ExpectingUnicorns
. . . only the pure of heart can see.
- Joined
- Sep 29, 2008
- Messages
- 4,617
- Reaction score
- 3,229
G'night all. Wish Isa would return with the sunlight in the morning.
fftobed: Keep a light on for her. :candle:

Well, my guess is that JM has not left town with funds and testing due, but I could be wrong...
The reason for these questions about where he is that he was only on the news one day?
:waitasec:
IDK
I still don't see any type of evidence that points his direction
The Los Zetas are not Colombian. They are Sinoloa-based (state in Mexico). As is/was the Gulf cartel and numerous others. These are the cartels who benefited from the fiasco called Fast and Furious.
ETA: but yes, you are correct. If we were talking about a missing child in Chinatown, NYC, we'd inevitably be discussing the Chinese gangs.
Well, my guess is that JM has not left town with funds and testing due, but I could be wrong...
The reason for these questions about his location are due to the fact that he was only on the news one day since Isa went missing?
:waitasec:
IDK
I still don't see any type of evidence that points his direction
IDK, I always thought if a person had a court date they show up or an Attorney does so. I had no idea the system is automated. Learn something new everyday here.
:floorlaugh: Oy!
Didn't the neighbor say that he knocked on her door at 8:00 looking for Isa? I think that initially made people question how he got there so quickly. I'm not sure if she ever retracted that statement.
I do not doubt you JQP...I said I was learning here. That being said, court appointments/memos by automation is a bit disturbing...to me. jmoITS NOT A COURT DATE its just a memo on the case file that he was due for his UA .. I only know what it is because my wife works for the court system and I have worked with narcotics taskforce.
:floorlaugh:OT, this is kind of ridiculous, but I was telling my husband something tonight about coffee, of all things, why I had to go out at night to Dunkin Donuts to buy coffee grounds, since I am addicted to it, and then finished with "well, it is just my opinion." And worse, I almost just said "JMO."
I'm trying to type and keep up at the same time and it's nearly impossible. Forgive me if I've missed something. I know I'm referencing a post from a few pages ago.
A recent post from Gliving referenced an Arizona Daily star article where Sgt. Hawke discussed previous TPD calls.
Hawke said "They're very minimal. When I do a check of the residence, there virtually is no contact there prior to most recently"
http://azstarnet.com/news/local/crim...3ea7b14ee.html
This may not be a "dead horse" since there are so many earlier posts on whether LE has really said that the prior CPS visit was MINOR.
When I listened to last Thursday's media briefing (MAY 17), I thought that the discussion of the previous calls to the Celis home could lead to confusion. Hawke was actually asked several different questions (some about CPS and some about TPD visits).
This is from memory and I'm paraphrasing but it is supported by the Star article. (Is it OK to paraphrase, if I refer to the statements in a specific press briefing?) I'm looking for a FULL transcript and link for that briefing, maybe you already have it.
From what I remember, when asked about the December CPS call, Hawke admitted that they knew about it and gave the regular TPD response about not commenting on CPS cases. Then she referred the questioner to the CPS spokesperson. As usual, she wouldn't give any additional information on the CPS involvement and that was the end of the CPS answers.
Later in the briefing, I believe she was asked about previous TPD calls to the house and she admitted that there had been calls in the past. The questioner tried to find out when. She said she didn't even know if the Celis family lived there then. The questioner said Celis had owned home for 5 years, and tried to find out the specific time frame of the calls. She didn't give a direct answer.
Then to end that line of questioning, I think she basically summarized by saying that the calls were MINOR and minimal in nature . She appeared to be talking only about the TPD calls, she had already said she would NOT comment on CPS calls. The TPD calls could even be referring to the dog citations and therefore would not involve Isa.
If I understood correctly, she said no comment on CPS calls and that the TPD calls were Minor (minimal). Soon after this briefing, media and commentors were saying that LE had said that the December CPS call was MINOR.
Since LE has been so careful to parse their words in this case, it doesn't seem likely that they told certain media sources that the CPS call was MINOR after the briefing. They have steadfastly refused to comment on any CPS matter in the past.
IMO, the media listened to the briefing, didn't distinguish between CPS and TPD calls, and then ran with the story.
Can anyone help me find either the full video or full transcript of the 5/17 briefing? I'm trying to refresh my memory. I thought a full transcript would be easy to find.
Several here have used the Today show as the source for the report that the prior CPS call was minor. I usually go to KVOA for video of past press briefings, but the now the 5/17 video has been shortened to include only the explanation of abduction, not the question/answer portion.
If the calls that were "MINOR and NOT involving Isabel" really referred to TPD calls and not CPS, then I think we're basing opinions on mistaken reporting. And we're back to knowing nothing about the extent of previous or current CPS involvement. (which I think is the way LE and CPS want it left for now.)
I do not doubt you JQP...I said I was learning here. That being said, court appointments/memos by automation is a bit disturbing...to me. jmo
Is it illegal to leave a 14 yr old in charge of a 10 and 6 yr old sibling? I used to PAY my 14 yr old to babysit when we went out.
I think the point of the post , FrayedKnot, was that it was not the CPS calls that Hawke called "minor" but the other TPD calls to the house that were minor.
HTH
I think the point of the post , FrayedKnot, was that it was not the CPS calls that Hawke called "minor" but the other TPD calls to the house that were minor.
HTH
So do I have this right??
CPS visited the house at least once in December of last year.
Police have been called to the house more than once for minor issues.
Isabel has been abducted from the home.
Sergio has agreed to no contact with his other children at the request of CPS.
Seems like a lot of things going on to me. JMHO.
So do I have this right??
CPS visited the house at least once in December of last year.
Police have been called to the house more than once for minor issues.
Isabel has been abducted from the home.
Sergio has agreed to no contact with his other children at the request of CPS.
Seems like a lot of things going on to me. JMHO.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.