IMO only.
I have concerns with how the "abduction" was first communicated as if it was already known for sure this is what occurred. I realize it is an obvious deduction to make, but I have concerns that the dad may have forced a certain theory onto the son and everyone else because lets take a look at the son's very first comment on the 911 call below....
"My sister's gone uh, someone broke in and grabbed her"
Now, let's take a look at the dad's very first comment on his 911 call....
"I believe she was abducted from our house"
Now, let us recall the first televised interview with the dad where he mentions something about "what are your demands"
So, as we summarize all of this, I have to make an assumption that he was the one that made the declaration to the son that this is what has occurred here, and this is the situation.
Again, it is an obvious assumption to make, but let us try to think how each one of us would have communicated if we woke up and saw the situation. The only thing that I can think of that I would be saying is "she is missing and that it appears someone may have broke in and may have took her". I dont think I would take the leap to affirmitively announce that it was definitetly an abduction or that someone grabbed her.
The fact that the son said someone "grabbed her" really bothers me, as if someone used those words to him prior to him making the call (OR) if he maybe even saw something as it was happening.
This just bothers me, and it probably doesn't help anything, but I found it very concerning when thinking about all the statements together, and thinking about those very first statements on the 911 call before much was known by anyone.
Something about this just doesn't feel right, especially, as we now hear of prior CPS involvement.
I am praying for that poor child.
