AZ - Gabriel Johnson, 8 months, 26 Dec 2009 - last seen in Texas - #8

[pghbrandi]

It is her site, wouldn't you delete messages that were rude, slanderous or unfavorable to you? Or would you just allow all your friends and family to see them?

I wouldn't be accepting over one thousand "friends" either so I don't see myself ever having that problem. BUT, if someone did post something on my page I didn't like, I WOULD answer them. I have nothing to hide.

 

[mum]

I read back on forensic astrology forum and it was written that maybe Gabriel would be dressed up like a girl. Just a thought.

 

[Bratlings]

I wouldn't be accepting over one thousand "friends" either so I don't see myself ever having that problem. BUT, if someone did post something on my page I didn't like, I WOULD answer them. I have nothing to hide.

I wouldn't do what she has done either but on the other hand just because she has done that does not mean she has opened her life up to being everyone's business. If she does not want to respond to something or she doesn't like someones comment it is her right to delete them or their comment. She is not running for President, and even Presidential hopefuls refuse information and delete comments on their websites... lol

 

[mamaeb]

WELCOME mamaeb! And go for you for sticking to your guns!

Thanks. I used to post here when the caylee case was happening but have moved and changed internet services so I lost that email.

I had a few other things to point out that may have already been discussed.


I noticed on TPS' page that in one picture her daughter is not in a carseat. In the other she is not even buckled in. This makes me wonder about if it really matters to them if baby Gabriel was in a carseat or not when he left Elizabeth.
http://www.facebook.com/album.php?aid=24112&id=1585061919#/photo.php?pid=426626&id=1585061919
http://hphotos-snc1.fbcdn.net/hs124.snc1/5328_1145906379577_1585061919_363697_1944391_n.jpg

 

[pghbrandi]

I wouldn't do what she has done either but on the other hand just because she has done that does not mean she has opened her life up to being everyone's business. If she does not want to respond to something or she doesn't like someones comment it is her right to delete them or their comment. She is not running for President, and even Presidential hopefuls refuse information and delete comments on their websites... lol

I agree with most of your quote. But. She is pushing her life for all of us to see. She is accepting people she doesn't know. She should be more careful of media attention and all of this new FB attention if she doesn't want to be confronted with negativity.

 

[Bratlings]

Thanks. I used to post here when the caylee case was happening but have moved and changed internet services so I lost that email.

I had a few other things to point out that may have already been discussed.


I noticed on TPS' page that in one picture her daughter is not in a carseat. In the other she is not even buckled in. This makes me wonder about if it really matters to them if baby Gabriel was in a carseat or not when he left Elizabeth.
http://www.facebook.com/album.php?aid=24112&id=1585061919#/photo.php?pid=426626&id=1585061919
http://hphotos-snc1.fbcdn.net/hs124.snc1/5328_1145906379577_1585061919_363697_1944391_n.jpg

Here is one where her daughter is in a carseat.

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?v=wall&ref=ts&id=1585061919#/photo.php?pid=450638&id=1585061919

 

[SusanB]

Unless you are Sheeba from Illinois, you won't get through to NG. That caller also gets in Mike Galanos and Jane V-M. She always sounds like she's had a few too many.:crazy:

 

[mamaeb]

Here is one where her daughter is in a carseat.

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?v=wall&ref=ts&id=1585061919#/photo.php?pid=450638&id=1585061919

yep, I have seen those but I was just pointing out that there are others where she is not. I am not sure of the girls age, but IMO she needs to be in a carseat or at least buckled in

 

[Kateyes]

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1001/13/ng.01.html

Last night I posted a comment about TS saying on the NG show that she went up to Elizabeth at the airport and asked her what she wanted to do with her baby. Another poster asked where did I get that story as it was inaccurate. I told her I heard TS say that on the NG show on 1/13/2010. Above is a link to the transcipt of the show for 1/13/2010, and below is a quote of TS from the transcript: 'TAMMI PETERS SMITH: I just knew the second I saw her, there is something wrong there. And I just immediately, What do you want to do with your baby?"

I cannot recall the username of the poster who asked me for that information, but I hope he/she is reading here and sees that I have posted the link for the transcript as I stated I would in my response last night.

Quoting my own post because I went back and looked. Bratlings, the link to NG show last evening on 1/13/2010 is above. As I stated last night, the quote is in the transcripts and the remainder of my post is pure speculation and MOO.

