I'm not sure looking at the docket. Beats me. Doesn't say the breed of dog.
TC4-76 ANIMAL-NO CURRENT VACCINATION
TC4-81 ANIMAL-NO CURRENT LICENSE
TC4-76 ANIMAL-NO CURRENT VACCINATION
http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/courts/QDPS/Search/CitySearch.aspx
Okay, There are two dockets. One case number ends in 20 and the other in 22.
The X numbers are citation numbers, so it appears on the 13th two different citations were written.
Ending in case number 20:
1 / 1 A X0067820 4/13/2012 TC4-76 ANIMAL-NO CURRENT VACCINATION
2 / 1 B X0067820 4/13/2012 TC4-81 ANIMAL-NO CURRENT LICENSE
3 / 1 C X0067820 4/13/2012 TC4-76 ANIMAL-NO CURRENT VACCINATION
Ending in case number 22 :
1 / 1 A X0067819 4/13/2012 TC4-97 ANIMAL-DOG RUNNING AT LARGE
2 / 1 B X0067819 4/13/2012 TC4-81 ANIMAL-NO CURRENT LICENSE
3 / 1 C X0067819 4/13/2012 TC4-76 ANIMAL-NO CURRENT VACCINATION
4 / 1 D X0067819 4/13/2012 TC4-97 ANIMAL-DOG RUNNING AT LARGE
5 / 1 E X0067819 4/13/2012 TC4-81 ANIMAL-NO CURRENT LICENSE
Both cases state "COMPANION FILE EXISTS"
There are three no currrent vaccinations, three no current license, and two dog running at large.
Since there were two running at large charges, I'd guess two larger backyard dogs got loose. The animal control perhaps demanded to see the paperwork on the little dog we see in the pictures, who did not get loose?
The arraignment is set for Thursday.