Bankrupt Casey Anthony interviewed by KPHO CBS in Phoenix #2

[ThinkTank]

CM doesn't have anything better to do??

In my own opinion -- That's his "girl" and he has to be at the depo to protect her "story", because he only gets PAID, if there is a "story" left to sell, after the depo.

 

[ThinkTank]

I think it's a typo - the article talks about items of Charles Manson selling on the Murderabilia site, then later it mentions a 'Mason' greeting card selling for $170.....

I agree there is a typo in the murderabilia articles...

We were talking about Cheney Mason attending her deposition, in the Zenaida case, and CM having nothing better to do.

 

[RR0004]

I think it's a typo - the article talks about items of Charles Manson selling on the Murderabilia site, then later it mentions a 'Mason' greeting card selling for $170.....

LOL...no Cheney Mason appeared for "you know who"...or at least, I think that's what was implied in TT's post.

 

[RR0004]

In my own opinion -- That's his "girl" and he has to be at the depo to protect her "story", because he only gets PAID, if there is a "story" left to sell, after the depo.

There's something weirdly perverse in all that, IMO.

 

[Victoria2]

I don't get it - what are these hearings all about- they have a meeting and all they do is schedule another meeting? Good thing it's nothing important! :banghead:

This all seems to be moving at the same pace as molasses in January. If nothing else I take heart that Casey remains pinned like a bug to a mount. Unable to move on as she is so want to do in any direction and there is a little something in that.

 

[Intermezzo]

In my own opinion -- That's his "girl" and he has to be at the depo to protect her "story", because he only gets PAID, if there is a "story" left to sell, after the depo.

Why would a Criminal Defense Attorney feel the need to attend a Bankruptcy Depo when she has a Bankruptcy attorney?
Also, he wants to be notified of further court appearances and wants to be notified/copied about future hearings and pleadings
I, agree...he's attending to protect something.

 

[ZsaZsa]

LOL...no Cheney Mason appeared for "you know who"...or at least, I think that's what was implied in TT's post.

Yes, I am confused.....:floorlaugh: I was thinking of the Murderabilia article and made the leap when I saw 'Mason'...

 

[ThinkTank]

LOL...no Cheney Mason appeared for "you know who"...or at least, I think that's what was implied in TT's post.

Cheney Mason filed a "Notice of Appearance", which means he is on board now as one of her attorneys in the bankruptcy case, but ONLY for the limited time of the deposition, when it takes place later this month.

 

[RR0004]

Cheney Mason filed a "Notice of Appearance", which means he is on board now as one of her attorneys in the bankruptcy case, but ONLY for the limited time of the deposition, when it takes place later this month.

Still worried she may implicate herself...and her team? Obviously, notwithstanding any criminal culpability thanks to the Pinellas 12.

 

[CarolinaMoon]

Long time, no comment, but I've been keeping up by reading your wonderful posts.

IMHO, the Murderabilia site making a "killing" off of Casey's "stuff" sold by the A's at flea market prices is both appalling and ironic.

I'm sure Cindy is :banghead::banghead::banghead: reading about the prices the site is asking or getting (I didn't go there.) and thinking, "Why didn't I think about that?" :floorlaugh:

 

[watcher9]

Still worried she may implicate herself...and her team? Obviously, notwithstanding any criminal culpability thanks to the Pinellas 12.

Why is he continuing to be her knight in shining armor? Is he going to be there to protect her from saying something that could prove her guilt and make her attorneys look like fools? I just can't figure out why he would be worried because even if she did say something, she couldn't be retried by the state because of the double jeopardy rule. At this point I don't know that even the government would bother to go after her for something unless it's the IRS? And I would hope that there is not any big bucks out there for her any longer.

 

[watcher9]

Long time, no comment, but I've been keeping up by reading your wonderful posts.

IMHO, the Murderabilia site making a "killing" off of Casey's "stuff" sold by the A's at flea market prices is both appalling and ironic.

I'm sure Cindy is :banghead::banghead::banghead: reading about the prices the site is asking or getting (I didn't go there.) and thinking, "Why didn't I think about that?" :floorlaugh:

Has it been confirmed that they have actually sold some of her stuff? Or, is this just a marketing strategy to make buyers think it's a hot item because it's priced so high?

i agree that Cindy is probably upset. Do we know how much Cindy originally sold the stuff for? I wonder if she had a note on them verifying their authenticity?

