Australia Australia - William Tyrrell, 3, Kendall, Nsw, 12 Sept 2014 - #52

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #1,701
yes I agree. Maybe she is using a bit of poetic license here, trying to be mysterious. If we remove everything that is false the truth will be there etc.. Solve it already then. MOO
"when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth"? as the great Sherlock Holmes was wont to say.
 
  • #1,702
That much I understand. What I don't understand is why anyone thinks the pics were actually taken at 7.30am and what that would actually achieve? What do they think actually happened? How did it play out from there on in? Did they fake the sound of children playing?

I think that the time on the camera was out by 2hrs, not that the pics were taken at 2hrs earlier. Whether that had anything to do with Bali or not, it's quite possible for the time to be set incorrectly.

However, I also think it had to be investigated and proven. If the time WAS correct, then there would be 2hrs unaccounted for that morning (unlikely) and that would need to be addressed.
 
  • #1,703
That much I understand. What I don't understand is why anyone thinks the pics were actually taken at 7.30am and what that would actually achieve? What do they think actually happened? How did it play out from there on in? Did they fake the sound of children playing?

Wexford, IMO the only reason that the photos are/ have/ been/being " forensically examined" is because a certain advocate group got their hands on part of the brief & saw this "corrected " time & thought that they could try to discredit the FF ..........again IMO MOO etc. :rolleyes:

It makes no sense at all the the pics were taken @ 07:30 ish & I also think the police have known this all along IMO

I wouldn't be surprised if we hear nothing more on these photos to be honest, if they are as always has been stated & taken @ 09:35 ish .
 
  • #1,704
Wexford, IMO the only reason that the photos are/ have/ been/being " forensically examined" is because a certain advocate group got their hands on part of the brief & saw this "corrected " time & thought that they could try to discredit the FF ..........again IMO MOO etc. :rolleyes:

It makes no sense at all the the pics were taken @ 07:30 ish & I also think the police have known this all along IMO

I wouldn't be surprised if we hear nothing more on these photos to be honest, if they are as always has been stated & taken @ 09:35 ish .
Amen to that, doc.
 
  • #1,705
Wexford, IMO the only reason that the photos are/ have/ been/being " forensically examined" is because a certain advocate group got their hands on part of the brief & saw this "corrected " time & thought that they could try to discredit the FF ..........again IMO MOO etc. :rolleyes:

It makes no sense at all the the pics were taken @ 07:30 ish & I also think the police have known this all along IMO

I wouldn't be surprised if we hear nothing more on these photos to be honest, if they are as always has been stated & taken @ 09:35 ish .

Agree entirely. Possibly Ms Grahame is only having it examined to indulge Ms Swift and close down speculation with forensic detail which can't be refuted. I highly doubt Ms Grahame thinks there is a discrepancy. IMO
 
Last edited:
  • #1,706
Dr Sleuth, hope you go to some of this inquest, very grateful for your excellent reports last time.
So much happens in the courtroom that doesnt get reported on.
 
  • #1,707
Wexford, IMO the only reason that the photos are/ have/ been/being " forensically examined" is because a certain advocate group got their hands on part of the brief & saw this "corrected " time & thought that they could try to discredit the FF ..........again IMO MOO etc. :rolleyes:

It makes no sense at all the the pics were taken @ 07:30 ish & I also think the police have known this all along IMO

I wouldn't be surprised if we hear nothing more on these photos to be honest, if they are as always has been stated & taken @ 09:35 ish .

No actually , coroner Harriet Grahame probe ordered the photos urgently as there WAS confusion , in regards to the created and corrected times of the photo.

That confusion needs and has been forensically looked into.

Everything needs to be thoroughly checked, or why bother with an inquest.
 
  • #1,708
No actually , coroner Harriet Grahame probe ordered the photos urgently as there WAS confusion , in regards to the created and corrected times of the photo.

That confusion needs and has been forensically looked into.

Everything needs to be thoroughly checked, or why bother with an inquest.


