Lunarmoth
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 16, 2021
- Messages
- 34
- Reaction score
- 336
What is the weird obsession in the thread with PS. If there's no evidence of an accident on his premises or on his vehicles, and no history of him having inappropriate actions with or toward children, why do people still consider this theory that he is connected credible? What am I missing?
GJ investigated him for several years and could never even name his as a Person of Interest in the case.
The evidence presented here that he is nefarious in some way tells us this about him:
1. He has an (unwelcome) interest in adult presenting females, not children
2. He is social enough with his neighbors to offer them assistance when they are experiencing difficult times
3. At one point he spoke to his dead wife out loud professing fear and anxiety in an illegally recorded conversation
If there's no evidence his car was involved in an accident there is literally no logical evidence connecting PS to the disappearance of WT and I am fairly sure if there was, GJ would not have had to defend his decision to record him without warrant before a court.
GJ investigated him for several years and could never even name his as a Person of Interest in the case.
The evidence presented here that he is nefarious in some way tells us this about him:
1. He has an (unwelcome) interest in adult presenting females, not children
2. He is social enough with his neighbors to offer them assistance when they are experiencing difficult times
3. At one point he spoke to his dead wife out loud professing fear and anxiety in an illegally recorded conversation
If there's no evidence his car was involved in an accident there is literally no logical evidence connecting PS to the disappearance of WT and I am fairly sure if there was, GJ would not have had to defend his decision to record him without warrant before a court.