 

[ThinkTank]

ZENAIDA and KRONK moving forward to Trial !!

RULINGS FROM HEARING on JANUARY 14, 2014

- ZENAIDA
- Next Hearing/trial on April 29, 2014 at 1:30pm
- Summary Judgment Motions due by March 21, 2014
- Casey will have 21 days to Respond
- Will be heard same date and time

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B7DjeAMt_BpIdldrWG1uYTFsOWM/edit?usp=sharing

---------------------------------------

- KRONK
- Next Hearing/trial on September 30, 2014 at 1:30pm
- Summary Judgment Motions due by August 22, 2014
- Casey will have 21 days to Respond
- Will be heard same date and time
- Casey's Request to DISMISS Kronk's Complaint, in her
ANSWER is DENIED

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B7DjeAMt_BpIYzN1QmVPenNtWWM/edit?usp=sharing

 

[watcher9]

ZENAIDA and KRONK moving forward to Trial !!

RULINGS FROM HEARING on JANUARY 14, 2014

- ZENAIDA
- Next Hearing/trial on April 29, 2014 at 1:30pm
- Summary Judgment Motions due by March 21, 2014
- Casey will have 21 days to Respond
- Will be heard same date and time

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B7DjeAMt_BpIdldrWG1uYTFsOWM/edit?usp=sharing

---------------------------------------

- KRONK
- Next Hearing/trial on September 30, 2014 at 1:30pm
- Summary Judgment Motions due by August 22, 2014
- Casey will have 21 days to Respond
- Will be heard same date and time
- Casey's Request to DISMISS Kronk's Complaint, in her
ANSWER is DENIED

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B7DjeAMt_BpIYzN1QmVPenNtWWM/edit?usp=sharing

I love it!
She was DENIED once again!
Not only that, Kronk now has her tied up til October!
Is she going to have to stay hidden for the year?
LOL
:loveyou::loveyou:
:floorlaugh::floorlaugh:

 

[ThinkTank]

CASEY ANTHONY DEPOSITION in ZENAIDA CASE
January 23, 2014 at 1:30pm

Cheney Mason filed a Notice January 14, 2014, so he can be present at the deposition of Casey Anthony, by Zenaida's attorney.

Notice of Limited Appearance on behalf of the Debtor(s) in the above-captioned case for the sole purpose of attending the hearing regarding the Debtor/Defendant Deposition scheduled for January 23, 2014 at 1:30 p.m.
(NO HEARING, DEPOSITION ONLY)
Filed by J Cheney Mason on behalf of Defendant Casey Marie Anthony. (Mason, J) (Entered: 01/14/2014)

https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B7DjeAMt_BpIRG9Bd09ZeGtqNzQ/edit?pli=1

-------------------------------------------
Erin Maloney
@ErinOnTV
Bay News 9 Reporter in Tampa
http://baynews9.com/content/news/baynews9/news/about/bios/erin-maloney.html

This Reporter was on Twitter and accidentally someone the location was "Tampa", but was supposed to say "Pasco". Erin Maloney had been at the Casey Anthony Hearing on January 14, 2014, in Tampa -- so accidentally "slipped out" her mouth the city of "Tampa" instead of "Pasco" for the other thing [nothing "slipped out" about Casey Anthony deposition].

This reporter has talked to Casey Anthony's attorney David Schrader, about the deposition of Casey Anthony, set for January 23, 2014, and in a "secret place".

Erin Maloney @ErinOnTV 14 Jan 2014
@ElaineTBO it wouldn't. I've been in federal court all morning for Casey Anthony so Tampa slipped out! That was a snooze btw

Info Seeker @Inquizzativ 21h Jan 14, 2014
@ErinOnTV @ElaineTBO #CASEYANTHONY deposition in Zenaida case set for Jan 23, 2014

Erin Maloney @ErinOnTV 20h Jan 14, 2014
@Inquizzativ yes-- Anthony's attorney told me he hopes case will be over in 3 months. Deposition will be in "secret" place.

 

[chefmom]

Why is he continuing to be her knight in shining armor? Is he going to be there to protect her from saying something that could prove her guilt and make her attorneys look like fools? I just can't figure out why he would be worried because even if she did say something, she couldn't be retried by the state because of the double jeopardy rule. At this point I don't know that even the government would bother to go after her for something unless it's the IRS? And I would hope that there is not any big bucks out there for her any longer.

