AZ AZ - Allison Feldman, 31, Scottsdale, 18 Feb 2015 #2

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #501
Grabbed a screen shot of the nieghbors and AF's home, pre-remodeling, so it's that green house.
ADT has 24 hour monitoring, anything caught on video would be stored at one of their monitoring centers, for how long, I don't know, but it's a plus if LE wants to go backwards in time. If the neighbors were storing their own video, they would more than likely have a removable hard drive that LE could take or download to a disk. Those units store no less than 30 days of video before they re-write over the previous video.
The camera being used by that neighbor is a "bullet" camera. If this part of a "security package", the least amount of range I could find is 65' with the infra red illuminators (IR). That means the camera could pick up fairly clear images at 65' in the dark.
I did a quick line structure to show the range that covers AF's house. That particular camera the way it's placed losses part of it's left side video because it's catching the edge of the house and wall, but it should have a clear view of the front of AF's garage and anyone who is walking to or from the front door. Not going "in" or "out" of the door, but definitely once out of the vestibule.

AF camera 3.jpg

That type of camera usually has a 45 degree visual range, the eaves from both houses reduce the upper range.
The question is: Did the neighbor have a 4, 8, or ? camera system, and where and what were they pointed towards? They don't have pan or tilt which it looks like ADT is now installing with their dome cameras. (unless they have mixed cameras)

The law in Arizona specifies that cameras can't be pointed in an area where a neighbor would expect a reasonable amount of privacy, bedroom windows, bathrooms, over privacy/perimeter fences. Your front yard and driveway doesn't have that "privacy" if it is exposed to street traffic that can visually see it. Now pointing a camera directly across the street at someone's place is an entirely different situation. LE could be called to have them see what exactly was being streamed and tell the owner to adjust the angle lower.
I don't have a cell phone, but there is a setting for night pics. If you set your phone for that and scan it around a neighborhood in the dark, you can see where IR is being used, and in neighborhood like AF's, that would indicate security cameras at the point where the illumination starts. Miss D, if you happen to go into that neighborhood on another night, you should check it out. Many Sony cameras also have a "night shot" setting.
My brother has been installing security systems for almost 30 years (private contractor) and uses his phone to make sure the IR's on a camera are working properly. (Shield the camera, and place the phone in front of the IR bulbs)
 
  • #502
I wondered that as well. That light would get on my nerves. Also, another neighbor, havering a camera pointing at my driveway, would be disturbing as well.

One thing that just came to me is the fact that AF did a lot of traveling, and this could have made a burglar take notice. Could the killer have been a burglar ?

Eh, are you sure you wanna go that direction, cause I'll tell you, it's a very small group of one! :floorlaugh: That would be me, and I will go down with the ship if that's not the case!
 
  • #503
About Allison's dating habits:

I suppose that traveling as much as she did it was a natural thing for her to use a dating service to find suitable men to go out with.

After all, even attractive young women like Allison can find it hard to meet the right guys, unless you hang out in the bars all the time. And those are not necessarily the 'right guys'. And it wasn't Allison's style.

But I was wondering, since, according to the article in TCJewfolk.com:

"She poked around on JDate, and at the time of her death had been seeing a Jewish guy for about eight months. "


I was just wondering if any of these sites do background checks. I'm thinking if I met anyone on a dating site, before I got in really deep with them, I would want to know a little bit more about them.

You just never know what might be in someone's background...unless you check. The same goes for a girl. There's nothing wrong with a guy doing a background check on a woman too.

(I want to make sure I'm not gender discriminating here!)

:shame:

http://tcjewfolk.com/remembering-allison-feldman/
 
  • #504
Eh, are you sure you wanna go that direction, cause I'll tell you, it's a very small group of one! :floorlaugh: That would be me, and I will go down with the ship if that's not the case!