NoCookies | The Australian

The Australian understands Ms Grahame last week agreed to an application by Michelle Swift, counsel for William’s biological father, for further forensic testing of the image.

Ms Swift’s application was made in open court shortly before the inquest was suddenly adjourned for seven months. The subject matter wasn’t revealed, and Ms Swift refused to comment. However, Ms Grahame responded to the application by saying the matter needed investigation, and Mr Craddock agreed it was important.
 
  • #1,709
NoCookies | The Australian

The Australian understands Ms Grahame last week agreed to an application by Michelle Swift, counsel for William’s biological father, for further forensic testing of the image.

Ms Swift’s application was made in open court shortly before the inquest was suddenly adjourned for seven months. The subject matter wasn’t revealed, and Ms Swift refused to comment. However, Ms Grahame responded to the application by saying the matter needed investigation, and Mr Craddock agreed it was important.

Correct! It's important.
I don't understand why anyone would think that it isn't.
 
  • #1,710
No actually , coroner Harriet Grahame probe ordered the photos urgently as there WAS confusion , in regards to the created and corrected times of the photo.

That confusion needs and has been forensically looked into.

Everything needs to be thoroughly checked, or why bother with an inquest.

So in theory what could of happened if that photo was 2 hours earlier?

Missing time would still be the same regardless?
 
  • #1,711
So in theory what could of happened if that photo was 2 hours earlier?

Missing time would still be the same regardless?

Two hours would need to be accounted for.
 
  • #1,712
  • #1,713
In Caroline's book, she quotes CCTV evidence picked up FF car on the road before 8:40am.

I was always lead to believe he left between 9 -9:30am that morning.
 
  • #1,714
That’s ludicrous..

Ok well hopefully that’s all sorted so they can get on with the inquest.
Yes and kids heard playing. Will be a storm in a teacup I think
 
  • #1,715
That much I understand. What I don't understand is why anyone thinks the pics were actually taken at 7.30am and what that would actually achieve? What do they think actually happened? How did it play out from there on in? Did they fake the sound of children playing?
It's the smoking gun. :rolleyes:
People with a certain theory are desperately waiting for the 'gotcha' moment and that they KNEW all along.
The ff's movements were thoroughly checked, as is the procedure as everyone is a suspect until cleared, and those suspicious of ff feign surprise, as if the ff were spared scrutiny by the police. o_O

Sometimes I don't get their thinking, maybe ignorant about police procedures? :confused:
 
  • #1,716
In Caroline's book, she quotes CCTV evidence picked up FF car on the road before 8:40am.

I was always lead to believe he left between 9 -9:30am that morning.
Who lead you to believe that?
 
  • #1,717
In Caroline's book, she quotes CCTV evidence picked up FF car on the road before 8:40am.

I was always lead to believe he left between 9 -9:30am that morning.
Caroline Overington can say what she likes but she is not a member of the police investigation in this case.
 
  • #1,718
In Caroline's book, she quotes CCTV evidence picked up FF car on the road before 8:40am.

I was always lead to believe he left between 9 -9:30am that morning.
Hopefully Caroline has fact checked or she might end up in jube’s current shoes
 
  • #1,719
It's the smoking gun. :rolleyes:
People with a certain theory are desperately waiting for the 'gotcha' moment and that they KNEW all along.
The ff's movements were thoroughly checked, as is the procedure as everyone is a suspect until cleared, and those suspicious of ff feign surprise, as if the ff were spared scrutiny by the police. o_O

Sometimes I don't get their thinking, maybe ignorant about police procedures? :confused:
Flogging a dead horse over and over
 
  • #1,720
In Caroline's book, she quotes CCTV evidence picked up FF car on the road before 8:40am.

I was always lead to believe he left between 9 -9:30am that morning.

People have to learn not to believe MSM up until the point of the Inquest - so much misreporting.

Listen to evidence not hearsay.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
101
Guests online
3,219
Total visitors
3,320

Forum statistics

Threads
632,661
Messages
18,629,845
Members
243,237
Latest member
talu
Back
Top