Perhaps he is afraid she may lie about him and JB. She might get angry and go off, claiming that she never told them to say the things they said and that it was their idea to implicate RK. (Which I feel may be true.) IMO, CM knows just how much skirting of the law that he & JB did in order to defend KC, and he may be afraid of it coming out. All moo.

 

[ThinkTank]

The deposition of Casey Anthony by Zenaida's attorney Scott Shuker, is set for January 23, 2014. Zenaida's attorney will ask about Casey's accusations against Zenaida Gonzalez.

Roy Kronk is not involved in this deposition. His case is separate.

Here is Zenaida's attorneys Motion to take the deposition, which was filed early in the bankruptcy case - March 12, 2013.
Casey Anthony was asked questions in the Meeting of the Creditors on March 4, 2013 but did not answer a lot of them.

MOTION OF ZENAIDA GONZALEZ FOR ORDER AN DIRECTING EXAMINATION OF CASEY MARIE ANTHONY PURSUANT TO BANKRUPTCY RULE 2004
Filed March 12, 2013

https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B7DjeAMt_BpIR0NHaHU0Vi1GbGc/edit?pli=1


March 12, 2013

She would not say exactly which attorneys gave her money from donors and how much money.

She would not name the "friends" who give her unspecified financial support.

She did not disclose "certain additional assets" as she said she would amend her bankruptcy filing.

Zenaida's attorney believes that Zenaida's claim is NOT "disputed" and is valid and enforceable, and qualifies as an exception to bankruptcy discharge rules.

They want to discover the "full extent of Debtor's income and prospects for future income". They want to complete an "investigation into Debtor and her assets".

The examination "may relate to the acts, conduct, or property of the Debtor, or to any matter that may affect the administration of the Debtor's estate, and to request documents be produced.

--------------------------------------------------------------------

http://www.wftv.com/news/news/local/motion-could-force-casey-anthony-answer-questions-/nWpfy/

Posted: 6:01 a.m. Tuesday, March 12, 2013
Motion could force Casey Anthony to answer questions under oath

excerpts:

ORANGE COUNTY, Fla. —
The bankruptcy attorney for Zenaida Gonzalez told Eyewitness News he will file a motion in federal court on Tuesday to force Casey Anthony answer questions under oath.

Scott Shuker said if the motion is granted, he wants to ask Casey where she gets her money, what commercial interest she has in her story, and how she picked the name Zenaida Gonzalez for her mystery nanny.

-------------------------------

http://www.[link removed]/950155/casey-anthony-must-testify-about-caylees-disappearance/

Posted: September 14, 2013
Casey Anthony Must Testify About Caylee’s Disappearance

excerpts:

Casey Anthony will finally be forced to answer to a court about the disappearance of her daughter Caylee.

When the case goes to trial next month, Casey will be forced to answer questions about Caylee’s death, said Gonzalez’s attorney Matt Morgan.

“We believe that it’s not because it was an intentional act and the judge will make a final decision,” said Morgan. “We hope it’s going to reveal the truth of what happened and how Zenaida got drug into the circus in the first place.”

 

[watcher9]

Thank you again ThinkTank for bringing this info and links to the forefront as we await the deposition next week, actually one week from today.

 

[ThinkTank]

Judge Munyon, in 2011, in the Zenaida civil suit, SEALED only the VIDEO of the October 8, 2011 Deposition of Casey Anthony in disguise – but allowed the TRANSCRIPT to be released to the public.

She invoked the 5th SIXTY (60) times!

http://articles.orlandosentinel.com...ney-charles-greene-zenaida-fernandez-gonzalez

Judge seals Casey Anthony’s video deposition
A transcript of the videotaped deposition shows Anthony invoked her Fifth Amendment right.
October 31, 2011|By Bianca Prieto, Orlando Sentinel

excerpts:

Casey Anthony’s recent videotaped deposition in the civil case against her will not be made public, a judge ruled Monday.

“While the transcript will provide the public with the entire record of the deposition and permit the appropriate public scrutiny of these court proceedings, disclosure of the video, with its ready ability to be uploaded to the Internet or elsewhere will unfairly and unjustly taint any potential jury pool against the defendant.”

The 58-page transcript of the deposition was released Monday afternoon.

Attorney John Morgan said that in the Oct. 8 deposition, Anthony was “recognizable” in the video, but she appeared to wear a wig, may “have had some work done” and wore a Phillies cap along with large “Jackie O. sunglasses.”