:floorlaugh: :floorlaugh: :floorlaugh: :floorlaugh:

I love your integrity!

btw: My BF wanted me to ask you if, since your 'first ex' was a Burglar, did he 'rob' you of your virginity?

lmao!!!! It was HIS question. NOT MINE!

:blushing::blushing::blushing:
 
  • #505
That's right, Colette! We don't know if or when he left, do we?

You know that's right. I never picked up on this. We only have his word that he was told to leave to go and study. Hmmm
 
  • #506
:floorlaugh: :floorlaugh: :floorlaugh: :floorlaugh:

I love your integrity!

btw: My BF wanted me to ask you if, since your 'first ex' was a Burglar, did he 'rob' you of your virginity?

lmao!!!! It was HIS question. NOT MINE!

:blushing::blushing::blushing:

Naw, he got me after I spent 2 years "sowing my oats" so to speak, lol! But I did know him from the time I was 4 years old, I just didn't know what he was into because his family only discussed the "good things" about him.
I guess I impressed him when I first met him (at 4) when I wasn't scared of some snake eggs he had found in their orchard. Their place was actually right across the street from what is now the Phoenician Resort. HUGE grapefruit orchard.
 
  • #507
Naw, he got me after I spent 2 years "sowing my oats" so to speak, lol! But I did know him from the time I was 4 years old, I just didn't know what he was into because his family only discussed the "good things" about him.
I guess I impressed him when I first met him (at 4) when I wasn't scared of some snake eggs he had found in their orchard. Their place was actually right across the street from what is now the Phoenician Resort. HUGE grapefruit orchard.

LOL! We have grapefruit trees in our front yard! I just asked my BF if grapefruit trees draw snakes. He said "I didn't even know grapefruits could draw!"

See what I have to put up with? :facepalm:
 
  • #508
Good luck with that Bernina! I just took a look at the John Doe twitter account. Good job!

I think my BF is going to kick me out if I get involved in anything else like this. He isn't happy with me at the moment over my obsession.

But I'll see what I can do.

:)
 
  • #509
Websleuths shows up on "Google Alerts", which I thought was strange since it wasn't MSM, so he could be catching our activity and anything posted on the Web by MSM about the case. I have my alerts set for key words "Allison Feldman".
(sniped by me) If they search her name through Google, WS does come up. If you search thru "Google news" then you get the MSM.
 
  • #510
For some reason I thought the cam was across the street from Allison, not next door. Are were sure which neighbor had the cam, or did 2 have them?
 
  • #511
For some reason I thought the cam was across the street from Allison, not next door. Are were sure which neighbor had the cam, or did 2 have them?

I KNOW the neighbors next door have cams. I don't know what's across the street or on the other side but I do intend to find out.

There are more than one surveillance camera. Check out this closeup from the leaked doc:

surveillance cameras wording in document.png

Note use of the word "cameras".
 
  • #512
:floorlaugh: That's a question for Bernina! LOL! :floorlaugh:

I'm not finding this to be a chuckling matter. In fact, I'm not chuckling. A young woman has been brutally murdered in her home. Naturally the most obvious suspects would be someone she knows or someone in her circle. But when the police have DNA evidence, and months have past without an arrest; then it's not unreasonable to look at a burglar/stalker/rapist theory.
 
  • #513
Blue beamer was identified in the warrant, was able to catch that from one of the stills from the news video, but who it belonged to was off the screen.

I wonder why they referred to that in the warrant. I have since found out it belonged to the BF.
 
  • #514
Ok, here's the camera pics with a point of reference: Red is the opening that goes to the entry where the door is. The blue circle is the camera and how it lines up with that exterior wall that cuts to the entry way........

AF camera 4.jpg Feb 2015

AF camera 5.jpg Feb 2015

AF camera 6.jpg 2013

The only thing different in the 2013 pic is the neighbor had a mature tree in front of the windows, but the wood siding is the same, paint is the same. They even have that ADT sign.

The news banner kind of breaks up the image of the house, but it's there.
 
