Australia Australia - William Tyrrell, 3, Kendall, Nsw, 12 Sept 2014 - #47

[Karinna]

Rememember she was 3!!!!
Oh and she called him "Bill" (why not dad?)

Perhaps because he wasn't her dad? The previous Judge stated the children were coached, and the mother's bizarre behaviour of which she had apparently accused other men as well.
The Judge also stated it was a very weak case but the state proceeded anyway.
It was a very strange situation IMO, because her brother was also a child SO and murderer.
Who knows what on earth was going on in that household at that time? We really don't have enough information about it, and all we know is there were two child victims involved.

 

[Karo]

Why wouldnt he be paying himself?

I expect he would be paying for it himself, just like he paid for his last case, who would do pro bono for it? No one.

 

[Karo]

ONE video, and he didnt post to youtube..and that was because media was reporting incorrectly..it was so he could say what he needed to say and it would be reported correctly.

My memory says he made the video to post on his own facebook and someone copied it from there to youtube, because the quality of it on youtube is considerably worse than what I viewed on facebook.

 

[sleepinoz]

ONE video, and he didnt post to youtube..and that was because media was reporting incorrectly..it was so he could say what he needed to say and it would be reported correctly.

It's true that he didn't post the video to Youtube, but the idea to spread it around was the intention and friends and relatives (from his support group) shared it to all William's SM groups.

He didn't think of putting it on Youtube, someone else did. Now in this day and age you would think that when making such a video you would expect this to happen.

Doesn't seem like it worked for him.

 

[Loxoli]

Deleted

 

[Thebottomline]

Are you saying that the alleged 3 year old victim was BS’s daughter? This is news to me but may not be news for everyone. Is that even allowed to be posted here?

No most definitely not allowed IMO and probably the reason media quoted child as saying “Bill did it “ as to not give away their identity

 

[Loxoli]

No most definitely not allowed

Thanks, I’ll delete my comment too then.

 

[k-mac]

I tried to put up a little published info before about the good local reputation that Dean has, but it was snipped due to the mention of f_m_ly.

making assumptions and throwing someone under the bus.
sounds like a top dude!

moo

 

[SouthAussie]

It's true that he didn't post the video to Youtube, but the idea to spread it around was the intention and friends and relatives (from his support group) shared it to all William's SM groups.

He didn't think of putting it on Youtube, someone else did. Now in this day and age you would think that when making such a video you would expect this to happen.

Doesn't seem like it worked for him.

And then the video made its way to most of the major media outlets ....

Just a sample:
https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw...-denying-any-involvement-20150910-gjj8a2.html
BILL SPEDDING TAKES TO YOUTUBE TO MAINTAIN INNOCENCE IN WILLIAM TYRELL CASE | NBN News
We’re for Sydney | Daily Telegraph
Bill Spedding posts video denying involvement in William Tyrrell case – myGC.com.au
Category: | Herald Sun

 

[Georgy]

It's true that he didn't post the video to Youtube, but the idea to spread it around was the intention and friends and relatives (from his support group) shared it to all William's SM groups.

He didn't think of putting it on Youtube, someone else did. Now in this day and age you would think that when making such a video you would expect this to happen.

Doesn't seem like it worked for him.

No friends and relatives did not share to williams SM groups either

 

[Georgy]

Perhaps because he wasn't her dad? The previous Judge stated the children were coached, and the mother's bizarre behaviour of which she had apparently accused other men as well.
The Judge also stated it was a very weak case but the state proceeded anyway.
It was a very strange situation IMO, because her brother was also a child SO and murderer.
Who knows what on earth was going on in that household at that time? We really don't have enough information about it, and all we know is there were two child victims involved.

IMO it wont be long before the story can be told

 

[sleepinoz]

No friends and relatives did not share to williams SM groups either

Well I saw it happen with my own eyes, maybe not to groups but to group admins . I can even tell you who did share it, but I think you already know.

ETA - You seem to be quoting as fact - please get yourself verified before doing so - or don't quote as fact.

 

[they'll get you]

Rememember she was 3!!!!
Oh and she called him "Bill" (why not dad?)

Dad?

Where in the hell has that come from?
I think we should be having MSM links for these unvalidated left field statements.

