Why does it even matter? Neither MS or BS have been convicted of a crime in WT's case.A few months ago, Youngberry reveals, Margaret Spedding went to a clairvoyant. He says he’s heard the tape recording of the conversation. Margaret asked the clairvoyant if her husband had been involved in any way in William’s disappearance. The clairvoyant reassured her he hadn’t. “That made her feel good,” Youngberry says.
So ... what could be the reasons for Margaret's question?
1. Spedding wasn't with her at the assembly
OR
2. Spedding was with her at the assembly but she was still afraid he could have been somehow involved
AND/OR
3. She doesn't completely trust Spedding with regard to young children
imo
Australian Crime News
MS was never even a POI to my knowledge.
Everything, their home, their vehicle/s, the place BS conducted a business from was gone over forensically with a fine tooth comb, and there was nothing to implicate either one in this crime.
I'm just not sure why they are repeatedly being questioned as to what they did?
Nothing has even come out at the Inquest other than alibis were verified, :/
I think IMO it's pretty much a done deal as far as that goes.