Bankrupt Casey Anthony interviewed by KPHO CBS in Phoenix #2

[Jomo]

I'm not expecting the deposition to actually happen. Wasn't there some sort of comment from one of her lawyers say that she would leave the state or country before she would testify to anything?

I wonder what moves she is going to make to avoid the deposition process. She will certainly try to buy more time, so I'm not holding my breath for October 9th.

 

[ThinkTank]

Agreed Motion to Continue/Reschedule On Pretrial Conference
Filed by Peter D. Russin on behalf of Plaintiff Texas Equusearch Mounted Search and Recovery
(Entered: 09/13/2013)

https://docs.google.com/file/d/0BwEDmRAkTopSdzlyY21wZzdFRmc/edit?usp=sharing

May 3, 2013 – TES filed Complaint
May 14, 2013 – Court set Pre-Trial Conference for July 2, 2013 at 10:30am
June 3, 2013 – Casey filed Motion to Dismiss TES’ Complaint
July 2, 2013 – HEARING held – Court moved Hearing to Sept 17, 2013 at 2:00pm

Page 2 – “The parties have come to a consensual resolution of the Plaintiff’s claims [TES] against the Debtor [Casey Anthony], including the Plaintiff’s [TES] unsecured proof of claim number 5 filed in the Debtor’s [Casey Anthony] bankruptcy estate, and are in the process of finalizing and executing the settlement agreement. The extension requested herein will allow the parties to do so, and as such, good cause exists to grant such relief.”

Plaintiff [TES] requests the Court continue the Pretrial Conference for sixty (60) days in accordance with the Court’s availability, or to such other date as may be deemed appropriate by the Court.

“Undersigned counsel [Peter Russin for TES] has conferred with the Debtor’s counsel [David Schrader, Debra Ferwerda, and Charles Greene, for Casey Anthony] concerning the requested continuance, and the Debtor’s counsel informed undersigned counsel that the Debtor [Casey Anthony] agrees with the relief requested herein.”

 

[?noanswer]

Agreed Motion to Continue/Reschedule On Pretrial Conference
Filed by Peter D. Russin on behalf of Plaintiff Texas Equusearch Mounted Search and Recovery
(Entered: 09/13/2013)

https://docs.google.com/file/d/0BwEDmRAkTopSdzlyY21wZzdFRmc/edit?usp=sharing

May 3, 2013 – TES filed Complaint
May 14, 2013 – Court set Pre-Trial Conference for July 2, 2013 at 10:30am
June 3, 2013 – Casey filed Motion to Dismiss TES’ Complaint
July 2, 2013 – HEARING held – Court moved Hearing to Sept 17, 2013 at 2:00pm

Page 2 – “The parties have come to a consensual resolution of the Plaintiff’s claims [TES] against the Debtor [Casey Anthony], including the Plaintiff’s [TES] unsecured proof of claim number 5 filed in the Debtor’s [Casey Anthony] bankruptcy estate, and are in the process of finalizing and executing the settlement agreement. The extension requested herein will allow the parties to do so, and as such, good cause exists to grant such relief.”

Plaintiff [TES] requests the Court continue the Pretrial Conference for sixty (60) days in accordance with the Court’s availability, or to such other date as may be deemed appropriate by the Court.

“Undersigned counsel [Peter Russin for TES] has conferred with the Debtor’s counsel [David Schrader, Debra Ferwerda, and Charles Greene, for Casey Anthony] concerning the requested continuance, and the Debtor’s counsel informed undersigned counsel that the Debtor [Casey Anthony] agrees with the relief requested herein.”

???? Are they agreeing to do more talking or did they agree to a monetary settlement?

JMO

 

[ThinkTank]

???? Are they agreeing to do more talking or did they agree to a monetary settlement?

JMO

They already agreed to a monetary settlement now they are just finalizing the settlement, which includes the Claim that TES filed which was exceeding $ 100,000.

 

[?noanswer]

They already agreed to a monetary settlement now they are just finalizing the settlement, which includes the Claim that TES filed which was exceeding $ 100,000.

Is this coming from what was left of the $25,000 after the Admin fees or did CA come up with more money?

JMO

 

[Sammiejam]

Shoot. I am so confused about all of it. One thing I am not confused about though! I still loathe and detest her and her crew of goons and PRAY every day for some kind of justice!

 

[Jomo]

I suspect that her "benefactor" is just trying to make it all go away now. If he is that rich, what is a few hundred thousand dollars anyways?

 

[ThinkTank]

Is this coming from what was left of the $25,000 after the Admin fees or did CA come up with more money?

JMO

The document that TES filed yesterday does not say how much money FCA will pay in the settlement agreement. It only asks for (60) more days to finalize the paperwork on the settlement that they have already agreed to.

Whatever the settlement amount -- the question still remains -- where is she getting the money to settle with TES?

The $ 25,000 the bankruptcy Trustee is getting so she can keep the rights to her story, is a separate issue from TES' settlement.

