Really? Makes no difference to you? Seriously? Why the change of tune?
I've said all along the kid needs intensive residential treatment, all along you've argued and said the kid wasn't a danger and would/should stay with his mother.
The kid's clearly and obviously severely disturbed and a danger. Do you think both shrinks would recommend RTC in another state because he isn't a danger? No, the level of this child's need is great and they felt his needs would be best met by a specialized treatment program, one of the best, out of state.
I want the mother and kid to be satisfied with the deal, if they are... I am.
The boy was and still is with his mother, over a year since this happened.
So therefore, he has not and will not be a danger to the community... which has been shown to most observant people.
There you go again with your webpsychiatry 'severely disturbed and a danger'
You should be ashamed to post something like that... really!
:hand: :slap: You HAVE NO IDEA what the shrinks recommended, so you also have NO IDEA what the proper treatment should/will be. Out of state or in state should not make any difference at all in the matter... and why would a different state be relevent to if he was a danger or not? Nothing you have predicted or stated as your opinion has come to be, so the same rhetoric of a danger to society (yada yada) about a boy which has been living with his mom for over a year keeps being repeated over and over. Amazing.