Bernina
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2013
- Messages
- 11,444
- Reaction score
- 6,071
I just hope that the Scottsdale LE knows more than we do. I fear this case is going cold.:tantrum:
I'm right there with you, Luvrosco!
I just hope that the Scottsdale LE knows more than we do. I fear this case is going cold.:tantrum:
I just hope that the Scottsdale LE knows more than we do. I fear this case is going cold.:tantrum:
I'm right there with you, Luvrosco!
I have no doubt that you'll continue to press LE. I just wish there was one statement coming from someone. Her family, BF, coworkers,neighbors,but nothing:gaah:No way this case is going cold. I only live 5 minutes away from the SPD.
:fence:
I sure hate to think what anyone just starting to look at this thread might think, after our little fiasco of the day.
:gaah:
Thanks for input. Glad someone reading who has more cell phone knowledge than I have.
I just did a test with my iphone and my wife's iphone to clarify. After I powered down her phone, I sent her a text, and on my phone there were no notifications (there was no red 'not delivered' like I get when I am out of cell phone range). My phone did not say 'delivered' in grey letters however, until I turned her phone back on. So the real question to the father is, did his message to Allison say 'not delivered' in red, or did his text to her simply lack the grey lettered 'delivered' confirmation message?
IMO:
If Allison's father's imessage to her said 'not delivered', I would guess Allison's phone was broken at that point.
If his imessage was missing the 'delivered' confirmation in grey letters, then her phone was probably turned off.
Either way, it seems likely that her father expected his text to go through, and it did not, which is reasonable grounds for foul play, considering we have so little information to go on, and she clearly communicated with her family often, and possibly every day.
Now, regarding tracking a phone that has been turned off after the fact, ARMCHAIR DETECTIVE, do you know anything about that sort of thing? Clearly if the phone was broken it could not be tracked, but if just powered down, I imagine it COULD be possible.
Did you try removing the SIM card? There should be a small door on the side of the phone with a hole to insert a paper clip
That should do the trick.
Cumulus, that's what I'm thinking,too.
Thanks for the welcome.I will definitely look into the invitation once I have a little more time. I've got plans and am about to walk out the door.
It's so disturbing to me to think that whoever did this is still out there! It's also made me much more aware of my surroundings and who could be watching or around my home.
I really go back and forth on whether it was someone very close to her or someone she has had contact with in the past or home maintenance, etc.
You just think that anyone close to her (bf or other) would have already had their DNA taken and ruled out.
It seems due to the lack on information, all we can do is continue to speculate. I wonder if the DNA from under the fingernails is a ruse, and they have an idea of who did it, but need something to tie this person to the murder due to no DNA. Otherwise, the other option is they have the DNA from the killer, and no suspects. These seem to be the two options, since a DNA match is pretty conclusive.
There must be some strategy going on, and somehow the Tiffany bracelet ties into it. I guess it could be as simple as waiting a month for the killer to give someone or show someone the bracelet, and then by making it public info getting the someone who has seen the bracelet to call LE. But I am hoping it is more in depth than that, and this waiting game will draw out the killer. How, I do not know.
Another thought, since LE think the killer left the house around 1:05 am, and I get the impression he left on foot, I hope they checked the Pima School security cams at around 1:15. I would think that would have been one of the first things they did, check any cam they know about within a square mile around that time period.
If the culprit walked home in the vicinity, he/she must have shown up clearly on somebody's cam. Too bad LE can't sync up all known cameras into a huge multicam, and look for a pedestrian or any cars driving in the vicinity after 1am. I realize it was dark, and maybe LE needs a warrant to check all cams, but it sure would simplify their hunt, and running license plates and getting DNA samples from anyone driving by around that time could in theory lead to catching the killer. I imagine it is pretty complicated dealing with all the security companies, but I would guess people would accept the loss in privacy for catching a killer on the loose.
Also, they said the murderer would have had scratch marks on his arms and so on.
Not trying to change the subject, but I had a thought this morning. The white substance around AF's body could possibly be a Bleach Powder, or Chlorine Powder, maybe used for swimming pools.
I also read that some people use a teaspoon of bleach in water to keep cut flowers alive longer.
I'm also thinking that the killer would have taken AL's telephone because it could hold possible evidence about him. Think about this: (I) we, never write anything down anymore. Everything is on our phone.
That means any information she would have about contractors, swimming pools cleaners etc. Or information about anything else would be on our phones.
I think the DNA from under Allison's nails is an assumption as LE said she fought back and that they had DNA.
Ooo
I thought the same thing about the phone. Which is why,I believe there's something on her phone to incriminate her killer.