 

[watcher9]

Agreed Motion to Continue/Reschedule On Pretrial Conference
Filed by Peter D. Russin on behalf of Plaintiff Texas Equusearch Mounted Search and Recovery
(Entered: 09/13/2013)

https://docs.google.com/file/d/0BwEDmRAkTopSdzlyY21wZzdFRmc/edit?usp=sharing

May 3, 2013 – TES filed Complaint
May 14, 2013 – Court set Pre-Trial Conference for July 2, 2013 at 10:30am
June 3, 2013 – Casey filed Motion to Dismiss TES’ Complaint
July 2, 2013 – HEARING held – Court moved Hearing to Sept 17, 2013 at 2:00pm

Page 2 – “The parties have come to a consensual resolution of the Plaintiff’s claims [TES] against the Debtor [Casey Anthony], including the Plaintiff’s [TES] unsecured proof of claim number 5 filed in the Debtor’s [Casey Anthony] bankruptcy estate, and are in the process of finalizing and executing the settlement agreement. The extension requested herein will allow the parties to do so, and as such, good cause exists to grant such relief.”

Plaintiff [TES] requests the Court continue the Pretrial Conference for sixty (60) days in accordance with the Court’s availability, or to such other date as may be deemed appropriate by the Court.

“Undersigned counsel [Peter Russin for TES] has conferred with the Debtor’s counsel [David Schrader, Debra Ferwerda, and Charles Greene, for Casey Anthony] concerning the requested continuance, and the Debtor’s counsel informed undersigned counsel that the Debtor [Casey Anthony] agrees with the relief requested herein.”

Wow! This case has always been known for its Friday filings, but I never expected this. Thanks ThinkTank!

If a settlement of the lawsuit is reached between TES and FCA, I assume money will be exchanged. Since the lawsuit was registered as part of the BK FCA filed, will a portion of the settlement be given to the trustee for his pay and/or for distribution to other creditors as part of the BK judgment or will the lawsuit just be erased from the BK filing which would lessen the amount of the BK debt?

I wonder why this mysterious money didn't come up to pay her bills instead of wasting time filing for BK? Maybe it has just arrived. I hope her creditors, especially the IRS, are paying attention.

 

[?noanswer]

Wow! This case has always been known for its Friday filings, but I never expected this. Thanks ThinkTank!

If a settlement of the lawsuit is reached between TES and FCA, I assume money will be exchanged. Since the lawsuit was registered as part of the BK FCA filed, will a portion of the settlement be given to the trustee for his pay and/or for distribution to other creditors as part of the BK judgment or will the lawsuit just be erased from the BK filing which would lessen the amount of the BK debt?

I wonder why this mysterious money didn't come up to pay her bills instead of wasting time filing for BK? Maybe it has just arrived. I hope her creditors, especially the IRS, are paying attention.

BBM

If someone is "giving" her all this money ($25,000 + whatever it takes to settle with TES), would not there be a gift tax involved?

JMO

 

[watcher9]

BBM

If someone is "giving" her all this money ($25,000 + whatever it takes to settle with TES), would not there be a gift tax involved?

JMO

Oh, I imagine they have talked to their "ethics" lawyer to make sure they have crossed their t's before doing anything.

Since the lawsuit was against FCA, I would think payment to settle would have to "go through FCA" even if someone else paid it off and she didn't actually touch the money. Kind of like the way the sale of the pictures was handled getting the money to JB. The IRS was able to catch that deal, probably because it was documented by some sort of a 1099 type statement or tax filings from ABC.

I suspect this donor will not document this money other than to have some type of paperwork stating this money was a loan to FCA and she agreed to pay them back one day in the future. They can't say gift.

I hope every one of the creditors are on high alert.

 

[ExpectingUnicorns]

Makes you wonder if this will be setting a precedent and she is hoping for a settlement with ZG and Kronk as well. How could she think she could pay off one and not the others? Dang ~ How could this poor, bankrupt woman have access to so much money?

 

[A_News_Junkie]

:drumroll::drumroll::drumroll: http://www.🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬/950155/casey-anthony-must-testify-about-caylees-disappearance/ :drumroll::drumroll::drumroll:

:thewave::thewave:

 

[?noanswer]

:drumroll::drumroll::drumroll: http://www.🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬/950155/casey-anthony-must-testify-about-caylees-disappearance/ :drumroll::drumroll::drumroll:

:thewave::thewave:

I read this article earlier and the one statement that bothers me is:

"A judge must first decide if the case will be discharged or if it will got forward. Morgan said he believes it will because Anthony committed a calculated act against his client."

JMO

 

[ThinkTank]

I read this article earlier and the one statement that bothers me is:

"A judge must first decide if the case will be discharged or if it will got forward. Morgan said he believes it will because Anthony committed a calculated act against his client."