 

[SusanB]

How does TS explain her cousin's name on Gabriels birth certificate?

 

[~PrinceSSa~]

Tonight on HLN (on Mike Gelanos show) Jack said that the guy was chubby. Personally, I think the descriptions are a bunch of bull-dook, but that's just me. I don't believe EJ's story, and the descriptions are just too general. Would be nice to see a composite sketch.

What am I missing here? HOW does JACK know if the guy was chubby. Was he there also or was it HIM? ( we know they have a tan colour carseat) :waitasec:

 

[Bratlings]

I agree with most of your quote. But. She is pushing her life for all of us to see. She is accepting people she doesn't know. She should be more careful of media attention and all of this new FB attention if she doesn't want to be confronted with negativity.

I think if she really wants to convince people that she has done nothing wrong then why not just lay out all the facts as she knows them and answer direct questions? So clearly her site is not to disseminate truth, its to attempt to control what people think of her. It isnt working though and someone should tell her. Personally I dont like what I have seen, but it doesnt convince me that she really had any clue what EJ was planning to do with Gabriel in SA either beforehand or afterwards.

 

[Reiyn]

Well, that may be his story now, but just about 1 week ago tonight he was remembering things a little differently. Giving little demonstrations of how EJ was holding the baby away from her body (and saying they hold H's baby dolls even closer than that - which is weird, but then yeah, I can see them doing that), talking about how Tammi held the baby during almost the whole flight, etc. He's as big a liar as she is. JMO

I agree. I would never trust these two people.

 

[Baznme]

I wouldn't be accepting over one thousand "friends" either so I don't see myself ever having that problem. BUT, if someone did post something on my page I didn't like, I WOULD answer them. I have nothing to hide.

I would think she would not want to get into any lengthy conversations that started off with a rude comment. That "friend" already has their mind made up. Not that I'm taking her side, it's just common sense to me that she would'nt want to do that. IMO

 

[DairyGirl]

How does TS explain her cousin's name on Gabriels birth certificate?

Basically, either EJ overheard her talk about her cousin or she compared her cousins DUI record with LM's and took it upon herself to use his name or the paternity papers, without TPS's knowledge in spite of her driving her there and making 3 copies of those papers.

 

[Bratlings]

Quoting my own post because I went back and looked. Bratlings, the link to NG show last evening on 1/13/2010 is above. As I stated last night, the quote is in the transcripts and the remainder of my post is pure speculation and MOO.

I do understand that is what she said, but she left out the rest of the story that she has told countless times. She did not just literally walk up to EJ and say, "what are you going to do with your baby?" It is just normal when you tell a story over and over to start shortening it somewhat to get to the point and that is what she was doing in that quote.

 

[mamaeb]

I would think she would not want to get into any lengthy conversations that started off with a rude comment. That "friend" already has their mind made up. Not that I'm taking her side, it's just common sense to me that she would'nt want to do that. IMO

LOL. She used the word "" in a derogatory and ignorant way. I let her know it was insulting. I was as nice as I could be about it with still making my point. I don't really think the way I said it was rude. I think that if someone is using language like that it is because they are ignorant to how it can insult and hurt others.
Beyond that... I deleted the link and comment, not TPS.

 

[what about this?]

Unless you are Sheeba from Illinois, you won't get through to NG. That caller also gets in Mike Galanos and Jane V-M. She always sounds like she's had a few too many.:crazy:

LOL!! I thought the same thing!

 

[redfish]

I do understand that is what she said, but she left out the rest of the story that she has told countless times. She did not just literally walk up to EJ and say, "what are you going to do with your baby?" It is just normal when you tell a story over and over to start shortening it somewhat to get to the point.

Respectfully, since Tammy has told several different versions of this herself, how do you know which is the correct one. So, what is your point in correcting this poster in such a combative way? I am confused. You have put a fellow poster in an awkward position of defending herself against a quoted post!

 

[mamaeb]

Basically, either EJ overheard her talk about her cousin or she compared her cousins DUI record with LM's and took it upon herself to use his name or the paternity papers, without TPS's knowledge in spite of her driving her there and making 3 copies of those papers.

I think TPS had her do that so that the cousin could sign over rights to her with Elizabeth and so they could try and sneak around biodads dis-approval.