 

[they'll get you]

No friends and relatives did not share to williams SM groups either

MSM link please.
Or is this rumour?

 

[Karo]

Spedding walks from prison

Nothing that I can locate relating to the court case where he was aquitted and I suppose it won't be for some time, until his action against police perhaps is finalised.
The whitegoods repairman was charged with five counts of sexual intercourse with a person under the age of 10 years and two counts of common assault in relation to two girls, aged three and six, in Campelltown in 1987.

During Friday’s bail application, NSW Supreme Court Justice Geoffrey Bellow said there were many "substantive issues" with the case against Mr Spedding.

"[There is a] real issue that either or both victims have been coached or cajoled into making the allegations that they make," Justice Bellow said.

"It is difficult to accept the Crown case is strong in circumstances where, as I have pointed out, that one of the victims has no recollection at all about the incident.’’

 

[SouthAussie]

Spedding walks from prison

Nothing that I can locate relating to the court case where he was aquitted and I suppose it won't be for some time, until his action against police perhaps is finalised.
The whitegoods repairman was charged with five counts of sexual intercourse with a person under the age of 10 years and two counts of common assault in relation to two girls, aged three and six, in Campelltown in 1987.

During Friday’s bail application, NSW Supreme Court Justice Geoffrey Bellow said there were many "substantive issues" with the case against Mr Spedding.

"[There is a] real issue that either or both victims have been coached or cajoled into making the allegations that they make," Justice Bellow said.

"It is difficult to accept the Crown case is strong in circumstances where, as I have pointed out, that one of the victims has no recollection at all about the incident.’’

I think it is the persistence and caliber of the lawyer he had for his court case that led to Justice Bellow's comments. Spedding's new lawyer was better able to find any weakness in a historical case and create reasonable doubt. imo

When Spedding first appeared in court on the matter, the initial magistrate thought the case was 'reasonably strong' and felt Spedding would likely be sentenced. Spedding was then refused bail for contacting one of the victims.


Solicitor Rob Hoyles had applied for bail on the basis his client had no criminal history, had strong community ties and intended to plead not guilty.
But the magistrate said it was a "reasonably strong prosecution case" with a "custodial sentence likely".
Spedding applies for bail

Mr Spedding was refused bail at Port Macquarie Local Court in April after the magistrate read court documents alleging he had tried to contact one of his alleged victims and asked them to write a character reference for him.
https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw...dering-rapist-court-told-20150615-ghnx8h.html

 

[Karinna]

I think it is the persistence and caliber of the lawyer he had for his court case that led to Justice Bellow's comments. Spedding's new lawyer was better able to find any weakness in a historical case and create reasonable doubt. imo

When Spedding first appeared in court on the matter, the initial magistrate thought the case was 'reasonably strong' and felt Spedding would likely be sentenced. Spedding was then refused bail for contacting one of the victims.


Solicitor Rob Hoyles had applied for bail on the basis his client had no criminal history, had strong community ties and intended to plead not guilty.
But the magistrate said it was a "reasonably strong prosecution case" with a "custodial sentence likely".
Spedding applies for bail

Mr Spedding was refused bail at Port Macquarie Local Court in April after the magistrate read court documents alleging he had tried to contact one of his alleged victims and asked them to write a character reference for him.
https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw...dering-rapist-court-told-20150615-ghnx8h.html

BBM, And that makes me wonder if he was related somehow to one of the alleged victims? because otherwise what he was asking makes no sense IMO.

 

[they'll get you]

IMO DP changed his story because there was clear evidence it was NOT BS van he saw..

Is this your opinion?
Please provide an msm link.

 

[purpleandgreen]

Why wouldnt he be paying himself?

Sorry but he seems to have been crying poor for a few years IMO. After all isn’t that what his current court cases are all about? The almighty $ to compensate for lack of earnings etc, etc etc.

If he can afford a high priced lawyer then one would think his court case for loss of earnings is null and void. But if course that’s just my opinion.

 

[purpleandgreen]

ONE video, and he didnt post to youtube..and that was because media was reporting incorrectly..it was so he could say what he needed to say and it would be reported correctly.

Maybe Col advised him to do it? Whatever, it sure didn’t do his cause any good. IMO.