Australia Australia - William Tyrrell, 3, Kendall, Nsw, 12 Sept 2014 - #52

[sleepinoz]

Just to add to my post. As on a computer/phone etc, if a photo is altered properties will usually show a created time, modified time and a time last accessed.

IMO only by testing the time on the camera by taking additional photo's would you be able to 'correct' the time from Created to Corrected time. Hope I'm explaining this properly.

 

[Thebottomline]

Agree, and it just adds so much more confusion to an already confusing case IMO.
How much of that is the fault of MSM though? And where do they get their information & fact check?

Karinna, I agree so much with this actually

 

[interested64]

No-one apart from the FFC saw those cars and even the Coroner questioned the accuracy of her claim.

You can't take it as a given.

and you cant take that it wasnt

 

[Karinna]

I could be wrong, but I took it as being corrected by the forensic software company not anyone else:

The report, obtained by The Australian, was generated by X-Ways forensic software. It reveals the image is a .jpg created on a digital camera, and it says: “Created: 12/09/2014 07:39:54. Corrected time: 12/09/2014 09:37:44.”


Probe into William photo

ETA: I don't think a camera will show created and corrected times. MOO

From my understanding of it the EXIF data will show exactly what time and where the photos were taken.
EXIF Data: What It Is & Why You Need It Now

 

[sleepinoz]

From my understanding of it the EXIF data will show exactly what time and where the photos were taken.
EXIF Data: What It Is & Why You Need It Now

Yes it will, but it won't correct it. That's what the forensic software is used for.

 

[Thebottomline]

Weren’t the kids heard though, around or before photo. I think there will be a simple explanation for time stamp

 

[interested64]

Agree, and it just adds so much more confusion to an already confusing case IMO.
How much of that is the fault of MSM though? And where do they get their information & fact check?

not just msm,social media has and is paying a big part in the amount written and that makes others believe and spread

 

[interested64]

Weren’t the kids heard though, around or before photo. I think there will be a simple explanation for time stamp

yes they were

 

[Thebottomline]

not just msm,social media has and is paying a big part in the amount written and that makes others believe and spread

Yes I agree, if William want a foster child I think it would be different. Too many meddling people trying to make it about his custodial status.

 

[Chrissy74]

Yes it will, but it won't correct it. That's what the forensic software is used for.

I found this info might be useful but either way photos would need to be uploaded in order to make the necessary changes and if you’re saying those changes were made by forensic software then that would mean the changes were made by forensics and not the foster family. Why would they do that that’s odd

I just found the answer.
Lightroom will change the date/time easily by selecting the image you know the proper time for, then select all others to be changed - similar to how develop sync settings works.

After the selection is made, click

Metadata -> Edit Capture Time

Select Change to a specified date and time

Enter the proper date and time for that one image, Lightroom will adjust all other selected images by the same amount, relative to each image's own original time.

 

[Chrissy74]

Yes I agree, if William want a foster child I think it would be different. Too many meddling people trying to make it about his custodial status.

I’m not sure that’s a fair statement to make. Williams custodial status is the foundation of who William is. It’s an insight to his life. Would it be any different for a missing child who wasn’t a foster child well I should hope not. The questions being raised are not because he was a foster child that’s ridiculous. This is a case of a missing child not a foster child.

 

[Thebottomline]

I found this info might be useful but either way photos would need to be uploaded in order to make the necessary changes and if you’re saying those changes were made by forensic software then that would mean the changes were made by forensics and not the foster family. Why would they do that that’s odd

I just found the answer.
Lightroom will change the date/time easily by selecting the image you know the proper time for, then select all others to be changed - similar to how develop sync settings works.

After the selection is made, click

Metadata -> Edit Capture Time

Select Change to a specified date and time

Enter the proper date and time for that one image, Lightroom will adjust all other selected images by the same amount, relative to each image's own original time.

Wait for next week, the actual experts, not google will give us the answers

 

[Chrissy74]

Wait for next week, the actual experts, not google will give us the answers

Yeh fair call.

 

[Karinna]

Yes it will, but it won't correct it. That's what the forensic software is used for.

You can easily change data yourself though
(quote)
Home
Organize Pictures
How to change digital photos’ date and time
How to change digital photos’ date and time

Read on to learn how to change a photo’s date and time.


https://www.organizepictures.com/2014/11/photo-metadata-guide
Here are the steps for editing a photo’s timestamp with XnView MP.
How to change digital photos' date and time | Organize Pictures

 

[Thebottomline]

I’m not sure that’s a fair statement to make. Williams custodial status is the foundation of who William is. It’s an insight to his life. Would it be any different for a missing child who wasn’t a foster child well I should hope not. The questions being raised are not because he was a foster child that’s ridiculous. This is a case of a missing child not a foster child.

It’s not ridiculous at all, it was a response to someone else . You’ve misread my post/reply. The investigation should be as normal to any missing child but the speculation on Sm and further all relates to his status as a foster child. It shouldn’t but it is what it is and the uninformed all allude to William being abducted, killed ( god forbid ) for his status

 

[Karinna]

not just msm,social media has and is paying a big part in the amount written and that makes others believe and spread

That is not unusual and happens in every high profile case here on WS. SM is a big part of people's lives nowadays, and i think it is unavoidable when crimes happen to people and everyone wants to talk about it, and everyone has their opinions on it. Not everyone is going to agree either.

 

[Chrissy74]

It’s not ridiculous at all, it was a response to someone else . You’ve misread my post/reply

The original post was in reference to MSM and the media yes I did read that comment prior to yours. For sure the media can play a huge role in persuading and influencing its readers to think and see things a certain way but your comment was suggestive of the media presenting information that centres around Williams custodial status. If for example William wasn’t a foster child but everything else was the same but instead of foster parents it would be biological parents in the spotlight I can’t see how media reporting would be any different or how discussions between interested people on social media would be any different.I respect that some members feel strongly about the foster parents and support them and that’s fair enough. I on the other hand prefer to look every possible scenario without bias that which is plausible of course

 

[JLZ]

I could be wrong, but I took it as being corrected by the forensic software company not anyone else:

The report, obtained by The Australian, was generated by X-Ways forensic software. It reveals the image is a .jpg created on a digital camera, and it says: “Created: 12/09/2014 07:39:54. Corrected time: 12/09/2014 09:37:44.”


Probe into William photo

ETA: I don't think a camera will show created and corrected times. MOO

Where would the forensic software be pulling the corrected time from then? Perhaps the created time stamp includes the time zone it was originally set to, so that the corrected time can be inferred from the created time together with the location of the photographed place. But then what does the two-minute discrepancy mean?

Now I'll try to shut up.

 

[Tinker Taylor]

https://www.howtogeek.com/203592/what-is-exif-data-and-how-to-remove-it/

 

[Chrissy74]

Taking into account the fact that the time stamp on the last photo taken was bought to the attention of the coroner by the legal representation for wt biological father at the last inquest. Shouldn’t this CRUCIAL piece of evidence been presented to the coroner prior to the inquest?