That was a biggie for the jurors.She is so transparent, cutting off Nancy Jo when talking about Charles's love for JJ. So repugnant.
imo
That was a biggie for the jurors.She is so transparent, cutting off Nancy Jo when talking about Charles's love for JJ. So repugnant.
I missed this:
It was my understanding that Nancy Jo found out Charles was dead when the kids' disappearance hit the news.I missed this:
Did Nancy Jo not know that CV had been killed until 5 months later or did she know and for whatever reason waited the 5 months to offer her condolences and speak about having had dinner with him the night before?
Not that it matters in the scheme of things but it bothered me when NJ answered some questions asked her by LVD with "sure" instead of a "yes" or "correct".
imo
Adam Cox and Kay Woodcock to testify tomorrow.
Judge Beresky's hair style is cool and serves him well.
Exactly!It was my understanding that Nancy Jo found out Charles was dead when the kids' disappearance hit the news.
Thank you.Someone asked earlier about when did NJH find out about Charles's death? I found this:
Snipped:
"Hancock explained that the following morning after the date, she had texted Charles to ask how his morning went but received no response. She attempted to call Charles a few hours later but didn’t get a callback.
“I was puzzled how I had misread what I had thought had been a good date that he would not even take the courtesy to reply. I wondered why but just figured that was what his decision was,” Hancock said.
"She then said she didn’t know that Charles had been shot and killed until it was on TV. That’s when she saw his photo and his date of death."
![]()
WATCH: Lori Vallow Daybell grills witness who dated estranged husband
Wednesday's trial continued with a tense back-and-forth exchange between Lori Vallow and the woman who went on a date with Charles Vallow the night before his death.www.azfamily.com
The information introduced in the opening statement will be presented gradually over several weeks. The most important facts will be repeated. Also, in Arizona the jury is allowed to ask questions, which is a bonus.I cannot fathom being on this jury, especially if the jurors said they were not familiar with the news coverage of this case. Having to understand all the characters, their relationship/how they knew each other, whether someone was labeled dark or light and on & on. I tried watching some of the trial, but mostly have hit the highlights as I find it almost unwatchable.