- Joined
- Jun 5, 2009
- Messages
- 3,229
- Reaction score
- 118
The first 911 caller was Sergio Junior! They thought the caller was a female, because of his young voice.
Did JVM state they thought the caller was female?
The first 911 caller was Sergio Junior! They thought the caller was a female, because of his young voice.
BBM.. For what purpose? I don't know but there are crazy people in this world.. So your guess, I supsect, would be as good as mine.. IMHO Neither of the parents seem to be too overly distraught over a child being missing.. I would be a basket case IF it were my child...JMHO
What are the reasons, for all you experts out there, that he would be removed from the kids but still be allowed to see Becky?
I am not an expert. I have a question.
If LE had somehow overheard Sergio speaking privately with Becky, could they have heard him suggest or threaten to do something foolish, like take the boys and go to live in Mexico? If Sergio said these things out of frustration with the media coverage or public opinion, he might have realized that he shouldn't have said it and really wouldn't do such a thing, but LE would still have to take his words seriously and move to protect the boys (and to cover their butts). Would a situation like this fit the LE description that Sergio himself is not a threat to the boys unless they are with him? :moo:
The police dispatch said to the responding officer that "the complainant will be the sister", after describing the missing child. (I wondered about that when I saw the playback transcription of the dispatch from the call.) JVM was clarifying why that was, as her producers were listening to the tapes.Did JVM state they thought the caller was female?
As i see it whomever did this is out to hurt Sergio!
We have no idea what this family might have been intobut they sure have remained pretty silent..I thought they were hiding from someone.
the home has a wall around it its like a prison.
Dogs,, i thought one was a watch dog and the other a pet!
Or he is the one responsible!
Very strange if ya ask me!
Akk JMO
You might be right. Even though we have not been told about phone or text message who is to say TPD doesn't have those?:twocents:
I think today took away what strand of patience I had left with HLN...will not be transcribing NG anymore...FWIW.
The police dispatch said to the responding officer that "the complainant will be the sister", after describing the missing child. I wondered about that when I saw the playback transcription of the dispatch from the call.
Press Conference - 5/14/12 @3:00 PM Tuscon Time
http://www.myspace.com/video/565006329/isabel-celis-press-conference-5-14-12-audio-only/108733030
BBM
There are lots of homes like this in AZ, MN, etc.
I think today took away what strand of patience I had left with HLN...will not be transcribing NG anymore...FWIW.
Above BBM. While IMO at this point its quite possibly unwise that they do not have an Atty.. it does however IMO lend more credence to their not being involved in their daughters disappearance.. jmo and I could be wrong for feeling that way but IMO. It certainly seems as tho if one were involved and LE has the heat turned up this high on them tthat if they had half a brain cell they'd be retaining a lawyer FOR ABSOLUTE CERTAIN!!! ..again jmo, tho!
Well you're the one who originally asked if this could be a hoax. You didn't specify what you meant by "this."
I'm not speculating, I'm inquiring what you think might be a hoax.
A hoax by the parents would mean that Isa is not really missing and since she's only 6 years old, someone would be taking care of her. Why parents would want LE, CPS, the FBI, and the general public invading their lives and separating the children from both parents if there were no crime is beyond my comprehension. They're not on a reality TV show. LE would have ascertained by now if there was a hoax. I don't see this as a possibility at all.