  • #515
Ok, here's the camera pics with a point of reference: Red is the opening that goes to the entry where the door is. The blue circle is the camera and how it lines up with that exterior wall that cuts to the entry way........

View attachment 73466 Feb 2015

View attachment 73467 Feb 2015

View attachment 73468 2013

The only thing different in the 2013 pic is the neighbor had a mature tree in front of the windows, but the wood siding is the same, paint is the same. They even have that ADT sign.

The news banner kind of breaks up the image of the house, but it's there.

I see what you mean but I'm not sure you see what I mean. If you know what I mean.
 
  • #516
I wonder why they referred to that in the warrant. I have since found out it belonged to the BF.

First on scene, everything stays put and up goes the crime scene tape. Everything needs to be accounted for and everything at the crime scene investigated, so some slick defense attorney doesn't say, "Well, there was a blue beamer in front of the house the day she was found, why didn't you find out who's it was?" Or "Was the BF's car searched or did you just let him go on his merry way?"

8 weeks and no arrest.
 
  • #517
First on scene, everything stays put and up goes the crime scene tape. Everything needs to be accounted for and everything at the crime scene investigated, so some slick defense attorney doesn't say, "Well, there was a blue beamer in front of the house the day she was found, why didn't you find out who's it was?" Or "Was the BF's car searched or did you just let him go on his merry way?"

8 weeks and no arrest.

I suppose they wouldn't have been able to search the BFs car without a warrant, huh? Maybe that's why it was mentioned.
 
  • #518
I'm not finding this to be a chuckling matter. In fact, I'm not chuckling. A young woman has been brutally murdered in her home. Naturally the most obvious suspects would be someone she knows or someone in her circle. But when the police have DNA evidence, and months have past without an arrest; then it's not unreasonable to look at a burglar/stalker/rapist theory.

Miss D and I have been on thread together before so we might put an "inside joke" so to speak out there, but Miss D was in no way referring to AF's murder. I was hanging "outside of the box" on the other thread we were on so I believe the comment has a lot to do with that I get an idea and hold onto it like a dog with a bone. So the chuckle was for my stubbornness, NOT this tragedy. Sorry it came off that way.
 
  • #519
I suppose they wouldn't have been able to search the BFs car without a warrant, huh? Maybe that's why it was mentioned.

Exactly.
 
  • #520
I'm not finding this to be a chuckling matter. In fact, I'm not chuckling. A young woman has been brutally murdered in her home. Naturally the most obvious suspects would be someone she knows or someone in her circle. But when the police have DNA evidence, and months have past without an arrest; then it's not unreasonable to look at a burglar/stalker/rapist theory.

Miss D and I have been on thread together before so we might put an "inside joke" so to speak out there, but Miss D was in no way referring to AF's murder. I was hanging "outside of the box" on the other thread we were on so I believe the comment has a lot to do with that I get an idea and hold onto it like a dog with a bone. So the chuckle was for my stubbornness, NOT this tragedy. Sorry it came off that way.

Thank you Bernina! It hurts me more than I could ever put into words how such a bright and shining star like Allison had her life snuffed out in any way at all, much less such a horrible and brutal manner. I would never in a jillion trillion years make light or joke about something like that.

In spite of the fact that you and I often find ourselves in different camps (so to speak) I have always enjoyed your posts and theories and especially the interesting (Berninalike) way you put them out there.

The Websleuths site has made these smileys available for us to use, not as a way to disrespect the missing or the dead, but as a way for us to express ourselves and quite frankly, sometimes you gotta laugh to keep from crying.

My heart goes out to her family and friends. It hurts me and grieves me to think of their never ending pain.

I hope that we can put something together here that might help to solve her crime.

In the meantime....keep smiling and keep up the humour!

It does make it more bearable.

:moo:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
135
Guests online
3,294
Total visitors
3,429

Forum statistics

Threads
632,575
Messages
18,628,626
Members
243,198
Latest member
ghghhh13
Back
Top