Bohemian
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 6, 2015
- Messages
- 10,370
- Reaction score
- 16,630
Not sure why he wasn’t charged but if the alleged recordings weren’t between PS and Jubes, I wondered if the tendency evidence might involve those between the latter and Mark Leveson, mentioned here:The prosecution on Tuesday said they wished to present to the hearing additional recordings taken by Jubelin which were not subject to charges.
The prosecution told the court this evidence would demonstrate Jubelin's "tendency" to illegally record phone conversations.
"The Crown will be serving a tendency notice in relation to at least one of those recordings," Crown prosecutor Philip Hogan said.
Jubelin defends actions as hearing nears
Yes why wasn't he charged for the other alleged illegal recordings?
Is the tendency notice the crown is serving, an additional recording of PS? Or is it of another person?
9News - Latest news and headlines from Australia and the world