Sorry Thumbtack. I was not ever implying that YOU were gullible AT ALL.
I probably have not read every news article about this case. Was it said that the whole and only reason she hired a PI was concerns about sexual infidelity, and do you know who said this? And, yes, if she cancelled the PI solely because she was afraid of his anger, I fear she just got herself killed by someone she should have known to stay far away from. So I agree with you there.
In both my work AND personal life, I have known COMPLETELY unsuspecting people who only learned AFTER marriage of the very well hidden crimes and frauds of their COMPLETELY trusted partners. So I don't put much weight on the "blind trusting love" concept.
One was able to get an annulment due to fraud, but several others were not that lucky. And here at Websleuths, we see everyday that TRUSTING a partner is no guarantee that they are trust WORTHY.
My husband was surprised but completely open to a premarital "forensic" checkup, which I felt was necessary because I had children, was giving up a very nice career to move across country to marry him, and we had only known each other a little less than a year. Dating longer long distance would NOT have satisfied my need to be SURE he was not a sex offender, felon, or in deep financial distress that he might be withholding.
Several of my friends lived to wish they HAD done this before their lives were nearly destroyed. THEY trusted absolutely and got burned badly; I doubted and needed to be SURE and have had 17 years of bliss with the most wonderful man in the world.
And btw, if he had balked at having his history looked into, that would have been a giant red flag for me. Why mind if one has nothing to hide?