Munyon’s ruling states the video will remain sealed unless it’s accepted as evidence in open court or unless the court decides to reverse the ruling.

Anthony’s legal team wanted both the video and the transcript sealed.

———————————————————————

http://www.cnn.com/2011/11/01/justice/florida-casey-anthony/

Casey Anthony takes Fifth 60 times in civil suit deposition
By Ashley Hayes, CNN
updated 5:40 AM EDT, Wed November 2, 2011

(CNN) — Attorneys representing Casey Anthony invoked her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination 60 times during a deposition given in a civil suit against her, according to a transcript of the proceedings.

In addition, Anthony’s attorney Charles Greene asserted he would also invoke the Fifth Amendment on her behalf if questioning delved into the 2008 death of her 2-year-old daughter, Caylee.

However, Greene did not permit her to answer questions including whether she had ever met Gonzalez; whether a person named Zenaida was ever a nanny to Caylee; or whether defense attorney Jose Baez’s assertion during Anthony’s criminal trial, that Zenaida Gonzalez was one of Anthony’s “imaginary friends,” was true.

She also was not allowed to answer questions about whether she considered herself a good mother to Caylee; the last day she saw the 2-year-old alive; and whether she drowned in the Anthonys’ pool in June 2008, as the defense claimed during Anthony’s criminal trial.

Asked why he was invoking Anthony's right against self-incrimination, Greene said, according to the transcript, "I need not explain our factual basis other than to tell you that it could tend to incriminate and provide a link in the chain of evidence that could be used against (Anthony)."

 

[ZsaZsa]

Judge Munyon, in 2011, in the Zenaida civil suit, SEALED only the VIDEO of the October 8, 2011 Deposition of Casey Anthony in disguise – but allowed the TRANSCRIPT to be released to the public.

She invoked the 5th SIXTY (60) times!

http://articles.orlandosentinel.com...ney-charles-greene-zenaida-fernandez-gonzalez

Judge seals Casey Anthony’s video deposition
A transcript of the videotaped deposition shows Anthony invoked her Fifth Amendment right.
October 31, 2011|By Bianca Prieto, Orlando Sentinel

excerpts:

Casey Anthony’s recent videotaped deposition in the civil case against her will not be made public, a judge ruled Monday.

“While the transcript will provide the public with the entire record of the deposition and permit the appropriate public scrutiny of these court proceedings, disclosure of the video, with its ready ability to be uploaded to the Internet or elsewhere will unfairly and unjustly taint any potential jury pool against the defendant.”

The 58-page transcript of the deposition was released Monday afternoon.

Attorney John Morgan said that in the Oct. 8 deposition, Anthony was “recognizable” in the video, but she appeared to wear a wig, may “have had some work done” and wore a Phillies cap along with large “Jackie O. sunglasses.”

Munyon’s ruling states the video will remain sealed unless it’s accepted as evidence in open court or unless the court decides to reverse the ruling.

Anthony’s legal team wanted both the video and the transcript sealed.

———————————————————————

http://www.cnn.com/2011/11/01/justice/florida-casey-anthony/

Casey Anthony takes Fifth 60 times in civil suit deposition
By Ashley Hayes, CNN
updated 5:40 AM EDT, Wed November 2, 2011

(CNN) — Attorneys representing Casey Anthony invoked her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination 60 times during a deposition given in a civil suit against her, according to a transcript of the proceedings.

In addition, Anthony’s attorney Charles Greene asserted he would also invoke the Fifth Amendment on her behalf if questioning delved into the 2008 death of her 2-year-old daughter, Caylee.

However, Greene did not permit her to answer questions including whether she had ever met Gonzalez; whether a person named Zenaida was ever a nanny to Caylee; or whether defense attorney Jose Baez’s assertion during Anthony’s criminal trial, that Zenaida Gonzalez was one of Anthony’s “imaginary friends,” was true.

She also was not allowed to answer questions about whether she considered herself a good mother to Caylee; the last day she saw the 2-year-old alive; and whether she drowned in the Anthonys’ pool in June 2008, as the defense claimed during Anthony’s criminal trial.

Asked why he was invoking Anthony's right against self-incrimination, Greene said, according to the transcript, "I need not explain our factual basis other than to tell you that it could tend to incriminate and provide a link in the chain of evidence that could be used against (Anthony)."

That last sentence says it all! They know she murdered Caylee .

Do you think there's a mistake in the date of this article- it says Oct 2011 and talks about her being found not guilty "earlier this year".....?