Australia Australia - William Tyrrell, 3, Kendall, Nsw, 12 Sept 2014 - #49

[katydid23]

All I am doing is posting facts.

The FM said herself that she went inside to make a cup of tea.

I am NOT victim-blaming, but some of you people are misquoting what actually happened and what didn't.

So what. That makes her guilty of something?

 

[Georgy]

William was not in sight of the FM or the FGM when he disappeared.

Paul Spedding told the court that when he went to speak to William's foster grandmother – a 30-second conversation – she told him that William's foster mother had left him outside while she went in to make a cup of tea.

You have your names mixed up...and a few other things IMO

 

[Georgy]

So what. That makes her guilty of something?

I dont believe Kate is saying anyone is guilty of anything..she is merely stating a version of what she has read..

 

[KateM]

So what. That makes her guilty of something?

No, not at all. But strictly speaking, William was out of her sight on a semi-rural property when he disappeared.

 

[katydid23]

No, not at all. But strictly speaking, William was out of her sight on a semi-rural property when he disappeared.

Semi-rural? How so? It looks like a suburb in a nice village to me.

Who doesn't allow their children to be out of sight sometimes? You cannot have eyes upon your child at every moment. Life happens.

 

[katydid23]

I dont believe Kate is saying anyone is guilty of anything..she is merely stating a version of what she has read..

It appears to me that there is a subtle inference of guilt...otherwise why keep saying the same thing over and over---'she didn't have her eyes on her child---he wasn't supervised---she went and made tea---'....

 

[peekinandy]

Because this is her testimony from the Inquest. If you have a problem with that maybe you should be the Coroner.

The FP and Bio Parents have previously been cleared by the Police. As per WS TOS, we can only discuss what has been reported, what is stated at the Inquest is taken to be more reliable than what has been, in the past, reported by MSM. If you don't like the rules, take it up with a Moderator.

If you doubt what is being said, take it to Crime Stoppers, this is not the place to question it.

I just spat my beer !

 

[KateM]

It appears to me that there is a subtle inference of guilt...otherwise why keep saying the same thing over and over---'she didn't have her eyes on her child---he wasn't supervised---she went and made tea---'....

Only because some members here insist on keeping my original post going and have categorically and INCORRECTLY said that William was being watched when he disappeared. He may have been up to that point, but not at the time he went missing.

I am hoping that something positive comes out of the next Inquest and we get some much-needed answers on what happened to William.

 

[katydid23]

No, not at all. But strictly speaking, William was out of her sight on a semi-rural property when he disappeared.

Kate, how many children have been kidnapped in Kendall in the past decade? Is it something the family would be concerned with, as they drank tea on the deck, while the children played in the yard:?

 

[suspicious]

even if she was inside. There is no blame. The only person we can lay blame is to the person who put their hands on a child who was not theirs to do so.
Physically impossible to have sight on your kids 24/7.

I hope that 2020 is the year we get answers.

 

[Georgy]

Semi-rural? How so? It looks like a suburb in a nice village to me.

Who doesn't allow their children to be out of sight sometimes? You cannot have eyes upon your child at every moment. Life happens.

I would say Kendall is semi rural

 

[katydid23]

Only because some members here insist on keeping my original post going and have categorically and INCORRECTLY said that William was being watched when he disappeared. He may have been up to that point, but not at the time he went missing.

I am hoping that something positive comes out of the next Inquest and we get some much-needed answers on what happened to William.

When we 'watch' our children play in the yard, we may not have our eyes firmly glued upon them at every moment. We can sit and drink tea, talk with another adult, and listen to the children as they run and skip and play below the deck.

That is usually, I'd say 99% of the time, quite a safe and normal way to parent. No one expects a predator to be lurking about. It is tragic and devastating. But it was not expected that morning on Benaroon Drive.

 

[katydid23]

I would say Kendall is semi rural

I guess when I think of rural, I think of homes that are much further apart. My cousins live in rural Northern California and their neighbours are quite a long walk away. No one is right next door like on Benaroon.

 

[Karinna]

Kate, how many children have been kidnapped in Kendall in the past decade? Is it something the family would be concerned with, as they drank tea on the deck, while the children played in the yard:?

What are the odds eh? Never before and never since.

 

[Karinna]

I guess when I think of rural, I think of homes that are much further apart. My cousins live in rural Northern California and their neighbours are quite a long walk away. No one is right next door like on Benaroon.

From what i have read Benaroon is in a very quiet cul de sac. And where nothing gets past the people living there because they all notice.

 

[Deleted member 102539]

From your link....

She had just made herself a cup of tea when she realised the little boy had gone quiet.

That's correct they HAD just made a cup of tea & were out on the deck drinking said tea.

They were NOT inside making the cup of tea when poor William vanished.

I only believe it, because YOU are saying it and you have been at the inquest. I'm trusting you.

 

[SouthAussie]

I guess when I think of rural, I think of homes that are much further apart. My cousins live in rural Northern California and their neighbours are quite a long walk away. No one is right next door like on Benaroon.

Yes. Kendall is a country town. It is not rural, it is not city. It is a town (or village) of over 1,100 people. And FGM lived in a designed development ... a neighbourhood.

Unfortunately, there is a high proportion of sex offenders in that general area. And I think we will find that most, if not all, of the POIs fall into that category. Although there is a good chance we will never know that for sure, due to our privacy around pedos and their activities.

 

[Karinna]

Yes. Kendall is a country town. It is not rural, it is not city. It is a town (or village) of over 1,100 people. And FGM lived in a designed development ... a neighbourhood.

Unfortunately, there is a high proportion of sex offenders in that general area. And I think we will find that most, if not all, of the POIs fall into that category. Although there is a good chance we will never know that for sure, due to our privacy around pedos and their activities.

I don't think it matters where we live nowadays but predators are in all locations throughout the country. It's like an epedemic these days from what media portrays to the public.
I think in WT's case we have to look at why specifically was WT targeted when he was not a resident of Kendall? They hadn't even been there 24 hours and WT disappeared. Who even knew he was there, because from what we know nobody followed the FC's to that location. So why did the little boy go missing from a location that was considered "safe" per FFC's statements about it, and how other children always played on the street just fine without any problems?

 

[Karinna]

So per the Inquest that DS attended, the story is that FFC and her mother were drinking tea and were outside with the children, when WT ran around the side of the house and disappeared? When was the tea made then?, because someone would of made the tea obviously.
What about the story where she told WT to go out the front and see MFC was back from town yet?
Or is that just another conflicting story as so many others have been in this case that we have read in MSM? Who to believe? What is a reliable source of MSM, or is all the confusion good when people are trying to sort fact from fiction, and who does it benefit exactly?
And as far as the public is aware there is still a dangerous child stealing abductor/predator out there on the loose.

 

[sleepinoz]

I don't think it matters where we live nowadays but predators are in all locations throughout the country. It's like an epedemic these days from what media portrays to the public.
I think in WT's case we have to look at why specifically was WT targeted when he was not a resident of Kendall? They hadn't even been there 24 hours and WT disappeared. Who even knew he was there, because from what we know nobody followed the FC's to that location. So why did the little boy go missing from a location that was considered "safe" per FFC's statements about it, and how other children always played on the street just fine without any problems?

BBM - A different scenario - what if they were followed? It's possible a tracking device was placed on their vehicle and then removed when they arrived at Kendall.

I know it was mentioned that Police checked for a tracking device, but what if it was removed in the dark when they arrived and before Police searched the vehicle?

Some are small and not that expensive.

Just a thought.