JMO

That is what concerns me also.
This bankruptcy judge appears to have sympathy for Casey Anthony, and he may rule in her favor at the Hearing next Tuesday, Sept 17th, and throw out both the Zenaida and Kronk cases.

 

[ExpectingUnicorns]

I read this article earlier and the one statement that bothers me is:

"A judge must first decide if the case will be discharged or if it will got forward. Morgan said he believes it will because Anthony committed a calculated act against his client."

JMO

I agree. I think this is a poorly written article that is short on facts and long on hopeful opinions. Besides, I can't understand why the author would have written on this subject rather than the alleged "settlement agreement" with TES which seems much more salient at the moment.

 

[Intermezzo]

I'm not expecting the deposition to actually happen. Wasn't there some sort of comment from one of her lawyers say that she would leave the state or country before she would testify to anything?

I wonder what moves she is going to make to avoid the deposition process. She will certainly try to buy more time, so I'm not holding my breath for October 9th.

BBM
IMO
And a move she and her posse of lawyers will make.
She and her team will drag it out as long as they can with whatever legal maneuvers they can file..

 

[Intermezzo]

Agreed Motion to Continue/Reschedule On Pretrial Conference
Filed by Peter D. Russin on behalf of Plaintiff Texas Equusearch Mounted Search and Recovery
(Entered: 09/13/2013)

https://docs.google.com/file/d/0BwEDmRAkTopSdzlyY21wZzdFRmc/edit?usp=sharing

May 3, 2013 – TES filed Complaint
May 14, 2013 – Court set Pre-Trial Conference for July 2, 2013 at 10:30am
June 3, 2013 – Casey filed Motion to Dismiss TES’ Complaint
July 2, 2013 – HEARING held – Court moved Hearing to Sept 17, 2013 at 2:00pm

Page 2 – “The parties have come to a consensual resolution of the Plaintiff’s claims [TES] against the Debtor [Casey Anthony], including the Plaintiff’s [TES] unsecured proof of claim number 5 filed in the Debtor’s [Casey Anthony] bankruptcy estate, and are in the process of finalizing and executing the settlement agreement. The extension requested herein will allow the parties to do so, and as such, good cause exists to grant such relief.”

Plaintiff [TES] requests the Court continue the Pretrial Conference for sixty (60) days in accordance with the Court’s availability, or to such other date as may be deemed appropriate by the Court.

“Undersigned counsel [Peter Russin for TES] has conferred with the Debtor’s counsel [David Schrader, Debra Ferwerda, and Charles Greene, for Casey Anthony] concerning the requested continuance, and the Debtor’s counsel informed undersigned counsel that the Debtor [Casey Anthony] agrees with the relief requested herein.”

A settlement for TES, REALLY?!?, that is great for TES...
I guess a settlement is safer for Casey and her posse of lawyers than fighting this civil suit with TES and going to court.
She and her posse of lawyers do not seem to want to settle and/or back down from the Zenaida lawsuit though.

Now if Casey were made to repay the IRS, the State of Florida and all gov't agencies that spent taxpayers money and wasted their time and resources because she made the conscious decision to lie, fabricate stories and point fingers at innocent persons, about what happened to her child.

 

[ThinkTank]

From the Lawyers thread - AZLawyer says

Bankruptcy is not a claim, but rather a proceeding made up (usually) of lots of claims, sometimes requiring lots of little separate trials. So the settlement of one claim (TES) normally would just mean that the number (if any) owed to TES out of the bankruptcy estate $ (if any) would be decided, so no separate trial would be necessary on that claim.The TES settlement would not have any effect on the deposition set in the ZFG case.

See above re: the settlement with TES. We haven't seen the settlement agreement yet, of course, so we don't know for sure that it involves money being paid. But assuming it does, I'm sure it will come from one of Casey's "supporters." Having "supporters" who are willing to pay your debts if you ask, but are not obligated to do so, doesn't change your status as bankrupt.IIRC the BK judge only denied the request to take Casey's depo in April because there was no adversary proceeding yet pending, and there had been no ruling yet on ZFG's request to proceed with the trial in state court instead of in BK court.ETA: The depo date was probably set by agreement. Lawyers tend to get a little lazy about filing depo notices if they've already exchanged emails/letters agreeing on the date.

 

[Intermezzo]

The document that TES filed yesterday does not say how much money FCA will pay in the settlement agreement. It only asks for (60) more days to finalize the paperwork on the settlement that they have already agreed to.

Whatever the settlement amount -- the question still remains -- where is she getting the money to settle with TES?

The $ 25,000 the bankruptcy Trustee is getting so she can keep the rights to her story, is a separate issue from TES' settlement.

Yes, money seems to be flowing to her pretty readily, willingly, easily it seems.
Money to live, money to by off a BK Trustee, money to settle 1 lawsuit where the plaintiff was seeking over $100,000 in damages...
She is getting the money from somewhere, and she's getting it pretty easily it seems.