but the judge allowed an extension on that case so it could proceed to jury trial, if he wishes. Because his legal counsel had advised him to wait until after his child sex charges court case before lodging the suit.

Thanks SA.

 

[RubyHill]

Thanks for explaining all the legal talk,its mind boggling for those not really sure of the legal stuff.

 

[RubyHill]

Do you all think Col will be called to the inquest?

 

[sleepinoz]

Do you all think Col will be called to the inquest?

No I don't. He only knows what BS told him.

 

[SouthAussie]

No I don't. He only knows what BS told him.

I agree. Unless he was with Spedding on that day at the relevant times, he would have nothing useful to add that was not just hearsay.

But .... if Col's wife (Margaret's cousin) was the friend who supposedly went to the assembly with Margaret, the friend who was taking photos ... she may be required at the inquest, I would think.
Whoever that woman is, she would need to be questioned as to the accuracy of the morning's activities and who was present.

 

[papertrail]

So ... did Spedding forget to tell police that he went to Buzz Cafe for a coffee? And/or that he went to the assembly? And/or that he paid for coffee by card?
His 10 page recorded interview was 'soon after' William disappeared.



Instead, at that “crucial time” when William went missing, the Speddings were sitting at the Buzz Cafe in Laurieton, 10km from Kendall, according to Mr Youngberry.

“They have got proof that they were at the cafe because he paid for the coffees by card,” he said.

Mr Spedding and his wife then attended a presentation across the road at Laurieton Primary School, where one of the grandchildren was receiving an award.

Investigators were not aware of this detail before they questioned Mr Spedding this week, Mr Youngberry said.

“But I’ve downloaded the receipt and he (Mr Spedding) has now got it in his hot little hand,” he said.
Nocookies
The Australian - January 23, 2015

Is it your opinion the 10 page statement was taken soon after William disappeared or is this stated in media?

 

[papertrail]

I agree. Unless he was with Spedding on that day at the relevant times, he would have nothing useful to add that was not just hearsay.

But .... if his wife (Margaret's cousin) was the friend who supposedly went to the assembly with Margaret, the friend who was taking photos ... she may be required at the inquest, I would think.
Whoever that woman is, she would need to be questioned as to the accuracy of the morning's activities and who was present.

The inquest is not a trial.

 

[papertrail]

The fireworks were set to go off "when his friend is legally able to make an official statement".
Presumably that was when Spedding posted his non-climatic YouTube video.
Maybe the fireworks fizzled, or were damp so they didn't go off?

Australia - Australia - William Tyrrell, 3, Kendall, Nsw, 12 Sept 2014 - #37

I would not presume or assume anything.

 

[papertrail]

Personally, I don’t care if you’re a supporter of Spedding’s or not. What I do care about about are consistently incomprehensible posts spamming William’s thread, often demeaning OP, and now alluding to some sort of conspiracy against Spedding. That, my friend, is beyond conjecture.

So you’re sure someone in Spedding’s background set him up and the person has motive? Motive for what? Setting Spedding up as a POI in William’s abduction? That is a pretty strong statement to make without anything concrete to back it up.

I suggest if you believe there has been a crime committed, such as some sort of conspiracy, that you take it to the relevant authorities. Nothing can be done about it here by discussing it with OP ad nauseum. This is is a discussion board, not the NSW Justice Department. In any case, your mate will have his day in court sooner rather than later; courtesy of the NSW Coroner.

No one is my mate thankyou. No conspiracy just good logical thinking skills.

 

[SouthAussie]

Do you all think Col will be called to the inquest?

Hopefully, we will have a WS member or two who can attend the inquest. They may relay to us the things that are allowed to be spoken of, anything that is not suppressed.

 

[papertrail]

No I don't. He only knows what BS told him.

How do you know this. He may know heaps about someone with motive. He has known Spedding for over 30 years.

Ask yourself a question. Would someone who had been to 48 benaroon drive just 3 days prior to the disappearance be stupid enough to abduct a child from that address? He would know, just like anyone with half a brain would know, the 1st thing police would do is check out individuals that were known to visit the property. And then he would also know police would discover the historic allegations. He hasn't done anything.

 

[Bohemian]

No one is my mate thankyou. No conspiracy just good logical thinking skills.

And these good, logical thinking skills result in a hypothesis able to be discussed within WS’ TOS which is supported by relevant source material? If so, please share your theory (with links to the relevant webpages).

If you can’t do same, please desist as constantly posting about something that cannot be discussed is simply spamming IMO.

 

[papertrail]

Who has been trying for years to have Spedding convicted with zero success even with DCI Jubelin on the historic case? Motive! Just may be you can't get him one way so you get him another way. It wouldn't be the 1st time vengeance was played out.

 

[papertrail]

And these good, logical thinking skills result in a hypothesis able to be discussed within WS’ TOS which is supported by relevant source material? If so, please share your theory (with links to the relevant webpages).

If you can’t do same, please desist as constantly posting about something that cannot be discussed is simply spamming IMO.

I am deeply offended at your accusation. Please desist.

 

[Bohemian]

Who has been trying for years to have Spedding convicted with zero success even with DCI Jubelin on the historic case? Motive! Just may be you can't get him one way so you get him another way. It wouldn't be the 1st time vengeance was played out.

Who? Please enlighten me, as long as your reply is within WS’ TOS and can be supported by relevant source material.

 

[Bohemian]

I am deeply offended at your accusation. Please desist.

What accusation?

 

[sleepinoz]

I'm enjoying the Ignore feature on this site

 

[Bohemian]

I'm enjoying the Ignore feature on this site

I’ve just rediscovered it.