Climbing over things or the suspect taking some sort of covered lower position could explain the wound, I'd not thought of that.
Though the prosecution and witnesses makes no mention of scrambling over obstacles, only of them running away.
Even with a low position, there is still that apparent sharply angled trajectory. That I think would still need a further explanation if he was as far away as stated when the bullets were fired. - I wonder, could it be that he fired at their feet rather than over their heads? A bullet deflecting off of something on the ground and up into the victim could also explain that angle. Also a far more reckless place to aim, so worth lying about.
There seems to be some
confusion on exactly where he was. The LE all seem to agree the shots were fired from near his porch and travelled a ,
80-100 yard distance through a wooded area. The witnesses mention him
coming out of the bushes and being something like 10ft away.
So did they approach far closer to the house than it seems? Was he not by the porch when they first encountered him or when the bullets were fired? Did he take potshots at a distant group or did they get relatively close as he first stated? Did the victim continue to run some distance before he fell?
I would really love to see photos of this location and the relative positions of the people involved. There is far too much up in the air to draw any real conclusions.